Cargando…

Comparison of different quantification methods for (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography studies in rat brains

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate several methods to estimate glucose consumption in the male Wister rat brain as measured by PET. METHODS: Fourteen male Wistar normoglycemic rats were studied. The input function consisted of seventeen blood samples drawn manually from the femoral artery. Glu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Prando, Silvana, de Godoi Carneiro, Camila, Robilotta, Cecil Chow, Sapienza, Marcelo Tatit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6751369/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31576919
http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2019/e1273
_version_ 1783452609852473344
author Prando, Silvana
de Godoi Carneiro, Camila
Robilotta, Cecil Chow
Sapienza, Marcelo Tatit
author_facet Prando, Silvana
de Godoi Carneiro, Camila
Robilotta, Cecil Chow
Sapienza, Marcelo Tatit
author_sort Prando, Silvana
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate several methods to estimate glucose consumption in the male Wister rat brain as measured by PET. METHODS: Fourteen male Wistar normoglycemic rats were studied. The input function consisted of seventeen blood samples drawn manually from the femoral artery. Glucose uptake values were calculated using the input function resulting from the arterial blood samples and the tissue time-activity curve derived from the PET images. The estimated glucose consumption rate (K(i)) based on the 2-tissue compartment model (2TCM) served as the standard for comparisons with the values calculated by the Patlak analysis and with the fractional uptake rate (FUR), standardized uptake value (SUV) and glucose corrected SUV (SUV(glu)). RESULTS: No significant difference between the standard K(i) and the Patlak K(i) was observed. The standard K(i) was also found to have strong correlations and concordance with the K(i) value estimated by the Patlak analysis. The FUR method presented an excellent correlation with the K(i) value obtained by the 2TCM/Patlak analyses, in contrast to the SUV or SUV(glu). CONCLUSIONS: From a methodological point of view, the present findings confirm the theoretical limitations of the cerebral SUV and SUV(glu) as a substitute for K(i) in the estimation of glucose consumption in the brain. Our data suggest that the FUR is the surrogate to K(i).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6751369
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67513692019-10-03 Comparison of different quantification methods for (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography studies in rat brains Prando, Silvana de Godoi Carneiro, Camila Robilotta, Cecil Chow Sapienza, Marcelo Tatit Clinics (Sao Paulo) Original Article OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate several methods to estimate glucose consumption in the male Wister rat brain as measured by PET. METHODS: Fourteen male Wistar normoglycemic rats were studied. The input function consisted of seventeen blood samples drawn manually from the femoral artery. Glucose uptake values were calculated using the input function resulting from the arterial blood samples and the tissue time-activity curve derived from the PET images. The estimated glucose consumption rate (K(i)) based on the 2-tissue compartment model (2TCM) served as the standard for comparisons with the values calculated by the Patlak analysis and with the fractional uptake rate (FUR), standardized uptake value (SUV) and glucose corrected SUV (SUV(glu)). RESULTS: No significant difference between the standard K(i) and the Patlak K(i) was observed. The standard K(i) was also found to have strong correlations and concordance with the K(i) value estimated by the Patlak analysis. The FUR method presented an excellent correlation with the K(i) value obtained by the 2TCM/Patlak analyses, in contrast to the SUV or SUV(glu). CONCLUSIONS: From a methodological point of view, the present findings confirm the theoretical limitations of the cerebral SUV and SUV(glu) as a substitute for K(i) in the estimation of glucose consumption in the brain. Our data suggest that the FUR is the surrogate to K(i). Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo 2019-09-19 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6751369/ /pubmed/31576919 http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2019/e1273 Text en Copyright © 2019 CLINICS http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Prando, Silvana
de Godoi Carneiro, Camila
Robilotta, Cecil Chow
Sapienza, Marcelo Tatit
Comparison of different quantification methods for (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography studies in rat brains
title Comparison of different quantification methods for (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography studies in rat brains
title_full Comparison of different quantification methods for (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography studies in rat brains
title_fullStr Comparison of different quantification methods for (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography studies in rat brains
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of different quantification methods for (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography studies in rat brains
title_short Comparison of different quantification methods for (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography studies in rat brains
title_sort comparison of different quantification methods for (18)f-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography studies in rat brains
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6751369/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31576919
http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2019/e1273
work_keys_str_mv AT prandosilvana comparisonofdifferentquantificationmethodsfor18ffluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographystudiesinratbrains
AT degodoicarneirocamila comparisonofdifferentquantificationmethodsfor18ffluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographystudiesinratbrains
AT robilottacecilchow comparisonofdifferentquantificationmethodsfor18ffluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographystudiesinratbrains
AT sapienzamarcelotatit comparisonofdifferentquantificationmethodsfor18ffluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographystudiesinratbrains