Cargando…

Comparison of four pharmacological strategies aimed to prevent the lung inflammation and paraquat-induced alveolar damage

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare in vivo effect of five pharmacological options on inflammation and pulmonary fibrosis induced by paraquat. METHODS: 54 Wistar SPF rats were used. After 2 h post-intoxication with paraquat ion, groups of 9 animals were randomly assigned to (1) cyclophos...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Buendía, Jefferson Antonio, Justinico Castro, José Armando, Vela, Laura Joanna Tapia, Sinisterra, Denis, Sánchez Villamil, Juana Patricia, Zuluaga Salazar, Andrés Felipe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6749662/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31533801
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-019-4598-0
_version_ 1783452323747463168
author Buendía, Jefferson Antonio
Justinico Castro, José Armando
Vela, Laura Joanna Tapia
Sinisterra, Denis
Sánchez Villamil, Juana Patricia
Zuluaga Salazar, Andrés Felipe
author_facet Buendía, Jefferson Antonio
Justinico Castro, José Armando
Vela, Laura Joanna Tapia
Sinisterra, Denis
Sánchez Villamil, Juana Patricia
Zuluaga Salazar, Andrés Felipe
author_sort Buendía, Jefferson Antonio
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare in vivo effect of five pharmacological options on inflammation and pulmonary fibrosis induced by paraquat. METHODS: 54 Wistar SPF rats were used. After 2 h post-intoxication with paraquat ion, groups of 9 animals were randomly assigned to (1) cyclophosphamide plus dexamethasone (2) low molecular weight heparin (3) unfractionated heparin (4) vitamin C every 24 h, (5) atorvastatin or (6) placebo with intraperitoneal saline. Lung inflammation, alveolar injury, hepatocyte damage, hepatic regeneration, acute tubular necrosis and kidney congestion were evaluated. RESULTS: In the control group 100% of animals presented moderate and severe lung inflammation, while in the groups with atorvastatin and intratracheal heparin this proportion was lower (55.5%; CI 26.6–81.3%) (p = 0.025). A lower degree of moderate or severe hepatic regeneration was evident in the treatment groups with atorvastatin (p = 0.009). In this study was demonstrated that statins and heparin might have a protective effect in the paraquat-induced destructive phase. More evidence is needed to evaluated of dose–response effects of these drugs before to study in clinical trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6749662
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67496622019-09-23 Comparison of four pharmacological strategies aimed to prevent the lung inflammation and paraquat-induced alveolar damage Buendía, Jefferson Antonio Justinico Castro, José Armando Vela, Laura Joanna Tapia Sinisterra, Denis Sánchez Villamil, Juana Patricia Zuluaga Salazar, Andrés Felipe BMC Res Notes Research Note OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare in vivo effect of five pharmacological options on inflammation and pulmonary fibrosis induced by paraquat. METHODS: 54 Wistar SPF rats were used. After 2 h post-intoxication with paraquat ion, groups of 9 animals were randomly assigned to (1) cyclophosphamide plus dexamethasone (2) low molecular weight heparin (3) unfractionated heparin (4) vitamin C every 24 h, (5) atorvastatin or (6) placebo with intraperitoneal saline. Lung inflammation, alveolar injury, hepatocyte damage, hepatic regeneration, acute tubular necrosis and kidney congestion were evaluated. RESULTS: In the control group 100% of animals presented moderate and severe lung inflammation, while in the groups with atorvastatin and intratracheal heparin this proportion was lower (55.5%; CI 26.6–81.3%) (p = 0.025). A lower degree of moderate or severe hepatic regeneration was evident in the treatment groups with atorvastatin (p = 0.009). In this study was demonstrated that statins and heparin might have a protective effect in the paraquat-induced destructive phase. More evidence is needed to evaluated of dose–response effects of these drugs before to study in clinical trials. BioMed Central 2019-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6749662/ /pubmed/31533801 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-019-4598-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Note
Buendía, Jefferson Antonio
Justinico Castro, José Armando
Vela, Laura Joanna Tapia
Sinisterra, Denis
Sánchez Villamil, Juana Patricia
Zuluaga Salazar, Andrés Felipe
Comparison of four pharmacological strategies aimed to prevent the lung inflammation and paraquat-induced alveolar damage
title Comparison of four pharmacological strategies aimed to prevent the lung inflammation and paraquat-induced alveolar damage
title_full Comparison of four pharmacological strategies aimed to prevent the lung inflammation and paraquat-induced alveolar damage
title_fullStr Comparison of four pharmacological strategies aimed to prevent the lung inflammation and paraquat-induced alveolar damage
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of four pharmacological strategies aimed to prevent the lung inflammation and paraquat-induced alveolar damage
title_short Comparison of four pharmacological strategies aimed to prevent the lung inflammation and paraquat-induced alveolar damage
title_sort comparison of four pharmacological strategies aimed to prevent the lung inflammation and paraquat-induced alveolar damage
topic Research Note
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6749662/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31533801
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-019-4598-0
work_keys_str_mv AT buendiajeffersonantonio comparisonoffourpharmacologicalstrategiesaimedtopreventthelunginflammationandparaquatinducedalveolardamage
AT justinicocastrojosearmando comparisonoffourpharmacologicalstrategiesaimedtopreventthelunginflammationandparaquatinducedalveolardamage
AT velalaurajoannatapia comparisonoffourpharmacologicalstrategiesaimedtopreventthelunginflammationandparaquatinducedalveolardamage
AT sinisterradenis comparisonoffourpharmacologicalstrategiesaimedtopreventthelunginflammationandparaquatinducedalveolardamage
AT sanchezvillamiljuanapatricia comparisonoffourpharmacologicalstrategiesaimedtopreventthelunginflammationandparaquatinducedalveolardamage
AT zuluagasalazarandresfelipe comparisonoffourpharmacologicalstrategiesaimedtopreventthelunginflammationandparaquatinducedalveolardamage