Cargando…
Impact of Global Health Electives on US Medical Residents: A Systematic Review
BACKGROUND: The prevalence of global health in graduate medical education in the United States (US) has soared over the past two decades. The majority of US internal medicine and pediatric residency programs now offer global health electives abroad. Despite the prevalence of global health electives...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Levy Library Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6748170/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30779519 http://dx.doi.org/10.29024/aogh.2379 |
_version_ | 1783452043511332864 |
---|---|
author | Lu, Paul M. Park, Elizabeth E. Rabin, Tracy L. Schwartz, Jeremy I. Shearer, Lee S. Siegler, Eugenia L. Peck, Robert N. |
author_facet | Lu, Paul M. Park, Elizabeth E. Rabin, Tracy L. Schwartz, Jeremy I. Shearer, Lee S. Siegler, Eugenia L. Peck, Robert N. |
author_sort | Lu, Paul M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The prevalence of global health in graduate medical education in the United States (US) has soared over the past two decades. The majority of US internal medicine and pediatric residency programs now offer global health electives abroad. Despite the prevalence of global health electives among US graduate medical programs today, challenges exist that may impact the experience for visiting trainees and/or host institutions. Previous reviews have predominately focused on experiences of undergraduate medical students and have primarily described positive outcomes. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to summarize the overall impact of global health electives on US internal medicine, medicine-pediatric, and pediatric residents, paying specific attention to any negative themes reported in the literature. METHODS: An Ovid MEDLINE and Ovid EMBASE literature search was conducted to identify studies that evaluated the effects of global health electives on US internal medicine, medicine-pediatric, and pediatric residents. FINDINGS: Ten studies were included. Four positive themes emerged: (1) improvement of medical knowledge, physical examination, and procedural skills, (2) improvement in resourcefulness and cost-effectiveness, (3) improvement in cultural and interpersonal competence, and (4) professional and career development. Two negative themes were identified: (1) health risks and (2) safety risks. CONCLUSIONS: Global health electives provide a number of perceived benefits for US medical trainees; however, we importantly highlight health and safety concerns described while abroad. Global health educators should recognize the host of unique challenges experienced during a global health elective and investigate how to best mitigate these concerns. Incorporation of mandatory pre-, intra-, and post-elective training programs and establishment of universally adopted global health best practice guidelines may serve to address some the challenges visiting trainees encounter while abroad. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6748170 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Levy Library Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67481702019-09-17 Impact of Global Health Electives on US Medical Residents: A Systematic Review Lu, Paul M. Park, Elizabeth E. Rabin, Tracy L. Schwartz, Jeremy I. Shearer, Lee S. Siegler, Eugenia L. Peck, Robert N. Ann Glob Health Original Research BACKGROUND: The prevalence of global health in graduate medical education in the United States (US) has soared over the past two decades. The majority of US internal medicine and pediatric residency programs now offer global health electives abroad. Despite the prevalence of global health electives among US graduate medical programs today, challenges exist that may impact the experience for visiting trainees and/or host institutions. Previous reviews have predominately focused on experiences of undergraduate medical students and have primarily described positive outcomes. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to summarize the overall impact of global health electives on US internal medicine, medicine-pediatric, and pediatric residents, paying specific attention to any negative themes reported in the literature. METHODS: An Ovid MEDLINE and Ovid EMBASE literature search was conducted to identify studies that evaluated the effects of global health electives on US internal medicine, medicine-pediatric, and pediatric residents. FINDINGS: Ten studies were included. Four positive themes emerged: (1) improvement of medical knowledge, physical examination, and procedural skills, (2) improvement in resourcefulness and cost-effectiveness, (3) improvement in cultural and interpersonal competence, and (4) professional and career development. Two negative themes were identified: (1) health risks and (2) safety risks. CONCLUSIONS: Global health electives provide a number of perceived benefits for US medical trainees; however, we importantly highlight health and safety concerns described while abroad. Global health educators should recognize the host of unique challenges experienced during a global health elective and investigate how to best mitigate these concerns. Incorporation of mandatory pre-, intra-, and post-elective training programs and establishment of universally adopted global health best practice guidelines may serve to address some the challenges visiting trainees encounter while abroad. Levy Library Press 2018-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6748170/ /pubmed/30779519 http://dx.doi.org/10.29024/aogh.2379 Text en Copyright: © 2018 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Lu, Paul M. Park, Elizabeth E. Rabin, Tracy L. Schwartz, Jeremy I. Shearer, Lee S. Siegler, Eugenia L. Peck, Robert N. Impact of Global Health Electives on US Medical Residents: A Systematic Review |
title | Impact of Global Health Electives on US Medical Residents: A Systematic Review |
title_full | Impact of Global Health Electives on US Medical Residents: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Impact of Global Health Electives on US Medical Residents: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of Global Health Electives on US Medical Residents: A Systematic Review |
title_short | Impact of Global Health Electives on US Medical Residents: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | impact of global health electives on us medical residents: a systematic review |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6748170/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30779519 http://dx.doi.org/10.29024/aogh.2379 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lupaulm impactofglobalhealthelectivesonusmedicalresidentsasystematicreview AT parkelizabethe impactofglobalhealthelectivesonusmedicalresidentsasystematicreview AT rabintracyl impactofglobalhealthelectivesonusmedicalresidentsasystematicreview AT schwartzjeremyi impactofglobalhealthelectivesonusmedicalresidentsasystematicreview AT shearerlees impactofglobalhealthelectivesonusmedicalresidentsasystematicreview AT sieglereugenial impactofglobalhealthelectivesonusmedicalresidentsasystematicreview AT peckrobertn impactofglobalhealthelectivesonusmedicalresidentsasystematicreview |