Cargando…

Emergency Department Workload and Crowding During a Major Electronic Health Record Breakdown

Background: Emergency Departments (EDs) today rely heavily on Electronic Health Records (EHRs) and associated support systems. EHR updates are known to be associated with adverse events, but reports on the consequences of breakdowns in EDs are lacking. Objectives: To describe the effects on workload...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wretborn, Jens, Ekelund, Ulf, Wilhelms, Daniel B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6751245/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31572707
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2019.00267
_version_ 1783452582205718528
author Wretborn, Jens
Ekelund, Ulf
Wilhelms, Daniel B.
author_facet Wretborn, Jens
Ekelund, Ulf
Wilhelms, Daniel B.
author_sort Wretborn, Jens
collection PubMed
description Background: Emergency Departments (EDs) today rely heavily on Electronic Health Records (EHRs) and associated support systems. EHR updates are known to be associated with adverse events, but reports on the consequences of breakdowns in EDs are lacking. Objectives: To describe the effects on workload, occupancy, patient Length Of Stay (LOS), and admissions at three EDs (a regional trauma center, a community hospital and a rural community hospital) during a 96 h period of EHR downtime, of which 48 h represented an unexpected breakdown. Methods: Assessments of workload, on a scale from 1 (no workload) to 6 (very high workload), were obtained from all staff before, during and after the downtime period. Occupancy, LOS and hospital admissions were extracted from data recorded in the fallback system at each ED during the downtime, and compared with the period before and after (uptime). Results: Workload increased considerably at two EDs during the downtime whereas the third ED lacked resources to assess workload due to the breakdown. The proportion of assessments ≥4 were 28.5% during uptime compared to 38.4% during downtime at the regional trauma center ED (difference 9.9%, p = 0.006, 95% CI 2.7–17%), and 22.9% compared to 41% at the rural community ED (difference 18.1%, p = 0.0002, 95%CI 7.9–28.3%). Median LOS increased by 19 min (3:56 vs. 4:15, p < 0.004) at the regional trauma center ED, by 76 min (3:34 vs. 4:50, p < 0.001) at the community ED and was unaltered at the rural community ED (2:47 vs. 2:51, p = 0.3) during downtime. Occupancy increased significantly at the community ED (1.59 vs. 0.71, p < 0.0001). Admissions rates remained unchanged during the breakdown. Fallback systems and initiatives to manage the effects of the breakdown differed between the EDs. Conclusions: EHR downtime or unexpected breakdowns increased staff workload, and had variable effects on ED crowding as measured by LOS and occupancy. Additional staff and digital fallback systems may reduce the effects on ED crowding, but this descriptive study cannot determine causality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6751245
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67512452019-09-30 Emergency Department Workload and Crowding During a Major Electronic Health Record Breakdown Wretborn, Jens Ekelund, Ulf Wilhelms, Daniel B. Front Public Health Public Health Background: Emergency Departments (EDs) today rely heavily on Electronic Health Records (EHRs) and associated support systems. EHR updates are known to be associated with adverse events, but reports on the consequences of breakdowns in EDs are lacking. Objectives: To describe the effects on workload, occupancy, patient Length Of Stay (LOS), and admissions at three EDs (a regional trauma center, a community hospital and a rural community hospital) during a 96 h period of EHR downtime, of which 48 h represented an unexpected breakdown. Methods: Assessments of workload, on a scale from 1 (no workload) to 6 (very high workload), were obtained from all staff before, during and after the downtime period. Occupancy, LOS and hospital admissions were extracted from data recorded in the fallback system at each ED during the downtime, and compared with the period before and after (uptime). Results: Workload increased considerably at two EDs during the downtime whereas the third ED lacked resources to assess workload due to the breakdown. The proportion of assessments ≥4 were 28.5% during uptime compared to 38.4% during downtime at the regional trauma center ED (difference 9.9%, p = 0.006, 95% CI 2.7–17%), and 22.9% compared to 41% at the rural community ED (difference 18.1%, p = 0.0002, 95%CI 7.9–28.3%). Median LOS increased by 19 min (3:56 vs. 4:15, p < 0.004) at the regional trauma center ED, by 76 min (3:34 vs. 4:50, p < 0.001) at the community ED and was unaltered at the rural community ED (2:47 vs. 2:51, p = 0.3) during downtime. Occupancy increased significantly at the community ED (1.59 vs. 0.71, p < 0.0001). Admissions rates remained unchanged during the breakdown. Fallback systems and initiatives to manage the effects of the breakdown differed between the EDs. Conclusions: EHR downtime or unexpected breakdowns increased staff workload, and had variable effects on ED crowding as measured by LOS and occupancy. Additional staff and digital fallback systems may reduce the effects on ED crowding, but this descriptive study cannot determine causality. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6751245/ /pubmed/31572707 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2019.00267 Text en Copyright © 2019 Wretborn, Ekelund and Wilhelms. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Public Health
Wretborn, Jens
Ekelund, Ulf
Wilhelms, Daniel B.
Emergency Department Workload and Crowding During a Major Electronic Health Record Breakdown
title Emergency Department Workload and Crowding During a Major Electronic Health Record Breakdown
title_full Emergency Department Workload and Crowding During a Major Electronic Health Record Breakdown
title_fullStr Emergency Department Workload and Crowding During a Major Electronic Health Record Breakdown
title_full_unstemmed Emergency Department Workload and Crowding During a Major Electronic Health Record Breakdown
title_short Emergency Department Workload and Crowding During a Major Electronic Health Record Breakdown
title_sort emergency department workload and crowding during a major electronic health record breakdown
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6751245/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31572707
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2019.00267
work_keys_str_mv AT wretbornjens emergencydepartmentworkloadandcrowdingduringamajorelectronichealthrecordbreakdown
AT ekelundulf emergencydepartmentworkloadandcrowdingduringamajorelectronichealthrecordbreakdown
AT wilhelmsdanielb emergencydepartmentworkloadandcrowdingduringamajorelectronichealthrecordbreakdown