Cargando…

Comparative Evaluation of Plaque Removal Effectiveness of Manual and Chewable Toothbrushes in Children: A Randomized Clinical Trial

OBJECTIVE: In children, manual dexterity poses a problem with the use of manual tooth brushes (MB), resulting in inefficient plaque removal. Recently, novel chewable brushes (CB) have been introduced which could overcome this problem but are less researched in children. The objective of this study i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kayalvizhi, Gurusamy, Radha, Sarangapani, Prathima, Gajula S, Mohandoss, Suganya, Ramesh, Venkatesan, Arumugam, Selva B
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6749879/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31571781
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1604
_version_ 1783452365987250176
author Kayalvizhi, Gurusamy
Radha, Sarangapani
Prathima, Gajula S
Mohandoss, Suganya
Ramesh, Venkatesan
Arumugam, Selva B
author_facet Kayalvizhi, Gurusamy
Radha, Sarangapani
Prathima, Gajula S
Mohandoss, Suganya
Ramesh, Venkatesan
Arumugam, Selva B
author_sort Kayalvizhi, Gurusamy
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: In children, manual dexterity poses a problem with the use of manual tooth brushes (MB), resulting in inefficient plaque removal. Recently, novel chewable brushes (CB) have been introduced which could overcome this problem but are less researched in children. The objective of this study is to assess and compare the plaque removal effectiveness of CB with that of MB. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 60 patients aged 8 to 10 years were enrolled in a single-blinded randomized clinical trial. At baseline, disclosing solution was applied and the Turesky modification of the Quigley–Hein index (TQHI) plaque index and Loe and Silness gingival index were recorded. The subjects were randomly divided into two groups as group I (MB) and group II (CB) and they were instructed to use their respective brushes for a period of 1 week. For statistical comparison, the difference (prebrushing minus postbrushing) in average scores was calculated. Data were evaluated by the independent t test and paired t test, with p < 0.05. RESULTS: The overall plaque scores reduced from 1.71 ± 0.4 to 0.79 ± 0.24 when using CB and from 1.64 ± 0.64 to 1.13 ± 0.47 when using MBs. On lingual tooth surfaces, CB showed a plaque reduction of 38.70 ± 11.04 to 12.60 ± 4.79 compared to less reduction from 37.43 ± 14.26 to 28.73 ± 11.37 for MB. The overall gingival scores were also reduced from 0.33 ± 0.51 to 0.09 ± 0.07 when using CB and from 0.30 ± 0.33 to 0.19 ± 0.23 when using MB. Differences in scores between the two brushes were statistically significant (p = 0.0001). CONCLUSION: It was concluded that the experimental CB was able to remove a significant amount of plaque, particularly on the lingual surfaces, and reduced gingival index scores, thereby improving oral hygiene and gingival health status. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Kayalvizhi G, Radha S, et al. Comparative Evaluation of Plaque Removal Effectiveness of Manual and Chewable Toothbrushes in Children: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2019;12(2):107–110.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6749879
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67498792019-09-30 Comparative Evaluation of Plaque Removal Effectiveness of Manual and Chewable Toothbrushes in Children: A Randomized Clinical Trial Kayalvizhi, Gurusamy Radha, Sarangapani Prathima, Gajula S Mohandoss, Suganya Ramesh, Venkatesan Arumugam, Selva B Int J Clin Pediatr Dent Original Article OBJECTIVE: In children, manual dexterity poses a problem with the use of manual tooth brushes (MB), resulting in inefficient plaque removal. Recently, novel chewable brushes (CB) have been introduced which could overcome this problem but are less researched in children. The objective of this study is to assess and compare the plaque removal effectiveness of CB with that of MB. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 60 patients aged 8 to 10 years were enrolled in a single-blinded randomized clinical trial. At baseline, disclosing solution was applied and the Turesky modification of the Quigley–Hein index (TQHI) plaque index and Loe and Silness gingival index were recorded. The subjects were randomly divided into two groups as group I (MB) and group II (CB) and they were instructed to use their respective brushes for a period of 1 week. For statistical comparison, the difference (prebrushing minus postbrushing) in average scores was calculated. Data were evaluated by the independent t test and paired t test, with p < 0.05. RESULTS: The overall plaque scores reduced from 1.71 ± 0.4 to 0.79 ± 0.24 when using CB and from 1.64 ± 0.64 to 1.13 ± 0.47 when using MBs. On lingual tooth surfaces, CB showed a plaque reduction of 38.70 ± 11.04 to 12.60 ± 4.79 compared to less reduction from 37.43 ± 14.26 to 28.73 ± 11.37 for MB. The overall gingival scores were also reduced from 0.33 ± 0.51 to 0.09 ± 0.07 when using CB and from 0.30 ± 0.33 to 0.19 ± 0.23 when using MB. Differences in scores between the two brushes were statistically significant (p = 0.0001). CONCLUSION: It was concluded that the experimental CB was able to remove a significant amount of plaque, particularly on the lingual surfaces, and reduced gingival index scores, thereby improving oral hygiene and gingival health status. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Kayalvizhi G, Radha S, et al. Comparative Evaluation of Plaque Removal Effectiveness of Manual and Chewable Toothbrushes in Children: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2019;12(2):107–110. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6749879/ /pubmed/31571781 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1604 Text en Copyright © 2019; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kayalvizhi, Gurusamy
Radha, Sarangapani
Prathima, Gajula S
Mohandoss, Suganya
Ramesh, Venkatesan
Arumugam, Selva B
Comparative Evaluation of Plaque Removal Effectiveness of Manual and Chewable Toothbrushes in Children: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title Comparative Evaluation of Plaque Removal Effectiveness of Manual and Chewable Toothbrushes in Children: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full Comparative Evaluation of Plaque Removal Effectiveness of Manual and Chewable Toothbrushes in Children: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_fullStr Comparative Evaluation of Plaque Removal Effectiveness of Manual and Chewable Toothbrushes in Children: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Evaluation of Plaque Removal Effectiveness of Manual and Chewable Toothbrushes in Children: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_short Comparative Evaluation of Plaque Removal Effectiveness of Manual and Chewable Toothbrushes in Children: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_sort comparative evaluation of plaque removal effectiveness of manual and chewable toothbrushes in children: a randomized clinical trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6749879/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31571781
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1604
work_keys_str_mv AT kayalvizhigurusamy comparativeevaluationofplaqueremovaleffectivenessofmanualandchewabletoothbrushesinchildrenarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT radhasarangapani comparativeevaluationofplaqueremovaleffectivenessofmanualandchewabletoothbrushesinchildrenarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT prathimagajulas comparativeevaluationofplaqueremovaleffectivenessofmanualandchewabletoothbrushesinchildrenarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT mohandosssuganya comparativeevaluationofplaqueremovaleffectivenessofmanualandchewabletoothbrushesinchildrenarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT rameshvenkatesan comparativeevaluationofplaqueremovaleffectivenessofmanualandchewabletoothbrushesinchildrenarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT arumugamselvab comparativeevaluationofplaqueremovaleffectivenessofmanualandchewabletoothbrushesinchildrenarandomizedclinicaltrial