Cargando…

Etiological analysis of parastomal hernia by computed tomography examination

INTRODUCTION: Parastomal hernia is a common complication after stoma formation. The definitive risk factors for parastomal hernia development remain unclear. AIM: This study evaluated the risk factors through computed tomography (CT) scan of patients with parastomal hernia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pu, Yu Wei, Yang, Xiao Dong, Gong, Wei, Xing, Chun Gen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6748055/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31534568
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2019.81409
_version_ 1783452029067198464
author Pu, Yu Wei
Yang, Xiao Dong
Gong, Wei
Xing, Chun Gen
author_facet Pu, Yu Wei
Yang, Xiao Dong
Gong, Wei
Xing, Chun Gen
author_sort Pu, Yu Wei
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Parastomal hernia is a common complication after stoma formation. The definitive risk factors for parastomal hernia development remain unclear. AIM: This study evaluated the risk factors through computed tomography (CT) scan of patients with parastomal hernia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All patients who underwent an operation at our institution from January 2008 to February 2014 were included. We recorded patient-related and operation-related variables, and CT scans were checked. All the variables were analyzed with SPSS 19 to identify the risk factors for parastomal hernia formation. RESULTS: Of the 128 patients who underwent colostomy, 49 (38.3%) developed a parastomal hernia during a median follow-up period of 20.1 months (range: 4–84 months). Hernia development was significantly associated with the thickness of subcutaneous fat in the abdominal wall, the location of the stoma, anteroposterior diameter and horizontal diameter of the body. The defect size of the abdominal wall is another risk factor. The larger the defect size of the abdominal wall, the larger is the parastomal stoma (3.79 ±1.51 vs. 2.13 ±0.74 cm horizontally and 4.90 ±2.25 vs. 2.94 ±0.73 cm vertically, p < 0.001). The hernia contents protrude into the hernial sac through the path of the inner side more than the outer side (77.6% vs. 12.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings in Chinese patients with parastomal hernia match those from Western countries: obesity, the location of the stoma, and the defect size of the abdominal wall are significant risk factors for parastomal hernia formation. The mesenteric region is a weak area, which is a site prone to parastomal hernia, and should be protected.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6748055
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67480552019-09-18 Etiological analysis of parastomal hernia by computed tomography examination Pu, Yu Wei Yang, Xiao Dong Gong, Wei Xing, Chun Gen Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne Original Paper INTRODUCTION: Parastomal hernia is a common complication after stoma formation. The definitive risk factors for parastomal hernia development remain unclear. AIM: This study evaluated the risk factors through computed tomography (CT) scan of patients with parastomal hernia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All patients who underwent an operation at our institution from January 2008 to February 2014 were included. We recorded patient-related and operation-related variables, and CT scans were checked. All the variables were analyzed with SPSS 19 to identify the risk factors for parastomal hernia formation. RESULTS: Of the 128 patients who underwent colostomy, 49 (38.3%) developed a parastomal hernia during a median follow-up period of 20.1 months (range: 4–84 months). Hernia development was significantly associated with the thickness of subcutaneous fat in the abdominal wall, the location of the stoma, anteroposterior diameter and horizontal diameter of the body. The defect size of the abdominal wall is another risk factor. The larger the defect size of the abdominal wall, the larger is the parastomal stoma (3.79 ±1.51 vs. 2.13 ±0.74 cm horizontally and 4.90 ±2.25 vs. 2.94 ±0.73 cm vertically, p < 0.001). The hernia contents protrude into the hernial sac through the path of the inner side more than the outer side (77.6% vs. 12.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings in Chinese patients with parastomal hernia match those from Western countries: obesity, the location of the stoma, and the defect size of the abdominal wall are significant risk factors for parastomal hernia formation. The mesenteric region is a weak area, which is a site prone to parastomal hernia, and should be protected. Termedia Publishing House 2019-01-21 2019-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6748055/ /pubmed/31534568 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2019.81409 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Fundacja Videochirurgii http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Pu, Yu Wei
Yang, Xiao Dong
Gong, Wei
Xing, Chun Gen
Etiological analysis of parastomal hernia by computed tomography examination
title Etiological analysis of parastomal hernia by computed tomography examination
title_full Etiological analysis of parastomal hernia by computed tomography examination
title_fullStr Etiological analysis of parastomal hernia by computed tomography examination
title_full_unstemmed Etiological analysis of parastomal hernia by computed tomography examination
title_short Etiological analysis of parastomal hernia by computed tomography examination
title_sort etiological analysis of parastomal hernia by computed tomography examination
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6748055/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31534568
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2019.81409
work_keys_str_mv AT puyuwei etiologicalanalysisofparastomalherniabycomputedtomographyexamination
AT yangxiaodong etiologicalanalysisofparastomalherniabycomputedtomographyexamination
AT gongwei etiologicalanalysisofparastomalherniabycomputedtomographyexamination
AT xingchungen etiologicalanalysisofparastomalherniabycomputedtomographyexamination