Cargando…

#CDCGrandRounds and #VitalSigns: A Twitter Analysis

BACKGROUND: The CDC hosts monthly panel presentations titled ‘Public Health Grand Rounds’ and publishes monthly reports known as Vital Signs. Hashtags #CDCGrandRounds and #VitalSigns were used to promote them on Twitter. OBJECTIVES: This study quantified the effect of hashtag count, mention count, a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jackson, Ashley M., Mullican, Lindsay A., Yin, Jingjing, Ho Tse, Zion Tsz, Liang, Hai, Fu, King-Wa, Ahweyevu, Jennifer O., Jenkins, Jimmy J., Saroha, Nitin, Fung, Isaac Chun-Hai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Levy Library Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6748269/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30779521
http://dx.doi.org/10.29024/aogh.2381
_version_ 1783452066011676672
author Jackson, Ashley M.
Mullican, Lindsay A.
Yin, Jingjing
Ho Tse, Zion Tsz
Liang, Hai
Fu, King-Wa
Ahweyevu, Jennifer O.
Jenkins, Jimmy J.
Saroha, Nitin
Fung, Isaac Chun-Hai
author_facet Jackson, Ashley M.
Mullican, Lindsay A.
Yin, Jingjing
Ho Tse, Zion Tsz
Liang, Hai
Fu, King-Wa
Ahweyevu, Jennifer O.
Jenkins, Jimmy J.
Saroha, Nitin
Fung, Isaac Chun-Hai
author_sort Jackson, Ashley M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The CDC hosts monthly panel presentations titled ‘Public Health Grand Rounds’ and publishes monthly reports known as Vital Signs. Hashtags #CDCGrandRounds and #VitalSigns were used to promote them on Twitter. OBJECTIVES: This study quantified the effect of hashtag count, mention count, and URL count and attaching visual cues to #CDCGrandRounds or #VitalSigns tweets on their retweet frequency. METHODS: Through Twitter Search Application Programming Interface, original tweets containing the hashtag #CDCGrandRounds (n = 6,966; April 21, 2011–October 25, 2016) and the hashtag #VitalSigns (n = 15,015; March 19, 2013–October 31, 2016) were retrieved respectively. Negative binomial regression models were applied to each corpus to estimate the associations between retweet frequency and three predictors (hashtag count, mention count, and URL link count). Each corpus was sub-set into cycles (#CDCGrandRounds: n = 58, #VitalSigns: n = 42). We manually coded the 30 tweets with the highest number of retweets for each cycle, whether it contained visual cues (images or videos). Univariable negative binomial regression models were applied to compute the prevalence ratio (PR) of retweet frequency for each cycle, between tweets with and without visual cues. FINDINGS: URL links increased retweet frequency in both corpora; effects of hashtag count and mention count differed between the two corpora. Of the 58 #CDCGrandRounds cycles, 29 were found to have statistically significantly different retweet frequencies between tweets with and without visual cues. Of these 29 cycles, one had a PR estimate < 1; twenty-four, PR > 1 but < 3; and four, PR > 3. Of the 42 #VitalSigns cycles, 19 were statistically significant. Of these 19 cycles, six were PR > 1 and < 3; and thirteen, PR > 3. CONCLUSIONS: The increase of retweet frequency through attaching visual cues varied across cycles for original tweets with #CDCGrandRounds and #VitalSigns. Future research is needed to determine the optimal choice of visual cues to maximize the influence of public health tweets.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6748269
