Cargando…

Communicating Science in the Digital and Social Media Ecosystem: Scoping Review and Typology of Strategies Used by Health Scientists

BACKGROUND: The public’s understanding of science can be influential in a wide range of areas related to public health, including policy making and self-care. Through the digital and social media ecosystem, health scientists play a growing role in public science communication (SC). OBJECTIVE: This r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fontaine, Guillaume, Maheu-Cadotte, Marc-André, Lavallée, Andréane, Mailhot, Tanya, Rouleau, Geneviève, Bouix-Picasso, Julien, Bourbonnais, Anne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6751098/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31482854
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/14447
_version_ 1783452554066132992
author Fontaine, Guillaume
Maheu-Cadotte, Marc-André
Lavallée, Andréane
Mailhot, Tanya
Rouleau, Geneviève
Bouix-Picasso, Julien
Bourbonnais, Anne
author_facet Fontaine, Guillaume
Maheu-Cadotte, Marc-André
Lavallée, Andréane
Mailhot, Tanya
Rouleau, Geneviève
Bouix-Picasso, Julien
Bourbonnais, Anne
author_sort Fontaine, Guillaume
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The public’s understanding of science can be influential in a wide range of areas related to public health, including policy making and self-care. Through the digital and social media ecosystem, health scientists play a growing role in public science communication (SC). OBJECTIVE: This review aimed to (1) synthesize the literature on SC initiated by health scientists targeting the public in the digital and social media ecosystem and (2) describe the SC strategies and communication channels used. METHODS: This scoping review was based on the Joanna Briggs Institute Methodological Framework. A systematic search was performed in 6 databases (January 2000 to April 2018). Title and abstract screening, full-text review, data charting, and critical appraisal were performed independently by two review authors. Data regarding included studies and communication channels were synthesized descriptively. A typology of SC strategies was developed using a qualitative and inductive method of data synthesis. RESULTS: Among 960 unique publications identified, 18 met inclusion criteria. A third of publications scored good quality (6/18, 33%), half scored moderate quality (9/18, 50%), and less than a fifth scored low quality (3/18, 16%). Overall, 75 SC strategies used by health scientists were identified. These were grouped into 9 types: content, credibility, engagement, intention, linguistics, planification, presentation, social exchange, and statistics. A total of 5 types of communication channels were identified: social networking platforms (eg, Twitter), content-sharing platforms (eg, YouTube), digital research communities (eg, ResearchGate), personal blogs and websites (eg, WordPress), and social news aggregation and discussion platforms (eg, Reddit). CONCLUSIONS: Evidence suggests that multiple types of SC strategies and communication channels are used by health scientists concurrently. Few empirical studies have been conducted on SC by health scientists in the digital and social media ecosystem. Future studies should examine the appropriateness and effectiveness of SC strategies for improving public health–related outcomes and identify the barriers, facilitators, and ethical considerations inherent to the involvement of health scientists in the digital and social media ecosystem.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6751098
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67510982019-09-23 Communicating Science in the Digital and Social Media Ecosystem: Scoping Review and Typology of Strategies Used by Health Scientists Fontaine, Guillaume Maheu-Cadotte, Marc-André Lavallée, Andréane Mailhot, Tanya Rouleau, Geneviève Bouix-Picasso, Julien Bourbonnais, Anne JMIR Public Health Surveill Review BACKGROUND: The public’s understanding of science can be influential in a wide range of areas related to public health, including policy making and self-care. Through the digital and social media ecosystem, health scientists play a growing role in public science communication (SC). OBJECTIVE: This review aimed to (1) synthesize the literature on SC initiated by health scientists targeting the public in the digital and social media ecosystem and (2) describe the SC strategies and communication channels used. METHODS: This scoping review was based on the Joanna Briggs Institute Methodological Framework. A systematic