Cargando…

Does clinical testing support the current guidance definition of prolonged contact for nickel allergy?

BACKGROUND: The European Chemical Agency (ECHA) definition of prolonged contact was introduced in 2014 and has not been evaluated clinically. OBJECTIVES: To assess whether nickel‐sensitized individuals react on patch testing with high nickel‐releasing metal discs for short and repetitive periods. MA...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nixon, Rosemary L., Higgins, Claire L., Maor, Danit, Rajgopal Bala, Harini, Lalji, Alka, Heim, Katherine E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6749565/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30216527
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cod.13095
_version_ 1783452304663379968
author Nixon, Rosemary L.
Higgins, Claire L.
Maor, Danit
Rajgopal Bala, Harini
Lalji, Alka
Heim, Katherine E.
author_facet Nixon, Rosemary L.
Higgins, Claire L.
Maor, Danit
Rajgopal Bala, Harini
Lalji, Alka
Heim, Katherine E.
author_sort Nixon, Rosemary L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The European Chemical Agency (ECHA) definition of prolonged contact was introduced in 2014 and has not been evaluated clinically. OBJECTIVES: To assess whether nickel‐sensitized individuals react on patch testing with high nickel‐releasing metal discs for short and repetitive periods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We patch tested 45 nickel‐sensitized individuals double‐blind with 2 different types of high nickel‐releasing discs for 10, 30 and 60 minutes on 3 occasions over a period of 2 weeks, and for 1 longer period. Discs were tested for nickel release. RESULTS: Nickel release from both discs significantly exceeded the 0.5 μg Ni/cm(2)/week limit of the EU REACH nickel restriction. However, only 1 individual tested had a largely dose‐dependent allergic reaction. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of nickel‐allergic subjects did not react to nickel discs after 2 hours or after repetitive exposures of up to 30 minutes on 3 occasions over a period of 2 weeks. The length of time needed to cause nickel allergic contact dermatitis in most nickel‐allergic individuals is longer than the ECHA guidance definition. Longer test times are needed to define the time required to cause dermatitis in most nickel‐allergic individuals. As a limitation, the test conditions did not adequately assess real‐life factors such as friction, which is relevant for some uses of nickel.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6749565
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67495652019-09-23 Does clinical testing support the current guidance definition of prolonged contact for nickel allergy? Nixon, Rosemary L. Higgins, Claire L. Maor, Danit Rajgopal Bala, Harini Lalji, Alka Heim, Katherine E. Contact Dermatitis Original Articles BACKGROUND: The European Chemical Agency (ECHA) definition of prolonged contact was introduced in 2014 and has not been evaluated clinically. OBJECTIVES: To assess whether nickel‐sensitized individuals react on patch testing with high nickel‐releasing metal discs for short and repetitive periods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We patch tested 45 nickel‐sensitized individuals double‐blind with 2 different types of high nickel‐releasing discs for 10, 30 and 60 minutes on 3 occasions over a period of 2 weeks, and for 1 longer period. Discs were tested for nickel release. RESULTS: Nickel release from both discs significantly exceeded the 0.5 μg Ni/cm(2)/week limit of the EU REACH nickel restriction. However, only 1 individual tested had a largely dose‐dependent allergic reaction. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of nickel‐allergic subjects did not react to nickel discs after 2 hours or after repetitive exposures of up to 30 minutes on 3 occasions over a period of 2 weeks. The length of time needed to cause nickel allergic contact dermatitis in most nickel‐allergic individuals is longer than the ECHA guidance definition. Longer test times are needed to define the time required to cause dermatitis in most nickel‐allergic individuals. As a limitation, the test conditions did not adequately assess real‐life factors such as friction, which is relevant for some uses of nickel. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2018-09-14 2018-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6749565/ /pubmed/30216527 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cod.13095 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Contact Dermatitis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Nixon, Rosemary L.
Higgins, Claire L.
Maor, Danit
Rajgopal Bala, Harini
Lalji, Alka
Heim, Katherine E.
Does clinical testing support the current guidance definition of prolonged contact for nickel allergy?
title Does clinical testing support the current guidance definition of prolonged contact for nickel allergy?
title_full Does clinical testing support the current guidance definition of prolonged contact for nickel allergy?
title_fullStr Does clinical testing support the current guidance definition of prolonged contact for nickel allergy?
title_full_unstemmed Does clinical testing support the current guidance definition of prolonged contact for nickel allergy?
title_short Does clinical testing support the current guidance definition of prolonged contact for nickel allergy?
title_sort does clinical testing support the current guidance definition of prolonged contact for nickel allergy?
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6749565/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30216527
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cod.13095
work_keys_str_mv AT nixonrosemaryl doesclinicaltestingsupportthecurrentguidancedefinitionofprolongedcontactfornickelallergy
AT higginsclairel doesclinicaltestingsupportthecurrentguidancedefinitionofprolongedcontactfornickelallergy
AT maordanit doesclinicaltestingsupportthecurrentguidancedefinitionofprolongedcontactfornickelallergy
AT rajgopalbalaharini doesclinicaltestingsupportthecurrentguidancedefinitionofprolongedcontactfornickelallergy
AT laljialka doesclinicaltestingsupportthecurrentguidancedefinitionofprolongedcontactfornickelallergy
AT heimkatherinee doesclinicaltestingsupportthecurrentguidancedefinitionofprolongedcontactfornickelallergy