Cargando…
How In-Group Bias Influences Source Memory for Words Learned From In-Group and Out-Group Speakers
Individuals rapidly extract information about others’ social identity, including whether or not they belong to their in-group. Group membership status has been shown to affect how attentively people encode information conveyed by those others. These findings are highly relevant for the field of psyc...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6751324/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31572148 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00308 |
_version_ | 1783452600667996160 |
---|---|
author | Iacozza, Sara Meyer, Antje S. Lev-Ari, Shiri |
author_facet | Iacozza, Sara Meyer, Antje S. Lev-Ari, Shiri |
author_sort | Iacozza, Sara |
collection | PubMed |
description | Individuals rapidly extract information about others’ social identity, including whether or not they belong to their in-group. Group membership status has been shown to affect how attentively people encode information conveyed by those others. These findings are highly relevant for the field of psycholinguistics where there exists an open debate on how words are represented in the mental lexicon and how abstract or context-specific these representations are. Here, we used a novel word learning paradigm to test our proposal that the group membership status of speakers also affects how speaker-specific representations of novel words are. Participants learned new words from speakers who either attended their own university (in-group speakers) or did not (out-group speakers) and performed a task to measure their individual in-group bias. Then, their source memory of the new words was tested in a recognition test to probe the speaker-specific content of the novel lexical representations and assess how it related to individual in-group biases. We found that speaker group membership and participants’ in-group bias affected participants’ decision biases. The stronger the in-group bias, the more cautious participants were in their decisions. This was particularly applied to in-group related decisions. These findings indicate that social biases can influence recognition threshold. Taking a broader scope, defining how information is represented is a topic of great overlap between the fields of memory and psycholinguistics. Nevertheless, researchers from these fields tend to stay within the theoretical and methodological borders of their own field, missing the chance to deepen their understanding of phenomena that are of common interest. Here, we show how methodologies developed in the memory field can be implemented in language research to shed light on an important theoretical issue that relates to the composition of lexical representations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6751324 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67513242019-09-30 How In-Group Bias Influences Source Memory for Words Learned From In-Group and Out-Group Speakers Iacozza, Sara Meyer, Antje S. Lev-Ari, Shiri Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Individuals rapidly extract information about others’ social identity, including whether or not they belong to their in-group. Group membership status has been shown to affect how attentively people encode information conveyed by those others. These findings are highly relevant for the field of psycholinguistics where there exists an open debate on how words are represented in the mental lexicon and how abstract or context-specific these representations are. Here, we used a novel word learning paradigm to test our proposal that the group membership status of speakers also affects how speaker-specific representations of novel words are. Participants learned new words from speakers who either attended their own university (in-group speakers) or did not (out-group speakers) and performed a task to measure their individual in-group bias. Then, their source memory of the new words was tested in a recognition test to probe the speaker-specific content of the novel lexical representations and assess how it related to individual in-group biases. We found that speaker group membership and participants’ in-group bias affected participants’ decision biases. The stronger the in-group bias, the more cautious participants were in their decisions. This was particularly applied to in-group related decisions. These findings indicate that social biases can influence recognition threshold. Taking a broader scope, defining how information is represented is a topic of great overlap between the fields of memory and psycholinguistics. Nevertheless, researchers from these fields tend to stay within the theoretical and methodological borders of their own field, missing the chance to deepen their understanding of phenomena that are of common interest. Here, we show how methodologies developed in the memory field can be implemented in language research to shed light on an important theoretical issue that relates to the composition of lexical representations. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6751324/ /pubmed/31572148 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00308 Text en Copyright © 2019 Iacozza, Meyer and Lev-Ari. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Iacozza, Sara Meyer, Antje S. Lev-Ari, Shiri How In-Group Bias Influences Source Memory for Words Learned From In-Group and Out-Group Speakers |
title | How In-Group Bias Influences Source Memory for Words Learned From In-Group and Out-Group Speakers |
title_full | How In-Group Bias Influences Source Memory for Words Learned From In-Group and Out-Group Speakers |
title_fullStr | How In-Group Bias Influences Source Memory for Words Learned From In-Group and Out-Group Speakers |
title_full_unstemmed | How In-Group Bias Influences Source Memory for Words Learned From In-Group and Out-Group Speakers |
title_short | How In-Group Bias Influences Source Memory for Words Learned From In-Group and Out-Group Speakers |
title_sort | how in-group bias influences source memory for words learned from in-group and out-group speakers |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6751324/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31572148 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00308 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT iacozzasara howingroupbiasinfluencessourcememoryforwordslearnedfromingroupandoutgroupspeakers AT meyerantjes howingroupbiasinfluencessourcememoryforwordslearnedfromingroupandoutgroupspeakers AT levarishiri howingroupbiasinfluencessourcememoryforwordslearnedfromingroupandoutgroupspeakers |