Cargando…

Breast lesion size assessment in mastectomy specimens: Correlation of cone-beam breast-CT, digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography with histopathology

To compare the accuracy of breast lesion size measurement of cone-beam breast-CT (CBBCT), digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and full-field digital mammography (FFDM). Patients scheduled for mastectomy due to at least 1 malignant breast lesion were included. Mastectomy specimens were examined by CBB...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wienbeck, Susanne, Uhlig, Johannes, Fischer, Uwe, Hellriegel, Martin, von Fintel, Eva, Kulenkampff, Dietrich, Surov, Alexey, Lotz, Joachim, Perske, Christina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6750260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31517829
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000017082
_version_ 1783452429087408128
author Wienbeck, Susanne
Uhlig, Johannes
Fischer, Uwe
Hellriegel, Martin
von Fintel, Eva
Kulenkampff, Dietrich
Surov, Alexey
Lotz, Joachim
Perske, Christina
author_facet Wienbeck, Susanne
Uhlig, Johannes
Fischer, Uwe
Hellriegel, Martin
von Fintel, Eva
Kulenkampff, Dietrich
Surov, Alexey
Lotz, Joachim
Perske, Christina
author_sort Wienbeck, Susanne
collection PubMed
description To compare the accuracy of breast lesion size measurement of cone-beam breast-CT (CBBCT), digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and full-field digital mammography (FFDM). Patients scheduled for mastectomy due to at least 1 malignant breast lesion were included. Mastectomy specimens were examined by CBBCT, DBT, FFDM, and histopathology. A total of 94 lesions (40 patients) were included. Histopathological analyses revealed 47 malignant, 6 high-risk, and 41 benign lesions. Mean histopathological lesion size was 20.8 mm (range 2–100). Mean absolute size deviation from histopathology was largest for FFDM (5.3 ± 6.7 mm) and smallest for CBBCT 50 mA, high-resolution mode (4.3 ± 6.7 mm). Differences between imaging modalities did not reach statistical significance (P = .85). All imaging methods tend to overestimate breast lesion size compared to histopathological gold standard. No significant differences were found regarding size measurements, although in tendency CBBCT showed better lesion detection and cT classification over FFDM.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6750260
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67502602019-10-03 Breast lesion size assessment in mastectomy specimens: Correlation of cone-beam breast-CT, digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography with histopathology Wienbeck, Susanne Uhlig, Johannes Fischer, Uwe Hellriegel, Martin von Fintel, Eva Kulenkampff, Dietrich Surov, Alexey Lotz, Joachim Perske, Christina Medicine (Baltimore) 4100 To compare the accuracy of breast lesion size measurement of cone-beam breast-CT (CBBCT), digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and full-field digital mammography (FFDM). Patients scheduled for mastectomy due to at least 1 malignant breast lesion were included. Mastectomy specimens were examined by CBBCT, DBT, FFDM, and histopathology. A total of 94 lesions (40 patients) were included. Histopathological analyses revealed 47 malignant, 6 high-risk, and 41 benign lesions. Mean histopathological lesion size was 20.8 mm (range 2–100). Mean absolute size deviation from histopathology was largest for FFDM (5.3 ± 6.7 mm) and smallest for CBBCT 50 mA, high-resolution mode (4.3 ± 6.7 mm). Differences between imaging modalities did not reach statistical significance (P = .85). All imaging methods tend to overestimate breast lesion size compared to histopathological gold standard. No significant differences were found regarding size measurements, although in tendency CBBCT showed better lesion detection and cT classification over FFDM. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6750260/ /pubmed/31517829 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000017082 Text en Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
spellingShingle 4100
Wienbeck, Susanne
Uhlig, Johannes
Fischer, Uwe
Hellriegel, Martin
von Fintel, Eva
Kulenkampff, Dietrich
Surov, Alexey
Lotz, Joachim
Perske, Christina
Breast lesion size assessment in mastectomy specimens: Correlation of cone-beam breast-CT, digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography with histopathology
title Breast lesion size assessment in mastectomy specimens: Correlation of cone-beam breast-CT, digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography with histopathology
title_full Breast lesion size assessment in mastectomy specimens: Correlation of cone-beam breast-CT, digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography with histopathology
title_fullStr Breast lesion size assessment in mastectomy specimens: Correlation of cone-beam breast-CT, digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography with histopathology
title_full_unstemmed Breast lesion size assessment in mastectomy specimens: Correlation of cone-beam breast-CT, digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography with histopathology
title_short Breast lesion size assessment in mastectomy specimens: Correlation of cone-beam breast-CT, digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography with histopathology
title_sort breast lesion size assessment in mastectomy specimens: correlation of cone-beam breast-ct, digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography with histopathology
topic 4100
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6750260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31517829
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000017082
work_keys_str_mv AT wienbecksusanne breastlesionsizeassessmentinmastectomyspecimenscorrelationofconebeambreastctdigitalbreasttomosynthesisandfullfielddigitalmammographywithhistopathology
AT uhligjohannes breastlesionsizeassessmentinmastectomyspecimenscorrelationofconebeambreastctdigitalbreasttomosynthesisandfullfielddigitalmammographywithhistopathology
AT fischeruwe breastlesionsizeassessmentinmastectomyspecimenscorrelationofconebeambreastctdigitalbreasttomosynthesisandfullfielddigitalmammographywithhistopathology
AT hellriegelmartin breastlesionsizeassessmentinmastectomyspecimenscorrelationofconebeambreastctdigitalbreasttomosynthesisandfullfielddigitalmammographywithhistopathology
AT vonfinteleva breastlesionsizeassessmentinmastectomyspecimenscorrelationofconebeambreastctdigitalbreasttomosynthesisandfullfielddigitalmammographywithhistopathology
AT kulenkampffdietrich breastlesionsizeassessmentinmastectomyspecimenscorrelationofconebeambreastctdigitalbreasttomosynthesisandfullfielddigitalmammographywithhistopathology
AT surovalexey breastlesionsizeassessmentinmastectomyspecimenscorrelationofconebeambreastctdigitalbreasttomosynthesisandfullfielddigitalmammographywithhistopathology
AT lotzjoachim breastlesionsizeassessmentinmastectomyspecimenscorrelationofconebeambreastctdigitalbreasttomosynthesisandfullfielddigitalmammographywithhistopathology
AT perskechristina breastlesionsizeassessmentinmastectomyspecimenscorrelationofconebeambreastctdigitalbreasttomosynthesisandfullfielddigitalmammographywithhistopathology