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Levy Library Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67482692019-09-17 #CDCGrandRounds and #VitalSigns: A Twitter Analysis Jackson, Ashley M. Mullican, Lindsay A. Yin, Jingjing Ho Tse, Zion Tsz Liang, Hai Fu, King-Wa Ahweyevu, Jennifer O. Jenkins, Jimmy J. Saroha, Nitin Fung, Isaac Chun-Hai Ann Glob Health Original Research BACKGROUND: The CDC hosts monthly panel presentations titled ‘Public Health Grand Rounds’ and publishes monthly reports known as Vital Signs. Hashtags #CDCGrandRounds and #VitalSigns were used to promote them on Twitter. OBJECTIVES: This study quantified the effect of hashtag count, mention count, and URL count and attaching visual cues to #CDCGrandRounds or #VitalSigns tweets on their retweet frequency. METHODS: Through Twitter Search Application Programming Interface, original tweets containing the hashtag #CDCGrandRounds (n = 6,966; April 21, 2011–October 25, 2016) and the hashtag #VitalSigns (n = 15,015; March 19, 2013–October 31, 2016) were retrieved respectively. Negative binomial regression models were applied to each corpus to estimate the associations between retweet frequency and three predictors (hashtag count, mention count, and URL link count). Each corpus was sub-set into cycles (#CDCGrandRounds: n = 58, #VitalSigns: n = 42). We manually coded the 30 tweets with the highest number of retweets for each cycle, whether it contained visual cues (images or videos). Univariable negative binomial regression models were applied to compute the prevalence ratio (PR) of retweet frequency for each cycle, between tweets with and without visual cues. FINDINGS: URL links increased retweet frequency in both corpora; effects of hashtag count and mention count differed between the two corpora. Of the 58 #CDCGrandRounds cycles, 29 were found to have statistically significantly different retweet frequencies between tweets with and without visual cues. Of these 29 cycles, one had a PR estimate < 1; twenty-four, PR > 1 but < 3; and four, PR > 3. Of the 42 #VitalSigns cycles, 19 were statistically significant. Of these 19 cycles, six were PR > 1 and < 3; and thirteen, PR > 3. CONCLUSIONS: The increase of retweet frequency through attaching visual cues varied across cycles for original tweets with #CDCGrandRounds and #VitalSigns. Future research is needed to determine the optimal choice of visual cues to maximize the influence of public health tweets. Levy Library Press 2018-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6748269/ /pubmed/30779521 http://dx.doi.org/10.29024/aogh.2381 Text en Copyright: © 2018 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research
Jackson, Ashley M.
Mullican, Lindsay A.
Yin, Jingjing
Ho Tse, Zion Tsz
Liang, Hai
Fu, King-Wa
Ahweyevu, Jennifer O.
Jenkins, Jimmy J.
Saroha, Nitin
Fung, Isaac Chun-Hai
#CDCGrandRounds and #VitalSigns: A Twitter Analysis
title #CDCGrandRounds and #VitalSigns: A Twitter Analysis
title_full #CDCGrandRounds and #VitalSigns: A Twitter Analysis
title_fullStr #CDCGrandRounds and #VitalSigns: A Twitter Analysis
title_full_unstemmed #CDCGrandRounds and #VitalSigns: A Twitter Analysis
title_short #CDCGrandRounds and #VitalSigns: A Twitter Analysis
title_sort #cdcgrandrounds and #vitalsigns: a twitter analysis
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6748269/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30779521
http://dx.doi.org/10.29024/aogh.2381
work_keys_str_mv AT jacksonashleym cdcgrandroundsandvitalsignsatwitteranalysis
AT mullicanlindsaya cdcgrandroundsandvitalsignsatwitteranalysis
AT yinjingjing cdcgrandroundsandvitalsignsatwitteranalysis
AT hotseziontsz cdcgrandroundsandvitalsignsatwitteranalysis
AT lianghai cdcgrandroundsandvitalsignsatwitteranalysis
AT fukingwa cdcgrandroundsandvitalsignsatwitteranalysis
AT ahweyevujennifero cdcgrandroundsandvitalsignsatwitteranalysis
AT jenkinsjimmyj cdcgrandroundsandvitalsignsatwitteranalysis
AT sarohanitin cdcgrandroundsandvitalsignsatwitteranalysis
AT fungisaacchunhai cdcgrandroundsandvitalsignsatwitteranalysis