Cargando…

Variation of Mechanical Characteristics of Polyurethane Foam: Effect of Test Method

Polyurethane foam (PUF), a representative insulation material, not only prevents heat conduction but can also support a load. Particular interest in rigid PUF proliferated over the past several years in fields where extreme environments are applied. A closed-cell structure which forms the interior o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, Ki-Beom, Kim, Hee-Tae, Her, Nam-Yong, Lee, Jae-Myung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6747564/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31443352
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12172672
_version_ 1783451927843962880
author Park, Ki-Beom
Kim, Hee-Tae
Her, Nam-Yong
Lee, Jae-Myung
author_facet Park, Ki-Beom
Kim, Hee-Tae
Her, Nam-Yong
Lee, Jae-Myung
author_sort Park, Ki-Beom
collection PubMed
description Polyurethane foam (PUF), a representative insulation material, not only prevents heat conduction but can also support a load. Particular interest in rigid PUF proliferated over the past several years in fields where extreme environments are applied. A closed-cell structure which forms the interior of rigid PUF serves to maximize the utilization of these polymeric foams. Rigid PUF is more sensitive to external conditions such as temperature or restraint than other structural materials such as steel. Depending on the market trends in which utilization of a cryogenic environment is expanding, the tendency of material behavior resulting from the binding effect also needs to be investigated. However, most conventional compression test method standards applicable to rigid PUF do not adequately reflect the restraints. Therefore, this study proposes a method for evaluating the mechanical performance of materials in a more reliable manner than that of conventional tests. Experimental observation and analysis validated this compression evaluation method in which constraints are considered. Consequently, the compressive strength of rigid PUF compared to the results of the conventional test showed a difference of up to 0.47 MPa (approximately 23%) at cryogenic temperatures. This result suggests that there are important factors to consider when assessing performance from a material perspective in an environment where rigid PUF insulation is utilized. It is believed that the test methods newly proposed in this study will provide an experimental framework that can be applied to the evaluation criteria of material properties and reflected in structural design.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6747564
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67475642019-09-27 Variation of Mechanical Characteristics of Polyurethane Foam: Effect of Test Method Park, Ki-Beom Kim, Hee-Tae Her, Nam-Yong Lee, Jae-Myung Materials (Basel) Article Polyurethane foam (PUF), a representative insulation material, not only prevents heat conduction but can also support a load. Particular interest in rigid PUF proliferated over the past several years in fields where extreme environments are applied. A closed-cell structure which forms the interior of rigid PUF serves to maximize the utilization of these polymeric foams. Rigid PUF is more sensitive to external conditions such as temperature or restraint than other structural materials such as steel. Depending on the market trends in which utilization of a cryogenic environment is expanding, the tendency of material behavior resulting from the binding effect also needs to be investigated. However, most conventional compression test method standards applicable to rigid PUF do not adequately reflect the restraints. Therefore, this study proposes a method for evaluating the mechanical performance of materials in a more reliable manner than that of conventional tests. Experimental observation and analysis validated this compression evaluation method in which constraints are considered. Consequently, the compressive strength of rigid PUF compared to the results of the conventional test showed a difference of up to 0.47 MPa (approximately 23%) at cryogenic temperatures. This result suggests that there are important factors to consider when assessing performance from a material perspective in an environment where rigid PUF insulation is utilized. It is believed that the test methods newly proposed in this study will provide an experimental framework that can be applied to the evaluation criteria of material properties and reflected in structural design. MDPI 2019-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6747564/ /pubmed/31443352 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12172672 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Park, Ki-Beom
Kim, Hee-Tae
Her, Nam-Yong
Lee, Jae-Myung
Variation of Mechanical Characteristics of Polyurethane Foam: Effect of Test Method
title Variation of Mechanical Characteristics of Polyurethane Foam: Effect of Test Method
title_full Variation of Mechanical Characteristics of Polyurethane Foam: Effect of Test Method
title_fullStr Variation of Mechanical Characteristics of Polyurethane Foam: Effect of Test Method
title_full_unstemmed Variation of Mechanical Characteristics of Polyurethane Foam: Effect of Test Method
title_short Variation of Mechanical Characteristics of Polyurethane Foam: Effect of Test Method
title_sort variation of mechanical characteristics of polyurethane foam: effect of test method
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6747564/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31443352
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12172672
work_keys_str_mv AT parkkibeom variationofmechanicalcharacteristicsofpolyurethanefoameffectoftestmethod
AT kimheetae variationofmechanicalcharacteristicsofpolyurethanefoameffectoftestmethod
AT hernamyong variationofmechanicalcharacteristicsofpolyurethanefoameffectoftestmethod
AT leejaemyung variationofmechanicalcharacteristicsofpolyurethanefoameffectoftestmethod