Cargando…

Qualitative Exploration of Engaging Patients as Advisors in a Program of Evidence Synthesis: Cobuilding the Science to Enhance Impact

There is an increasing expectation for research to involve patient stakeholders. Yet little guidance exists regarding patient-engaged research in evidence synthesis. Embedded in a learning health care system, the Veteran Affairs Evidence Synthesis Program (ESP) provides an ideal environment for expl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gierisch, Jennifer M., Hughes, Jaime M., Williams, John W., Gordon, Adelaide M., Goldstein, Karen M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6750153/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31517795
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000001174
_version_ 1783452412825042944
author Gierisch, Jennifer M.
Hughes, Jaime M.
Williams, John W.
Gordon, Adelaide M.
Goldstein, Karen M.
author_facet Gierisch, Jennifer M.
Hughes, Jaime M.
Williams, John W.
Gordon, Adelaide M.
Goldstein, Karen M.
author_sort Gierisch, Jennifer M.
collection PubMed
description There is an increasing expectation for research to involve patient stakeholders. Yet little guidance exists regarding patient-engaged research in evidence synthesis. Embedded in a learning health care system, the Veteran Affairs Evidence Synthesis Program (ESP) provides an ideal environment for exploring patient-engaged research in a program of evidence synthesis. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to explore views, barriers, resources, and perceived values of engaging patient advisors in a national program of evidence synthesis research. METHODS: We conducted 10 qualitative interviews with ESP researchers and 2 focus groups with patient stakeholder informants. We queried for challenges to patient involvement, resources needed to overcome barriers, and perceived values of patient engagement. We analyzed qualitative data using applied thematic and matrix techniques. RESULTS: Patient stakeholders and researchers expressed positive views on the potential role for patient engagement in the Veteran Affairs ESP. Possible contributions included topic prioritization, translating findings for lay audiences, and identifying clinically important outcomes relevant to patients. There were numerous barriers to patient involvement, which were more commonly noted by ESP researchers than by patient stakeholders. Although informants were able to articulate multiple values, we found a lack of clarity around measurable outcomes of patient involvement in systematic reviews. CONCLUSIONS: The research community increasingly seeks patient input. There are many perceived and actual barriers to seeking robust patient engagement in systematic reviews. This study outlines emerging practices that other evidence synthesis programs should consider, such as the careful selection of stakeholders; codeveloped expectations and goals; and adequate training and appropriate resources to ensure meaningful engagement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6750153
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67501532019-10-07 Qualitative Exploration of Engaging Patients as Advisors in a Program of Evidence Synthesis: Cobuilding the Science to Enhance Impact Gierisch, Jennifer M. Hughes, Jaime M. Williams, John W. Gordon, Adelaide M. Goldstein, Karen M. Med Care Original Articles There is an increasing expectation for research to involve patient stakeholders. Yet little guidance exists regarding patient-engaged research in evidence synthesis. Embedded in a learning health care system, the Veteran Affairs Evidence Synthesis Program (ESP) provides an ideal environment for exploring patient-engaged research in a program of evidence synthesis. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to explore views, barriers, resources, and perceived values of engaging patient advisors in a national program of evidence synthesis research. METHODS: We conducted 10 qualitative interviews with ESP researchers and 2 focus groups with patient stakeholder informants. We queried for challenges to patient involvement, resources needed to overcome barriers, and perceived values of patient engagement. We analyzed qualitative data using applied thematic and matrix techniques. RESULTS: Patient stakeholders and researchers expressed positive views on the potential role for patient engagement in the Veteran Affairs ESP. Possible contributions included topic prioritization, translating findings for lay audiences, and identifying clinically important outcomes relevant to patients. There were numerous barriers to patient involvement, which were more commonly noted by ESP researchers than by patient stakeholders. Although informants were able to articulate multiple values, we found a lack of clarity around measurable outcomes of patient involvement in systematic reviews. CONCLUSIONS: The research community increasingly seeks patient input. There are many perceived and actual barriers to seeking robust patient engagement in systematic reviews. This study outlines emerging practices that other evidence synthesis programs should consider, such as the careful selection of stakeholders; codeveloped expectations and goals; and adequate training and appropriate resources to ensure meaningful engagement. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2019-10 2019-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6750153/ /pubmed/31517795 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000001174 Text en Written work prepared by employees of the Federal Government as part of their official duties is, under the U.S. Copyright Act, a “work of the United States Government” for which copyright protection under Title 17 of the United States Code is not available. As such, copyright does notextend to the contributions of employees of the Federal Government.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Gierisch, Jennifer M.
Hughes, Jaime M.
Williams, John W.
Gordon, Adelaide M.
Goldstein, Karen M.
Qualitative Exploration of Engaging Patients as Advisors in a Program of Evidence Synthesis: Cobuilding the Science to Enhance Impact
title Qualitative Exploration of Engaging Patients as Advisors in a Program of Evidence Synthesis: Cobuilding the Science to Enhance Impact
title_full Qualitative Exploration of Engaging Patients as Advisors in a Program of Evidence Synthesis: Cobuilding the Science to Enhance Impact
title_fullStr Qualitative Exploration of Engaging Patients as Advisors in a Program of Evidence Synthesis: Cobuilding the Science to Enhance Impact
title_full_unstemmed Qualitative Exploration of Engaging Patients as Advisors in a Program of Evidence Synthesis: Cobuilding the Science to Enhance Impact
title_short Qualitative Exploration of Engaging Patients as Advisors in a Program of Evidence Synthesis: Cobuilding the Science to Enhance Impact
title_sort qualitative exploration of engaging patients as advisors in a program of evidence synthesis: cobuilding the science to enhance impact
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6750153/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31517795
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000001174
work_keys_str_mv AT gierischjenniferm qualitativeexplorationofengagingpatientsasadvisorsinaprogramofevidencesynthesiscobuildingthesciencetoenhanceimpact
AT hughesjaimem qualitativeexplorationofengagingpatientsasadvisorsinaprogramofevidencesynthesiscobuildingthesciencetoenhanceimpact
AT williamsjohnw qualitativeexplorationofengagingpatientsasadvisorsinaprogramofevidencesynthesiscobuildingthesciencetoenhanceimpact
AT gordonadelaidem qualitativeexplorationofengagingpatientsasadvisorsinaprogramofevidencesynthesiscobuildingthesciencetoenhanceimpact
AT goldsteinkarenm qualitativeexplorationofengagingpatientsasadvisorsinaprogramofevidencesynthesiscobuildingthesciencetoenhanceimpact