Cargando…

A comparison between ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and Air-Q Blocker in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) is an established device for airway management, while Air-Q Blocker (AQB) is a relatively new supraglottic device. The aim of this study is to compare AQB against PLMA in adults undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gupta, Roshni, Mahajan, Rajesh, Jatinder, Mukta, Gulati, Smriti, Mehta, Anjali, Nazir, Robina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6748002/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31543582
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/joacp.JOACP_397_17
_version_ 1783452020746747904
author Gupta, Roshni
Mahajan, Rajesh
Jatinder, Mukta
Gulati, Smriti
Mehta, Anjali
Nazir, Robina
author_facet Gupta, Roshni
Mahajan, Rajesh
Jatinder, Mukta
Gulati, Smriti
Mehta, Anjali
Nazir, Robina
author_sort Gupta, Roshni
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) is an established device for airway management, while Air-Q Blocker (AQB) is a relatively new supraglottic device. The aim of this study is to compare AQB against PLMA in adults undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eighty-eight adult patients scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia were randomly allocated into two groups. A drain tube (gastric tube for PLMA and blocker tube for AQB) was inserted through the drain channel of the respective device. PLMA was inserted in Group P (n = 44) and AQB was inserted in Group A (n = 44) to secure the airway. The primary endpoint was airway seal pressure. Secondarily, we sought to compare overall insertion success, ease of insertion, hemodynamic effects after initial placement, ease of drain tube placement, and perioperative oropharyngolaryngeal morbidity between the devices. RESULTS: Oropharyngeal seal pressures for AQB and PLMA were 31.5 ± 2.41 and 29.41 ± 2.14 cm H(2)O, respectively (P = 0.01). Insertion time was longer with AQB than PLMA, 25.59 ± 5.71 and 18.66 ± 3.15 seconds, respectively (P = 0.001). Ease and success rate of insertion was better with PLMA compared to AQB. Failure of device insertion was seen in 2 cases of Group A. Gastric distension was seen in 4 patients in Group A, requiring replacement with endotracheal tube in two patients. Ventilation was successful in all 44 patients with PLMA. Both the devices were comparable in providing a patent airway and adequate oxygenation during controlled ventilation. There was an increased trend of airway trauma and complications in the AQB group. CONCLUSION: Both PLMA and AQB show similar efficacy in maintaining ventilation and oxygenation, during laparoscopic surgery. However, proper positioning and functioning of the blocker tube of AQB is a limiting factor, and needs further evaluation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6748002
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67480022019-09-20 A comparison between ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and Air-Q Blocker in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy Gupta, Roshni Mahajan, Rajesh Jatinder, Mukta Gulati, Smriti Mehta, Anjali Nazir, Robina J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol Original Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) is an established device for airway management, while Air-Q Blocker (AQB) is a relatively new supraglottic device. The aim of this study is to compare AQB against PLMA in adults undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eighty-eight adult patients scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia were randomly allocated into two groups. A drain tube (gastric tube for PLMA and blocker tube for AQB) was inserted through the drain channel of the respective device. PLMA was inserted in Group P (n = 44) and AQB was inserted in Group A (n = 44) to secure the airway. The primary endpoint was airway seal pressure. Secondarily, we sought to compare overall insertion success, ease of insertion, hemodynamic effects after initial placement, ease of drain tube placement, and perioperative oropharyngolaryngeal morbidity between the devices. RESULTS: Oropharyngeal seal pressures for AQB and PLMA were 31.5 ± 2.41 and 29.41 ± 2.14 cm H(2)O, respectively (P = 0.01). Insertion time was longer with AQB than PLMA, 25.59 ± 5.71 and 18.66 ± 3.15 seconds, respectively (P = 0.001). Ease and success rate of insertion was better with PLMA compared to AQB. Failure of device insertion was seen in 2 cases of Group A. Gastric distension was seen in 4 patients in Group A, requiring replacement with endotracheal tube in two patients. Ventilation was successful in all 44 patients with PLMA. Both the devices were comparable in providing a patent airway and adequate oxygenation during controlled ventilation. There was an increased trend of airway trauma and complications in the AQB group. CONCLUSION: Both PLMA and AQB show similar efficacy in maintaining ventilation and oxygenation, during laparoscopic surgery. However, proper positioning and functioning of the blocker tube of AQB is a limiting factor, and needs further evaluation. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6748002/ /pubmed/31543582 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/joacp.JOACP_397_17 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Gupta, Roshni
Mahajan, Rajesh
Jatinder, Mukta
Gulati, Smriti
Mehta, Anjali
Nazir, Robina
A comparison between ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and Air-Q Blocker in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy
title A comparison between ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and Air-Q Blocker in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy
title_full A comparison between ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and Air-Q Blocker in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy
title_fullStr A comparison between ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and Air-Q Blocker in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy
title_full_unstemmed A comparison between ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and Air-Q Blocker in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy
title_short A comparison between ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and Air-Q Blocker in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy
title_sort comparison between proseal laryngeal mask airway and air-q blocker in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6748002/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31543582
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/joacp.JOACP_397_17
work_keys_str_mv AT guptaroshni acomparisonbetweenproseallaryngealmaskairwayandairqblockerinpatientsundergoingelectivelaparoscopiccholecystectomy
AT mahajanrajesh acomparisonbetweenproseallaryngealmaskairwayandairqblockerinpatientsundergoingelectivelaparoscopiccholecystectomy
AT jatindermukta acomparisonbetweenproseallaryngealmaskairwayandairqblockerinpatientsundergoingelectivelaparoscopiccholecystectomy
AT gulatismriti acomparisonbetweenproseallaryngealmaskairwayandairqblockerinpatientsundergoingelectivelaparoscopiccholecystectomy
AT mehtaanjali acomparisonbetweenproseallaryngealmaskairwayandairqblockerinpatientsundergoingelectivelaparoscopiccholecystectomy
AT nazirrobina acomparisonbetweenproseallaryngealmaskairwayandairqblockerinpatientsundergoingelectivelaparoscopiccholecystectomy
AT guptaroshni comparisonbetweenproseallaryngealmaskairwayandairqblockerinpatientsundergoingelectivelaparoscopiccholecystectomy
AT mahajanrajesh comparisonbetweenproseallaryngealmaskairwayandairqblockerinpatientsundergoingelectivelaparoscopiccholecystectomy
AT jatindermukta comparisonbetweenproseallaryngealmaskairwayandairqblockerinpatientsundergoingelectivelaparoscopiccholecystectomy
AT gulatismriti comparisonbetweenproseallaryngealmaskairwayandairqblockerinpatientsundergoingelectivelaparoscopiccholecystectomy
AT mehtaanjali comparisonbetweenproseallaryngealmaskairwayandairqblockerinpatientsundergoingelectivelaparoscopiccholecystectomy
AT nazirrobina comparisonbetweenproseallaryngealmaskairwayandairqblockerinpatientsundergoingelectivelaparoscopiccholecystectomy