Cargando…
Management Strategies for POSEIDON Groups 3 and 4
In the POSEIDON classification, patients belonging to groups 3 and 4 share the same common feature of a poor ovarian reserve which independently of age renders them at high risk of a poor reproductive outcome. Overall, POSEIDON groups 1–4 constitute approximately 47% of patients attending assisted r...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6749147/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31572298 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2019.00614 |
_version_ | 1783452213803220992 |
---|---|
author | Haahr, Thor Dosouto, Carlos Alviggi, Carlo Esteves, Sandro C. Humaidan, Peter |
author_facet | Haahr, Thor Dosouto, Carlos Alviggi, Carlo Esteves, Sandro C. Humaidan, Peter |
author_sort | Haahr, Thor |
collection | PubMed |
description | In the POSEIDON classification, patients belonging to groups 3 and 4 share the same common feature of a poor ovarian reserve which independently of age renders them at high risk of a poor reproductive outcome. Overall, POSEIDON groups 1–4 constitute approximately 47% of patients attending assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment. With the increasing delay in childbearing, POSEIDON group 4 seems to increase in numbers now in some centers constituting more than 50% of the total POSEIDON population, whereas group 3 patients constitute approximately 10%. Both POSEIDON groups 3 and 4 patients require special attention as regards pre-treatment strategy, ovarian stimulation, adjuvant treatment, and ovulation trigger strategy in order to optimize the probability of having at least one euploid blastocyst for transfer. Although more evidence is needed, recent advances seem to have increased the reproductive outcomes in the poor prognosis patient. The key to success is individualization in all steps of ART treatment. Herein, we review the recent evidence for the management of POSEIDON groups 3 and 4. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6749147 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67491472019-09-30 Management Strategies for POSEIDON Groups 3 and 4 Haahr, Thor Dosouto, Carlos Alviggi, Carlo Esteves, Sandro C. Humaidan, Peter Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Endocrinology In the POSEIDON classification, patients belonging to groups 3 and 4 share the same common feature of a poor ovarian reserve which independently of age renders them at high risk of a poor reproductive outcome. Overall, POSEIDON groups 1–4 constitute approximately 47% of patients attending assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment. With the increasing delay in childbearing, POSEIDON group 4 seems to increase in numbers now in some centers constituting more than 50% of the total POSEIDON population, whereas group 3 patients constitute approximately 10%. Both POSEIDON groups 3 and 4 patients require special attention as regards pre-treatment strategy, ovarian stimulation, adjuvant treatment, and ovulation trigger strategy in order to optimize the probability of having at least one euploid blastocyst for transfer. Although more evidence is needed, recent advances seem to have increased the reproductive outcomes in the poor prognosis patient. The key to success is individualization in all steps of ART treatment. Herein, we review the recent evidence for the management of POSEIDON groups 3 and 4. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6749147/ /pubmed/31572298 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2019.00614 Text en Copyright © 2019 Haahr, Dosouto, Alviggi, Esteves and Humaidan. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Endocrinology Haahr, Thor Dosouto, Carlos Alviggi, Carlo Esteves, Sandro C. Humaidan, Peter Management Strategies for POSEIDON Groups 3 and 4 |
title | Management Strategies for POSEIDON Groups 3 and 4 |
title_full | Management Strategies for POSEIDON Groups 3 and 4 |
title_fullStr | Management Strategies for POSEIDON Groups 3 and 4 |
title_full_unstemmed | Management Strategies for POSEIDON Groups 3 and 4 |
title_short | Management Strategies for POSEIDON Groups 3 and 4 |
title_sort | management strategies for poseidon groups 3 and 4 |
topic | Endocrinology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6749147/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31572298 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2019.00614 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT haahrthor managementstrategiesforposeidongroups3and4 AT dosoutocarlos managementstrategiesforposeidongroups3and4 AT alviggicarlo managementstrategiesforposeidongroups3and4 AT estevessandroc managementstrategiesforposeidongroups3and4 AT humaidanpeter managementstrategiesforposeidongroups3and4 |