Cargando…

Biomechanical Study of a Novel, Expandable, Non-Metallic and Radiolucent CF/PEEK Vertebral Body Replacement (VBR)

Vertebral body replacement is well-established to stabilize vertebral injuries due to trauma or cancer. Spinal implants are mainly manufactured by metallic alloys; which leads to artifacts in radiological diagnostics; as well as in radiotherapy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the biomecha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Adler, Daniel, Akbar, Michael, Spicher, Anna, Goerke, Stephanie-Alice, Schmoelz, Werner
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6747954/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31454960
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12172732
_version_ 1783452009618210816
author Adler, Daniel
Akbar, Michael
Spicher, Anna
Goerke, Stephanie-Alice
Schmoelz, Werner
author_facet Adler, Daniel
Akbar, Michael
Spicher, Anna
Goerke, Stephanie-Alice
Schmoelz, Werner
author_sort Adler, Daniel
collection PubMed
description Vertebral body replacement is well-established to stabilize vertebral injuries due to trauma or cancer. Spinal implants are mainly manufactured by metallic alloys; which leads to artifacts in radiological diagnostics; as well as in radiotherapy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical data of a novel carbon fiber reinforced polyetheretherketone (CF/PEEK) vertebral body replacement (VBR). Six thoracolumbar specimens were tested in a six degrees of freedom spine tester. In all tested specimens CF/PEEK pedicle screws were used. Two different rods (CF/PEEK versus titanium) with/without cross connectors and two different VBRs (CF/PEEK prototype versus titanium) were tested. In lateral bending and flexion/extension; range of motion (ROM) was significantly reduced in all instrumented states. In axial rotation; the CF/PEEK combination (rods and VBR) resulted in the highest ROM; whereas titanium rods with titanium VBR resulted in the lowest ROM. Two cross connectors reduced ROM in axial rotation for all instrumentations independently of VBR or rod material. All instrumented states in all planes of motion showed a significantly reduced ROM. No significant differences were detected between the VBR materials in all planes of motion. Less rigid CF/PEEK rods in combination with the CF/PEEK VBR without cross connectors showed the smallest reduction in ROM. Independently of VBR and rod material; two cross connectors significantly reduced ROM in axial rotation. Compared to titanium rods; the use of CF/PEEK rods results in higher ROM. The stiffness of rod material has more influence on the ROM than the stiffness of VBR material.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6747954
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67479542019-09-27 Biomechanical Study of a Novel, Expandable, Non-Metallic and Radiolucent CF/PEEK Vertebral Body Replacement (VBR) Adler, Daniel Akbar, Michael Spicher, Anna Goerke, Stephanie-Alice Schmoelz, Werner Materials (Basel) Article Vertebral body replacement is well-established to stabilize vertebral injuries due to trauma or cancer. Spinal implants are mainly manufactured by metallic alloys; which leads to artifacts in radiological diagnostics; as well as in radiotherapy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical data of a novel carbon fiber reinforced polyetheretherketone (CF/PEEK) vertebral body replacement (VBR). Six thoracolumbar specimens were tested in a six degrees of freedom spine tester. In all tested specimens CF/PEEK pedicle screws were used. Two different rods (CF/PEEK versus titanium) with/without cross connectors and two different VBRs (CF/PEEK prototype versus titanium) were tested. In lateral bending and flexion/extension; range of motion (ROM) was significantly reduced in all instrumented states. In axial rotation; the CF/PEEK combination (rods and VBR) resulted in the highest ROM; whereas titanium rods with titanium VBR resulted in the lowest ROM. Two cross connectors reduced ROM in axial rotation for all instrumentations independently of VBR or rod material. All instrumented states in all planes of motion showed a significantly reduced ROM. No significant differences were detected between the VBR materials in all planes of motion. Less rigid CF/PEEK rods in combination with the CF/PEEK VBR without cross connectors showed the smallest reduction in ROM. Independently of VBR and rod material; two cross connectors significantly reduced ROM in axial rotation. Compared to titanium rods; the use of CF/PEEK rods results in higher ROM. The stiffness of rod material has more influence on the ROM than the stiffness of VBR material. MDPI 2019-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6747954/ /pubmed/31454960 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12172732 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Adler, Daniel
Akbar, Michael
Spicher, Anna
Goerke, Stephanie-Alice
Schmoelz, Werner
Biomechanical Study of a Novel, Expandable, Non-Metallic and Radiolucent CF/PEEK Vertebral Body Replacement (VBR)
title Biomechanical Study of a Novel, Expandable, Non-Metallic and Radiolucent CF/PEEK Vertebral Body Replacement (VBR)
title_full Biomechanical Study of a Novel, Expandable, Non-Metallic and Radiolucent CF/PEEK Vertebral Body Replacement (VBR)
title_fullStr Biomechanical Study of a Novel, Expandable, Non-Metallic and Radiolucent CF/PEEK Vertebral Body Replacement (VBR)
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical Study of a Novel, Expandable, Non-Metallic and Radiolucent CF/PEEK Vertebral Body Replacement (VBR)
title_short Biomechanical Study of a Novel, Expandable, Non-Metallic and Radiolucent CF/PEEK Vertebral Body Replacement (VBR)
title_sort biomechanical study of a novel, expandable, non-metallic and radiolucent cf/peek vertebral body replacement (vbr)
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6747954/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31454960
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12172732
work_keys_str_mv AT adlerdaniel biomechanicalstudyofanovelexpandablenonmetallicandradiolucentcfpeekvertebralbodyreplacementvbr
AT akbarmichael biomechanicalstudyofanovelexpandablenonmetallicandradiolucentcfpeekvertebralbodyreplacementvbr
AT spicheranna biomechanicalstudyofanovelexpandablenonmetallicandradiolucentcfpeekvertebralbodyreplacementvbr
AT goerkestephaniealice biomechanicalstudyofanovelexpandablenonmetallicandradiolucentcfpeekvertebralbodyreplacementvbr
AT schmoelzwerner biomechanicalstudyofanovelexpandablenonmetallicandradiolucentcfpeekvertebralbodyreplacementvbr