Cargando…

Burnout among doctors in China through 2018: A protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Burnout negatively impacts the mental and physical health doctors. More seriously, it leads to poor patient care. In China, the situation is severe and more efforts are needed to reveal the epidemiological characteristics of doctor burnout to develop improved strategies of alleviating it...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zheng, Qin, Yang, Kun, Wang, Xue, Ou, Zhenghang, Su, Xiaopeng, Zhang, Jing, Qu, Miao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6750315/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31517849
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000017117
_version_ 1783452438665101312
author Zheng, Qin
Yang, Kun
Wang, Xue
Ou, Zhenghang
Su, Xiaopeng
Zhang, Jing
Qu, Miao
author_facet Zheng, Qin
Yang, Kun
Wang, Xue
Ou, Zhenghang
Su, Xiaopeng
Zhang, Jing
Qu, Miao
author_sort Zheng, Qin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Burnout negatively impacts the mental and physical health doctors. More seriously, it leads to poor patient care. In China, the situation is severe and more efforts are needed to reveal the epidemiological characteristics of doctor burnout to develop improved strategies of alleviating it. Due to the large number of heterogeneous and sample size-restricted surveys currently published, meta-analysis and systematic reviews are critical to a thorough understanding of burnout among Chinese doctors. METHODS: The Cochrane Collaboration criteria and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) will be followed to conduct and report the systematic review. We will conduct a comprehensive search on the data bases of China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), WanFang, PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Library from their inception to December 2018. Prospective cohort and cross-sectional studies that described the prevalence of Chinese doctors’ prevalence will be eligible for inclusion. The risk of bias and methodological quality of the included studies will be assessed using a risk of bias tool and the Cochrane guidelines for observational studies. A generalized linear mixed model framework with the Poisson likelihood and the log link function will be used to access the incidence rate ratio. Multivariate Poisson regression framework will be conducted to adjust modeling heterogeneity and confounders, like difference regions and time periods. The risk of bias, heterogeneity, and quality of evidence will be assessed in accordance with the aforementioned guidelines. RESULTS: The primary outcome will be the prevalence and distribution of 3 dimension of burnout in Chinese doctors, and the second will be the difference of prevalence between difference regions and time periods. DISCUSSION: This systematic review and meta-analysis will help us to reveal the prevalence, characteristics, timeline, and correlation between these factors in burnout; we expect our work may provide a scientific basis for further prevention and intervention of burnout in Chinese doctors, eventually to improve the quality of health care. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018104249.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6750315
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67503152019-10-03 Burnout among doctors in China through 2018: A protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis Zheng, Qin Yang, Kun Wang, Xue Ou, Zhenghang Su, Xiaopeng Zhang, Jing Qu, Miao Medicine (Baltimore) 6500 BACKGROUND: Burnout negatively impacts the mental and physical health doctors. More seriously, it leads to poor patient care. In China, the situation is severe and more efforts are needed to reveal the epidemiological characteristics of doctor burnout to develop improved strategies of alleviating it. Due to the large number of heterogeneous and sample size-restricted surveys currently published, meta-analysis and systematic reviews are critical to a thorough understanding of burnout among Chinese doctors. METHODS: The Cochrane Collaboration criteria and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) will be followed to conduct and report the systematic review. We will conduct a comprehensive search on the data bases of China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), WanFang, PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Library from their inception to December 2018. Prospective cohort and cross-sectional studies that described the prevalence of Chinese doctors’ prevalence will be eligible for inclusion. The risk of bias and methodological quality of the included studies will be assessed using a risk of bias tool and the Cochrane guidelines for observational studies. A generalized linear mixed model framework with the Poisson likelihood and the log link function will be used to access the incidence rate ratio. Multivariate Poisson regression framework will be conducted to adjust modeling heterogeneity and confounders, like difference regions and time periods. The risk of bias, heterogeneity, and quality of evidence will be assessed in accordance with the aforementioned guidelines. RESULTS: The primary outcome will be the prevalence and distribution of 3 dimension of burnout in Chinese doctors, and the second will be the difference of prevalence between difference regions and time periods. DISCUSSION: This systematic review and meta-analysis will help us to reveal the prevalence, characteristics, timeline, and correlation between these factors in burnout; we expect our work may provide a scientific basis for further prevention and intervention of burnout in Chinese doctors, eventually to improve the quality of health care. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018104249. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6750315/ /pubmed/31517849 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000017117 Text en Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle 6500
Zheng, Qin
Yang, Kun
Wang, Xue
Ou, Zhenghang
Su, Xiaopeng
Zhang, Jing
Qu, Miao
Burnout among doctors in China through 2018: A protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis
title Burnout among doctors in China through 2018: A protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Burnout among doctors in China through 2018: A protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Burnout among doctors in China through 2018: A protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Burnout among doctors in China through 2018: A protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Burnout among doctors in China through 2018: A protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort burnout among doctors in china through 2018: a protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis
topic 6500
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6750315/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31517849
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000017117
work_keys_str_mv AT zhengqin burnoutamongdoctorsinchinathrough2018aprotocolofsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yangkun burnoutamongdoctorsinchinathrough2018aprotocolofsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangxue burnoutamongdoctorsinchinathrough2018aprotocolofsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ouzhenghang burnoutamongdoctorsinchinathrough2018aprotocolofsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT suxiaopeng burnoutamongdoctorsinchinathrough2018aprotocolofsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhangjing burnoutamongdoctorsinchinathrough2018aprotocolofsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT qumiao burnoutamongdoctorsinchinathrough2018aprotocolofsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis