Cargando…

Sensitivity of Vegetation Indices for Estimating Vegetative N Status in Winter Wheat

Precise sensor-based non-destructive estimation of crop nitrogen (N) status is essential for low-cost, objective optimization of N fertilization, as well as for early estimation of yield potential and N use efficiency. Several studies assessed the performance of spectral vegetation indices (SVI) for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Prey, Lukas, Schmidhalter, Urs
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6749256/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31461857
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19173712
_version_ 1783452235501404160
author Prey, Lukas
Schmidhalter, Urs
author_facet Prey, Lukas
Schmidhalter, Urs
author_sort Prey, Lukas
collection PubMed
description Precise sensor-based non-destructive estimation of crop nitrogen (N) status is essential for low-cost, objective optimization of N fertilization, as well as for early estimation of yield potential and N use efficiency. Several studies assessed the performance of spectral vegetation indices (SVI) for winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), often either for conditions of low N status or across a wide range of the target traits N uptake (Nup), N concentration (NC), dry matter biomass (DM), and N nutrition index (NNI). This study aimed at a critical assessment of the estimation ability depending on the level of the target traits. It included seven years’ data with nine measurement dates from early stem elongation until flowering in eight N regimes (0–420 kg N ha(−1)) for selected SVIs. Tested across years, a pronounced date-specific clustering was found particularly for DM and NC. While for DM, only the R900_970 gave moderate but saturated relationships (R(2) = 0.47, p < 0.001) and no index was useful for NC across dates, NNI and Nup could be better estimated (REIP: R(2) = 0.59, p < 0.001 for both traits). Tested within growth stages across N levels, the order of the estimation of the traits was mostly Nup ≈ NNI > NC ≈ DM. Depending on the number (n = 1–3) and characteristic of cultivars included, the relationships improved when testing within instead of across cultivars, with the relatively lowest cultivar effect on the estimation of DM and the strongest on NC. For assessing the trait estimation under conditions of high–excessive N fertilization, the range of the target traits was divided into two intervals with NNI values < 0.8 (interval 1: low N status) and with NNI values > 0.8 (interval 2: high N status). Although better estimations were found in interval 1, useful relationships were also obtained in interval 2 from the best indices (DM: R780_740: average R(2) = 0.35, RMSE = 567 kg ha(−1); NC: REIP: average R(2) = 0.40, RMSE = 0.25%; NNI: REIP: average R(2) = 0.46, RMSE = 0.10; Nup: REIP: average R(2) = 0.48, RMSE = 21 kg N ha(−1)). While in interval 1, all indices performed rather similarly, the three red edge-based indices were clearly better suited for the three N-related traits. The results are promising for applying SVIs also under conditions of high N status, aiming at detecting and avoiding excessive N use. While in canopies of lower N status, the use of simple NIR/VIS indices may be sufficient without losing much precision, the red edge information appears crucial for conditions of higher N status. These findings can be transferred to the configuration and use of simpler multispectral sensors under conditions of contrasting N status in precision farming.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6749256
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67492562019-09-27 Sensitivity of Vegetation Indices for Estimating Vegetative N Status in Winter Wheat Prey, Lukas Schmidhalter, Urs Sensors (Basel) Article Precise sensor-based non-destructive estimation of crop nitrogen (N) status is essential for low-cost, objective optimization of N fertilization, as well as for early estimation of yield potential and N use efficiency. Several studies assessed the performance of spectral vegetation indices (SVI) for winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), often either for conditions of low N status or across a wide range of the target traits N uptake (Nup), N concentration (NC), dry matter biomass (DM), and N nutrition index (NNI). This study aimed at a critical assessment of the estimation ability depending on the level of the target traits. It included seven years’ data with nine measurement dates from early stem elongation until flowering in eight N regimes (0–420 kg N ha(−1)) for selected SVIs. Tested across years, a pronounced date-specific clustering was found particularly for DM and NC. While for DM, only the R900_970 gave moderate but saturated relationships (R(2) = 0.47, p < 0.001) and no index was useful for NC across dates, NNI and Nup could be better estimated (REIP: R(2) = 0.59, p < 0.001 for both traits). Tested within growth stages across N levels, the order of the estimation of the traits was mostly Nup ≈ NNI > NC ≈ DM. Depending on the number (n = 1–3) and characteristic of cultivars included, the relationships improved when testing within instead of across cultivars, with the relatively lowest cultivar effect on the estimation of DM and the strongest on NC. For assessing the trait estimation under conditions of high–excessive N fertilization, the range of the target traits was divided into two intervals with NNI values < 0.8 (interval 1: low N status) and with NNI values > 0.8 (interval 2: high N status). Although better estimations were found in interval 1, useful relationships were also obtained in interval 2 from the best indices (DM: R780_740: average R(2) = 0.35, RMSE = 567 kg ha(−1); NC: REIP: average R(2) = 0.40, RMSE = 0.25%; NNI: REIP: average R(2) = 0.46, RMSE = 0.10; Nup: REIP: average R(2) = 0.48, RMSE = 21 kg N ha(−1)). While in interval 1, all indices performed rather similarly, the three red edge-based indices were clearly better suited for the three N-related traits. The results are promising for applying SVIs also under conditions of high N status, aiming at detecting and avoiding excessive N use. While in canopies of lower N status, the use of simple NIR/VIS indices may be sufficient without losing much precision, the red edge information appears crucial for conditions of higher N status. These findings can be transferred to the configuration and use of simpler multispectral sensors under conditions of contrasting N status in precision farming. MDPI 2019-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6749256/ /pubmed/31461857 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19173712 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Prey, Lukas
Schmidhalter, Urs
Sensitivity of Vegetation Indices for Estimating Vegetative N Status in Winter Wheat
title Sensitivity of Vegetation Indices for Estimating Vegetative N Status in Winter Wheat
title_full Sensitivity of Vegetation Indices for Estimating Vegetative N Status in Winter Wheat
title_fullStr Sensitivity of Vegetation Indices for Estimating Vegetative N Status in Winter Wheat
title_full_unstemmed Sensitivity of Vegetation Indices for Estimating Vegetative N Status in Winter Wheat
title_short Sensitivity of Vegetation Indices for Estimating Vegetative N Status in Winter Wheat
title_sort sensitivity of vegetation indices for estimating vegetative n status in winter wheat
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6749256/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31461857
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19173712
work_keys_str_mv AT preylukas sensitivityofvegetationindicesforestimatingvegetativenstatusinwinterwheat
AT schmidhalterurs sensitivityofvegetationindicesforestimatingvegetativenstatusinwinterwheat