Cargando…
Investigating 2-D and 3-D Proximal Remote Sensing Techniques for Vineyard Yield Estimation
Vineyard yield estimation provides the winegrower with insightful information regarding the expected yield, facilitating managerial decisions to achieve maximum quantity and quality and assisting the winery with logistics. The use of proximal remote sensing technology and techniques for yield estima...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6749446/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31443479 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19173652 |
_version_ | 1783452280757944320 |
---|---|
author | Hacking, Chris Poona, Nitesh Manzan, Nicola Poblete-Echeverría, Carlos |
author_facet | Hacking, Chris Poona, Nitesh Manzan, Nicola Poblete-Echeverría, Carlos |
author_sort | Hacking, Chris |
collection | PubMed |
description | Vineyard yield estimation provides the winegrower with insightful information regarding the expected yield, facilitating managerial decisions to achieve maximum quantity and quality and assisting the winery with logistics. The use of proximal remote sensing technology and techniques for yield estimation has produced limited success within viticulture. In this study, 2-D RGB and 3-D RGB-D (Kinect sensor) imagery were investigated for yield estimation in a vertical shoot positioned (VSP) vineyard. Three experiments were implemented, including two measurement levels and two canopy treatments. The RGB imagery (bunch- and plant-level) underwent image segmentation before the fruit area was estimated using a calibrated pixel area. RGB-D imagery captured at bunch-level (mesh) and plant-level (point cloud) was reconstructed for fruit volume estimation. The RGB and RGB-D measurements utilised cross-validation to determine fruit mass, which was subsequently used for yield estimation. Experiment one’s (laboratory conditions) bunch-level results achieved a high yield estimation agreement with RGB-D imagery (r(2) = 0.950), which outperformed RGB imagery (r(2) = 0.889). Both RGB and RGB-D performed similarly in experiment two (bunch-level), while RGB outperformed RGB-D in experiment three (plant-level). The RGB-D sensor (Kinect) is suited to ideal laboratory conditions, while the robust RGB methodology is suitable for both laboratory and in-situ yield estimation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6749446 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67494462019-09-27 Investigating 2-D and 3-D Proximal Remote Sensing Techniques for Vineyard Yield Estimation Hacking, Chris Poona, Nitesh Manzan, Nicola Poblete-Echeverría, Carlos Sensors (Basel) Article Vineyard yield estimation provides the winegrower with insightful information regarding the expected yield, facilitating managerial decisions to achieve maximum quantity and quality and assisting the winery with logistics. The use of proximal remote sensing technology and techniques for yield estimation has produced limited success within viticulture. In this study, 2-D RGB and 3-D RGB-D (Kinect sensor) imagery were investigated for yield estimation in a vertical shoot positioned (VSP) vineyard. Three experiments were implemented, including two measurement levels and two canopy treatments. The RGB imagery (bunch- and plant-level) underwent image segmentation before the fruit area was estimated using a calibrated pixel area. RGB-D imagery captured at bunch-level (mesh) and plant-level (point cloud) was reconstructed for fruit volume estimation. The RGB and RGB-D measurements utilised cross-validation to determine fruit mass, which was subsequently used for yield estimation. Experiment one’s (laboratory conditions) bunch-level results achieved a high yield estimation agreement with RGB-D imagery (r(2) = 0.950), which outperformed RGB imagery (r(2) = 0.889). Both RGB and RGB-D performed similarly in experiment two (bunch-level), while RGB outperformed RGB-D in experiment three (plant-level). The RGB-D sensor (Kinect) is suited to ideal laboratory conditions, while the robust RGB methodology is suitable for both laboratory and in-situ yield estimation. MDPI 2019-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6749446/ /pubmed/31443479 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19173652 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Hacking, Chris Poona, Nitesh Manzan, Nicola Poblete-Echeverría, Carlos Investigating 2-D and 3-D Proximal Remote Sensing Techniques for Vineyard Yield Estimation |
title | Investigating 2-D and 3-D Proximal Remote Sensing Techniques for Vineyard Yield Estimation |
title_full | Investigating 2-D and 3-D Proximal Remote Sensing Techniques for Vineyard Yield Estimation |
title_fullStr | Investigating 2-D and 3-D Proximal Remote Sensing Techniques for Vineyard Yield Estimation |
title_full_unstemmed | Investigating 2-D and 3-D Proximal Remote Sensing Techniques for Vineyard Yield Estimation |
title_short | Investigating 2-D and 3-D Proximal Remote Sensing Techniques for Vineyard Yield Estimation |
title_sort | investigating 2-d and 3-d proximal remote sensing techniques for vineyard yield estimation |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6749446/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31443479 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19173652 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hackingchris investigating2dand3dproximalremotesensingtechniquesforvineyardyieldestimation AT poonanitesh investigating2dand3dproximalremotesensingtechniquesforvineyardyieldestimation AT manzannicola investigating2dand3dproximalremotesensingtechniquesforvineyardyieldestimation AT pobleteecheverriacarlos investigating2dand3dproximalremotesensingtechniquesforvineyardyieldestimation |