Cargando…
EEG dynamics reveal a dissociation between storage and selective attention within working memory
Selective attention plays a prominent role in prioritizing information in working memory (WM), improving performance for attended representations. However, it remains unclear whether unattended WM representations suffer from information loss. Here we tested the hypothesis that within WM, selectively...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6751203/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31534150 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-49577-0 |
_version_ | 1783452572467593216 |
---|---|
author | Günseli, Eren Fahrenfort, Johannes Jacobus van Moorselaar, Dirk Daoultzis, Konstantinos Christos Meeter, Martijn Olivers, Christian N. L. |
author_facet | Günseli, Eren Fahrenfort, Johannes Jacobus van Moorselaar, Dirk Daoultzis, Konstantinos Christos Meeter, Martijn Olivers, Christian N. L. |
author_sort | Günseli, Eren |
collection | PubMed |
description | Selective attention plays a prominent role in prioritizing information in working memory (WM), improving performance for attended representations. However, it remains unclear whether unattended WM representations suffer from information loss. Here we tested the hypothesis that within WM, selectively attending to an item and stopping storing other items are independent mechanisms. We recorded EEG while participants performed a WM recall task in which the item most likely to be tested was cued retrospectively during retention. By manipulating retro-cue reliability (i.e., the ratio of valid to invalid cue trials), we varied the incentive to retain non-cued items. Storage and selective attention in WM were measured during the retention interval by contralateral delay activity (CDA) and contralateral alpha power suppression, respectively. Soon after highly reliable cues, the cued item was attended, and non-cued items suffered information loss. However, for less reliable cues, initially the cued item was attended, but unattended items were kept in WM. Later during the delay, previously unattended items suffered information loss despite now attention being reallocated to their locations, presumably to strengthen their weakening traces. These results show that storage and attention in WM are distinct processes that can behave differently depending on the relative importance of representations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6751203 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67512032019-09-30 EEG dynamics reveal a dissociation between storage and selective attention within working memory Günseli, Eren Fahrenfort, Johannes Jacobus van Moorselaar, Dirk Daoultzis, Konstantinos Christos Meeter, Martijn Olivers, Christian N. L. Sci Rep Article Selective attention plays a prominent role in prioritizing information in working memory (WM), improving performance for attended representations. However, it remains unclear whether unattended WM representations suffer from information loss. Here we tested the hypothesis that within WM, selectively attending to an item and stopping storing other items are independent mechanisms. We recorded EEG while participants performed a WM recall task in which the item most likely to be tested was cued retrospectively during retention. By manipulating retro-cue reliability (i.e., the ratio of valid to invalid cue trials), we varied the incentive to retain non-cued items. Storage and selective attention in WM were measured during the retention interval by contralateral delay activity (CDA) and contralateral alpha power suppression, respectively. Soon after highly reliable cues, the cued item was attended, and non-cued items suffered information loss. However, for less reliable cues, initially the cued item was attended, but unattended items were kept in WM. Later during the delay, previously unattended items suffered information loss despite now attention being reallocated to their locations, presumably to strengthen their weakening traces. These results show that storage and attention in WM are distinct processes that can behave differently depending on the relative importance of representations. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6751203/ /pubmed/31534150 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-49577-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Günseli, Eren Fahrenfort, Johannes Jacobus van Moorselaar, Dirk Daoultzis, Konstantinos Christos Meeter, Martijn Olivers, Christian N. L. EEG dynamics reveal a dissociation between storage and selective attention within working memory |
title | EEG dynamics reveal a dissociation between storage and selective attention within working memory |
title_full | EEG dynamics reveal a dissociation between storage and selective attention within working memory |
title_fullStr | EEG dynamics reveal a dissociation between storage and selective attention within working memory |
title_full_unstemmed | EEG dynamics reveal a dissociation between storage and selective attention within working memory |
title_short | EEG dynamics reveal a dissociation between storage and selective attention within working memory |
title_sort | eeg dynamics reveal a dissociation between storage and selective attention within working memory |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6751203/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31534150 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-49577-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gunselieren eegdynamicsrevealadissociationbetweenstorageandselectiveattentionwithinworkingmemory AT fahrenfortjohannesjacobus eegdynamicsrevealadissociationbetweenstorageandselectiveattentionwithinworkingmemory AT vanmoorselaardirk eegdynamicsrevealadissociationbetweenstorageandselectiveattentionwithinworkingmemory AT daoultziskonstantinoschristos eegdynamicsrevealadissociationbetweenstorageandselectiveattentionwithinworkingmemory AT meetermartijn eegdynamicsrevealadissociationbetweenstorageandselectiveattentionwithinworkingmemory AT oliverschristiannl eegdynamicsrevealadissociationbetweenstorageandselectiveattentionwithinworkingmemory |