Cargando…

HIV Viral Dynamics of Lopinavir/Ritonavir Monotherapy as Second-Line Treatment: A Prospective, Single-Arm Trial

BACKGROUND: Characterizing viral response to lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) monotherapy as second-line treatment may guide recommendations for resource-limited settings (RLS). METHODS: We conducted a 48-week prospective, single-arm study of LPV/r monotherapy in patients failing first-line therapy in Ni...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Claassen, Cassidy W., Keckich, David, Nwizu, Chidi, Abimiku, Alash’le, Salami, Donald, Obiefune, Michael, Gilliam, Bruce L., Amoroso, Anthony
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6748552/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30798695
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325958218823209
_version_ 1783452114256658432
author Claassen, Cassidy W.
Keckich, David
Nwizu, Chidi
Abimiku, Alash’le
Salami, Donald
Obiefune, Michael
Gilliam, Bruce L.
Amoroso, Anthony
author_facet Claassen, Cassidy W.
Keckich, David
Nwizu, Chidi
Abimiku, Alash’le
Salami, Donald
Obiefune, Michael
Gilliam, Bruce L.
Amoroso, Anthony
author_sort Claassen, Cassidy W.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Characterizing viral response to lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) monotherapy as second-line treatment may guide recommendations for resource-limited settings (RLS). METHODS: We conducted a 48-week prospective, single-arm study of LPV/r monotherapy in patients failing first-line therapy in Nigeria. The primary outcome was sustained HIV-1 viral load (VL) <400 copies/mL at 48 weeks. RESULTS: Of 30 enrolled patients, 28 (93%) achieved viral suppression on LPV/r, while 29 (96%) experienced low-level viremia. At 48 weeks, 9 (30%) met the primary outcome of sustained viral suppression; 14 (47%) patients were suppressed on LPV/r in a snapshot analysis. Detectable VLs at 12 and 24 weeks were strongly associated with treatment failure at 48 weeks. New resistance mutations were not detected. The trial was stopped early due to treatment failure. CONCLUSION: In this study, the rate of virologic failure among patients on a second-line lopinavir monotherapy regimen was relatively high and predicted by early detectable viremia. However, no LPV/r-associated resistance mutations were detected despite fluctuating low-level viremia, demonstrating the high genetic barrier to resistance of the protease inhibitor class which could be useful in RLS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6748552
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67485522019-11-04 HIV Viral Dynamics of Lopinavir/Ritonavir Monotherapy as Second-Line Treatment: A Prospective, Single-Arm Trial Claassen, Cassidy W. Keckich, David Nwizu, Chidi Abimiku, Alash’le Salami, Donald Obiefune, Michael Gilliam, Bruce L. Amoroso, Anthony J Int Assoc Provid AIDS Care Original Article BACKGROUND: Characterizing viral response to lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) monotherapy as second-line treatment may guide recommendations for resource-limited settings (RLS). METHODS: We conducted a 48-week prospective, single-arm study of LPV/r monotherapy in patients failing first-line therapy in Nigeria. The primary outcome was sustained HIV-1 viral load (VL) <400 copies/mL at 48 weeks. RESULTS: Of 30 enrolled patients, 28 (93%) achieved viral suppression on LPV/r, while 29 (96%) experienced low-level viremia. At 48 weeks, 9 (30%) met the primary outcome of sustained viral suppression; 14 (47%) patients were suppressed on LPV/r in a snapshot analysis. Detectable VLs at 12 and 24 weeks were strongly associated with treatment failure at 48 weeks. New resistance mutations were not detected. The trial was stopped early due to treatment failure. CONCLUSION: In this study, the rate of virologic failure among patients on a second-line lopinavir monotherapy regimen was relatively high and predicted by early detectable viremia. However, no LPV/r-associated resistance mutations were detected despite fluctuating low-level viremia, demonstrating the high genetic barrier to resistance of the protease inhibitor class which could be useful in RLS. SAGE Publications 2019-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6748552/ /pubmed/30798695 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325958218823209 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Article
Claassen, Cassidy W.
Keckich, David
Nwizu, Chidi
Abimiku, Alash’le
Salami, Donald
Obiefune, Michael
Gilliam, Bruce L.
Amoroso, Anthony
HIV Viral Dynamics of Lopinavir/Ritonavir Monotherapy as Second-Line Treatment: A Prospective, Single-Arm Trial
title HIV Viral Dynamics of Lopinavir/Ritonavir Monotherapy as Second-Line Treatment: A Prospective, Single-Arm Trial
title_full HIV Viral Dynamics of Lopinavir/Ritonavir Monotherapy as Second-Line Treatment: A Prospective, Single-Arm Trial
title_fullStr HIV Viral Dynamics of Lopinavir/Ritonavir Monotherapy as Second-Line Treatment: A Prospective, Single-Arm Trial
title_full_unstemmed HIV Viral Dynamics of Lopinavir/Ritonavir Monotherapy as Second-Line Treatment: A Prospective, Single-Arm Trial
title_short HIV Viral Dynamics of Lopinavir/Ritonavir Monotherapy as Second-Line Treatment: A Prospective, Single-Arm Trial
title_sort hiv viral dynamics of lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy as second-line treatment: a prospective, single-arm trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6748552/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30798695
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325958218823209
work_keys_str_mv AT claassencassidyw hivviraldynamicsoflopinavirritonavirmonotherapyassecondlinetreatmentaprospectivesinglearmtrial
AT keckichdavid hivviraldynamicsoflopinavirritonavirmonotherapyassecondlinetreatmentaprospectivesinglearmtrial
AT nwizuchidi hivviraldynamicsoflopinavirritonavirmonotherapyassecondlinetreatmentaprospectivesinglearmtrial
AT abimikualashle hivviraldynamicsoflopinavirritonavirmonotherapyassecondlinetreatmentaprospectivesinglearmtrial
AT salamidonald hivviraldynamicsoflopinavirritonavirmonotherapyassecondlinetreatmentaprospectivesinglearmtrial
AT obiefunemichael hivviraldynamicsoflopinavirritonavirmonotherapyassecondlinetreatmentaprospectivesinglearmtrial
AT gilliambrucel hivviraldynamicsoflopinavirritonavirmonotherapyassecondlinetreatmentaprospectivesinglearmtrial
AT amorosoanthony hivviraldynamicsoflopinavirritonavirmonotherapyassecondlinetreatmentaprospectivesinglearmtrial