search was performed in 6 databases (January 2000 to April 2018). Title and abstract screening, full-text review, data charting, and critical appraisal were performed independently by two review authors. Data regarding included studies and communication channels were synthesized descriptively. A typology of SC strategies was developed using a qualitative and inductive method of data synthesis. RESULTS: Among 960 unique publications identified, 18 met inclusion criteria. A third of publications scored good quality (6/18, 33%), half scored moderate quality (9/18, 50%), and less than a fifth scored low quality (3/18, 16%). Overall, 75 SC strategies used by health scientists were identified. These were grouped into 9 types: content, credibility, engagement, intention, linguistics, planification, presentation, social exchange, and statistics. A total of 5 types of communication channels were identified: social networking platforms (eg, Twitter), content-sharing platforms (eg, YouTube), digital research communities (eg, ResearchGate), personal blogs and websites (eg, WordPress), and social news aggregation and discussion platforms (eg, Reddit). CONCLUSIONS: Evidence suggests that multiple types of SC strategies and communication channels are used by health scientists concurrently. Few empirical studies have been conducted on SC by health scientists in the digital and social media ecosystem. Future studies should examine the appropriateness and effectiveness of SC strategies for improving public health–related outcomes and identify the barriers, facilitators, and ethical considerations inherent to the involvement of health scientists in the digital and social media ecosystem. JMIR Publications 2019-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6751098/ /pubmed/31482854 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/14447 Text en ©Guillaume Fontaine, Marc-André Maheu-Cadotte, Andréane Lavallée, Tanya Mailhot, Geneviève Rouleau, Julien Bouix-Picasso, Anne Bourbonnais. Originally published in JMIR Public Health and Surveillance (http://publichealth.jmir.org), 03.09.2019. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Public Health and Surveillance, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://publichealth.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Review
Fontaine, Guillaume
Maheu-Cadotte, Marc-André
Lavallée, Andréane
Mailhot, Tanya
Rouleau, Geneviève
Bouix-Picasso, Julien
Bourbonnais, Anne
Communicating Science in the Digital and Social Media Ecosystem: Scoping Review and Typology of Strategies Used by Health Scientists
title Communicating Science in the Digital and Social Media Ecosystem: Scoping Review and Typology of Strategies Used by Health Scientists
title_full Communicating Science in the Digital and Social Media Ecosystem: Scoping Review and Typology of Strategies Used by Health Scientists
title_fullStr Communicating Science in the Digital and Social Media Ecosystem: Scoping Review and Typology of Strategies Used by Health Scientists
title_full_unstemmed Communicating Science in the Digital and Social Media Ecosystem: Scoping Review and Typology of Strategies Used by Health Scientists
title_short Communicating Science in the Digital and Social Media Ecosystem: Scoping Review and Typology of Strategies Used by Health Scientists
title_sort communicating science in the digital and social media ecosystem: scoping review and typology of strategies used by health scientists
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6751098/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31482854
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/14447
work_keys_str_mv AT fontaineguillaume communicatingscienceinthedigitalandsocialmediaecosystemscopingreviewandtypologyofstrategiesusedbyhealthscientists
AT maheucadottemarcandre communicatingscienceinthedigitalandsocialmediaecosystemscopingreviewandtypologyofstrategiesusedbyhealthscientists
AT lavalleeandreane communicatingscienceinthedigitalandsocialmediaecosystemscopingreviewandtypologyofstrategiesusedbyhealthscientists
AT mailhottanya communicatingscienceinthedigitalandsocialmediaecosystemscopingreviewandtypologyofstrategiesusedbyhealthscientists
AT rouleaugenevieve communicatingscienceinthedigitalandsocialmediaecosystemscopingreviewandtypologyofstrategiesusedbyhealthscientists
AT bouixpicassojulien communicatingscienceinthedigitalandsocialmediaecosystemscopingreviewandtypologyofstrategiesusedbyhealthscientists
AT bourbonnaisanne communicatingscienceinthedigitalandsocialmediaecosystemscopingreviewandtypologyofstrategiesusedbyhealthscientists