Cargando…

Effectiveness of Seven Types of Sealants: Retention after One Year

AIM: The aim of this study is to determine the retention rate and pattern of different pit and fissure sealants placed on the occlusal surface of newly erupted first permanent molars after 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy children were enrolled in this study. They divided into...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hassan, Ahmed M, Mohammed, Shukry G
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6749883/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31571779
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1600
_version_ 1783452366952988672
author Hassan, Ahmed M
Mohammed, Shukry G
author_facet Hassan, Ahmed M
Mohammed, Shukry G
author_sort Hassan, Ahmed M
collection PubMed
description AIM: The aim of this study is to determine the retention rate and pattern of different pit and fissure sealants placed on the occlusal surface of newly erupted first permanent molars after 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy children were enrolled in this study. They divided into seven groups (m = 10) according to the type of the sealant. The four permanent first molars of each child were sealed. The sealant was applied according to the instructions from the manufacturer. A clinical evaluation was carried out at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. The clinical observations were divided into three categories: total retention (TR), partial retention (PR), and total loss (TL). RESULTS: The resin-based sealant performed better than the glass ionomer-based sealant except for the Ketac Molar Easymix. At 3 months, there was no significant difference among all the tested groups (p > 0.05), while at 6, 9, and 12 months, there was a highly significant difference (p < 0.001). The glass carbomer sealant showed the least retention rate at all intervals. CONCLUSION: With an exception of the Ketac Molar Easymix, resin-based sealers performed better than glass ionomer-based sealers. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: A proper application of pit and fissure sealant will decrease the chance for caries development in newly erupted teeth. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Hassan AM, Mohammed SG. Effectiveness of Seven Types of Sealants: Retention after One Year. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2019;12(2):96–100.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6749883
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67498832019-09-30 Effectiveness of Seven Types of Sealants: Retention after One Year Hassan, Ahmed M Mohammed, Shukry G Int J Clin Pediatr Dent Original Article AIM: The aim of this study is to determine the retention rate and pattern of different pit and fissure sealants placed on the occlusal surface of newly erupted first permanent molars after 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy children were enrolled in this study. They divided into seven groups (m = 10) according to the type of the sealant. The four permanent first molars of each child were sealed. The sealant was applied according to the instructions from the manufacturer. A clinical evaluation was carried out at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. The clinical observations were divided into three categories: total retention (TR), partial retention (PR), and total loss (TL). RESULTS: The resin-based sealant performed better than the glass ionomer-based sealant except for the Ketac Molar Easymix. At 3 months, there was no significant difference among all the tested groups (p > 0.05), while at 6, 9, and 12 months, there was a highly significant difference (p < 0.001). The glass carbomer sealant showed the least retention rate at all intervals. CONCLUSION: With an exception of the Ketac Molar Easymix, resin-based sealers performed better than glass ionomer-based sealers. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: A proper application of pit and fissure sealant will decrease the chance for caries development in newly erupted teeth. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Hassan AM, Mohammed SG. Effectiveness of Seven Types of Sealants: Retention after One Year. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2019;12(2):96–100. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6749883/ /pubmed/31571779 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1600 Text en Copyright © 2019; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Original Article
Hassan, Ahmed M
Mohammed, Shukry G
Effectiveness of Seven Types of Sealants: Retention after One Year
title Effectiveness of Seven Types of Sealants: Retention after One Year
title_full Effectiveness of Seven Types of Sealants: Retention after One Year
title_fullStr Effectiveness of Seven Types of Sealants: Retention after One Year
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of Seven Types of Sealants: Retention after One Year
title_short Effectiveness of Seven Types of Sealants: Retention after One Year
title_sort effectiveness of seven types of sealants: retention after one year
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6749883/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31571779
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1600
work_keys_str_mv AT hassanahmedm effectivenessofseventypesofsealantsretentionafteroneyear
AT mohammedshukryg effectivenessofseventypesofsealantsretentionafteroneyear