Cargando…

Methotrimeprazine versus haloperidol in palliative care patients with cancer-related nausea: a randomised, double-blind controlled trial

OBJECTIVES: Methotrimeprazine is commonly used for the management of nausea but never tested formally against other drugs used in this setting. The aim was to demonstrate superior antiemetic efficacy. DESIGN: Double-blind, randomised, controlled trial of methotrimeprazine versus haloperidol. SETTING...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hardy, Janet Rea, Skerman, Helen, Philip, Jennifer, Good, Phillip, Currow, David C, Mitchell, Geoffrey, Yates, Patsy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6747674/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31515428
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029942
_version_ 1783451952995106816
author Hardy, Janet Rea
Skerman, Helen
Philip, Jennifer
Good, Phillip
Currow, David C
Mitchell, Geoffrey
Yates, Patsy
author_facet Hardy, Janet Rea
Skerman, Helen
Philip, Jennifer
Good, Phillip
Currow, David C
Mitchell, Geoffrey
Yates, Patsy
author_sort Hardy, Janet Rea
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Methotrimeprazine is commonly used for the management of nausea but never tested formally against other drugs used in this setting. The aim was to demonstrate superior antiemetic efficacy. DESIGN: Double-blind, randomised, controlled trial of methotrimeprazine versus haloperidol. SETTING: 11 palliative care sites in Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were >18 years, had cancer, an average nausea score of ≥3/10 and able to tolerate oral medications. Ineligible patients had acute nausea related to treatment, nausea for which a specific antiemetic was indicated, were about to undergo a procedure or had received either of the study drugs or a change in glucocorticoid dose within the previous 48 hours. INTERVENTIONS: Based on previous studies, haloperidol was used as the control. Participants were randomised to encapsulated methotrimeprazine 6·25 mg or haloperidol 1·5 mg one time or two times per day and assessed every 24 hours for 72 hours. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A ≥two-point reduction in nausea score at 72 hours from baseline. Secondary outcome measures were as follows: complete response at 72 hours (end nausea score less than 3), response at 24 and 48 hours, vomiting episodes, use of rescue antiemetics, harms and global impression of change. RESULTS: Response to treatment at 72 hours was 75% (44/59) in the haloperidol (H) arm and 63% (36/57) in the methotrimeprazine (M) arm with no difference between groups (intention-to-treat analysis). Complete response rates were 56% (H) and 51% (M). In the per protocol analysis, there was no difference in response rates: (85% (44/52) (H) and 74% (36/49) (M). Complete per protocol response rates were 64% (H) and 59% (M). Toxicity worse than baseline was minimal with a trend towards greater sedation in the methotrimeprazine arm. CONCLUSION: This study did not demonstrate any difference in response rate between methotrimeprazine and haloperidol in the control of nausea. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN 12615000177550.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6747674
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67476742019-09-27 Methotrimeprazine versus haloperidol in palliative care patients with cancer-related nausea: a randomised, double-blind controlled trial Hardy, Janet Rea Skerman, Helen Philip, Jennifer Good, Phillip Currow, David C Mitchell, Geoffrey Yates, Patsy BMJ Open Palliative Care OBJECTIVES: Methotrimeprazine is commonly used for the management of nausea but never tested formally against other drugs used in this setting. The aim was to demonstrate superior antiemetic efficacy. DESIGN: Double-blind, randomised, controlled trial of methotrimeprazine versus haloperidol. SETTING: 11 palliative care sites in Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were >18 years, had cancer, an average nausea score of ≥3/10 and able to tolerate oral medications. Ineligible patients had acute nausea related to treatment, nausea for which a specific antiemetic was indicated, were about to undergo a procedure or had received either of the study drugs or a change in glucocorticoid dose within the previous 48 hours. INTERVENTIONS: Based on previous studies, haloperidol was used as the control. Participants were randomised to encapsulated methotrimeprazine 6·25 mg or haloperidol 1·5 mg one time or two times per day and assessed every 24 hours for 72 hours. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A ≥two-point reduction in nausea score at 72 hours from baseline. Secondary outcome measures were as follows: complete response at 72 hours (end nausea score less than 3), response at 24 and 48 hours, vomiting episodes, use of rescue antiemetics, harms and global impression of change. RESULTS: Response to treatment at 72 hours was 75% (44/59) in the haloperidol (H) arm and 63% (36/57) in the methotrimeprazine (M) arm with no difference between groups (intention-to-treat analysis). Complete response rates were 56% (H) and 51% (M). In the per protocol analysis, there was no difference in response rates: (85% (44/52) (H) and 74% (36/49) (M). Complete per protocol response rates were 64% (H) and 59% (M). Toxicity worse than baseline was minimal with a trend towards greater sedation in the methotrimeprazine arm. CONCLUSION: This study did not demonstrate any difference in response rate between methotrimeprazine and haloperidol in the control of nausea. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN 12615000177550. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6747674/ /pubmed/31515428 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029942 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Palliative Care
Hardy, Janet Rea
Skerman, Helen
Philip, Jennifer
Good, Phillip
Currow, David C
Mitchell, Geoffrey
Yates, Patsy
Methotrimeprazine versus haloperidol in palliative care patients with cancer-related nausea: a randomised, double-blind controlled trial
title Methotrimeprazine versus haloperidol in palliative care patients with cancer-related nausea: a randomised, double-blind controlled trial
title_full Methotrimeprazine versus haloperidol in palliative care patients with cancer-related nausea: a randomised, double-blind controlled trial
title_fullStr Methotrimeprazine versus haloperidol in palliative care patients with cancer-related nausea: a randomised, double-blind controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Methotrimeprazine versus haloperidol in palliative care patients with cancer-related nausea: a randomised, double-blind controlled trial
title_short Methotrimeprazine versus haloperidol in palliative care patients with cancer-related nausea: a randomised, double-blind controlled trial
title_sort methotrimeprazine versus haloperidol in palliative care patients with cancer-related nausea: a randomised, double-blind controlled trial
topic Palliative Care
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6747674/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31515428
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029942
work_keys_str_mv AT hardyjanetrea methotrimeprazineversushaloperidolinpalliativecarepatientswithcancerrelatednauseaarandomiseddoubleblindcontrolledtrial
AT skermanhelen methotrimeprazineversushaloperidolinpalliativecarepatientswithcancerrelatednauseaarandomiseddoubleblindcontrolledtrial
AT philipjennifer methotrimeprazineversushaloperidolinpalliativecarepatientswithcancerrelatednauseaarandomiseddoubleblindcontrolledtrial
AT goodphillip methotrimeprazineversushaloperidolinpalliativecarepatientswithcancerrelatednauseaarandomiseddoubleblindcontrolledtrial
AT currowdavidc methotrimeprazineversushaloperidolinpalliativecarepatientswithcancerrelatednauseaarandomiseddoubleblindcontrolledtrial
AT mitchellgeoffrey methotrimeprazineversushaloperidolinpalliativecarepatientswithcancerrelatednauseaarandomiseddoubleblindcontrolledtrial
AT yatespatsy methotrimeprazineversushaloperidolinpalliativecarepatientswithcancerrelatednauseaarandomiseddoubleblindcontrolledtrial