Cargando…

C-banding and AgNOR-staining were still effective complementary methods to indentify chromosomal heteromorphisms and some structural abnormalities in prenatal diagnosis

BACKGROUND: In prenatal diagnosis, CMA has begun to emerge as a favorable alternative to karyotype analysis, but it could not identify balanced translocations, triploidies, inversion and heteromorphisms. Therefore, conventional cytogenetic and specific staining methods still play an important role i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhu, Jian Jiang, Qi, Hong, Cai, Li Rong, Wen, Xiao Hui, Zeng, Wen, Tang, Guo Dong, Luo, Yao, Meng, Ran, Mao, Xue Qun, Zhang, Shao Qin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6751659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31548869
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13039-019-0453-1
_version_ 1783452654419050496
author Zhu, Jian Jiang
Qi, Hong
Cai, Li Rong
Wen, Xiao Hui
Zeng, Wen
Tang, Guo Dong
Luo, Yao
Meng, Ran
Mao, Xue Qun
Zhang, Shao Qin
author_facet Zhu, Jian Jiang
Qi, Hong
Cai, Li Rong
Wen, Xiao Hui
Zeng, Wen
Tang, Guo Dong
Luo, Yao
Meng, Ran
Mao, Xue Qun
Zhang, Shao Qin
author_sort Zhu, Jian Jiang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In prenatal diagnosis, CMA has begun to emerge as a favorable alternative to karyotype analysis, but it could not identify balanced translocations, triploidies, inversion and heteromorphisms. Therefore, conventional cytogenetic and specific staining methods still play an important role in the work-up of chromosome anomaly. This study investigated the application of C-banding and AgNOR-staining techniques in prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal heteromorphisms and some structure abnormalities. RESULTS: Among the 2970 samples, the incidence of chromosomal heteromorphisms was 8.79% (261/2970). The most frequent was found to be chromosome Y (2.93%, 87/2970), followed by chromosome 1 (1.65 %, 49/2970), 9 (1.52 %, 45/2970), 22 (0.77 %, 23/2970) and 15 (0.64 %, 19/2970). We compared the incidence of chromosomal heteromorphisms between recurrent spontaneous abortion (RSA) group and control group. The frequency of autosomal hetermorphisms in RSA group was 7.63% higher than that in control group (5.78%), while the frequency of Y chromosomal heteromorphisms was 4.76% lower than that in control group (5.71%). Here we summarized 4 representative cases, inv (1) (p12q24), psu dic (4;17) (p16.3;p13.3), r(X)(p11; q21) and an isodicentric bisatellited chromosome to illustrate the application of C-banding or AgNOR-staining, CMA or NGS was performed to detect CNVs if necessary. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicated that C-banding and AgNOR-staining were still effective complementary methods to identify chromosomal heteromorphisms and marker chromosomes or some structural rearrangements involving the centromere or acrocentric chromosomes. Our results suggested that there was no evidence for an association between chromosomal heteromorphisms and infertility or recurrent spontaneous abortions. Undoubtedly, sometimes we needed to combine the results of CMA or CNV-seq to comprehensively reflect the structure and aberration of chromosome segments. Thus, accurate karyotype reports and genetic counseling could be provided.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6751659
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67516592019-09-23 C-banding and AgNOR-staining were still effective complementary methods to indentify chromosomal heteromorphisms and some structural abnormalities in prenatal diagnosis Zhu, Jian Jiang Qi, Hong Cai, Li Rong Wen, Xiao Hui Zeng, Wen Tang, Guo Dong Luo, Yao Meng, Ran Mao, Xue Qun Zhang, Shao Qin Mol Cytogenet Research BACKGROUND: In prenatal diagnosis, CMA has begun to emerge as a favorable alternative to karyotype analysis, but it could not identify balanced translocations, triploidies, inversion and heteromorphisms. Therefore, conventional cytogenetic and specific staining methods still play an important role in the work-up of chromosome anomaly. This study investigated the application of C-banding and AgNOR-staining techniques in prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal heteromorphisms and some structure abnormalities. RESULTS: Among the 2970 samples, the incidence of chromosomal heteromorphisms was 8.79% (261/2970). The most frequent was found to be chromosome Y (2.93%, 87/2970), followed by chromosome 1 (1.65 %, 49/2970), 9 (1.52 %, 45/2970), 22 (0.77 %, 23/2970) and 15 (0.64 %, 19/2970). We compared the incidence of chromosomal heteromorphisms between recurrent spontaneous abortion (RSA) group and control group. The frequency of autosomal hetermorphisms in RSA group was 7.63% higher than that in control group (5.78%), while the frequency of Y chromosomal heteromorphisms was 4.76% lower than that in control group (5.71%). Here we summarized 4 representative cases, inv (1) (p12q24), psu dic (4;17) (p16.3;p13.3), r(X)(p11; q21) and an isodicentric bisatellited chromosome to illustrate the application of C-banding or AgNOR-staining, CMA or NGS was performed to detect CNVs if necessary. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicated that C-banding and AgNOR-staining were still effective complementary methods to identify chromosomal heteromorphisms and marker chromosomes or some structural rearrangements involving the centromere or acrocentric chromosomes. Our results suggested that there was no evidence for an association between chromosomal heteromorphisms and infertility or recurrent spontaneous abortions. Undoubtedly, sometimes we needed to combine the results of CMA or CNV-seq to comprehensively reflect the structure and aberration of chromosome segments. Thus, accurate karyotype reports and genetic counseling could be provided. BioMed Central 2019-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6751659/ /pubmed/31548869 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13039-019-0453-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Zhu, Jian Jiang
Qi, Hong
Cai, Li Rong
Wen, Xiao Hui
Zeng, Wen
Tang, Guo Dong
Luo, Yao
Meng, Ran
Mao, Xue Qun
Zhang, Shao Qin
C-banding and AgNOR-staining were still effective complementary methods to indentify chromosomal heteromorphisms and some structural abnormalities in prenatal diagnosis
title C-banding and AgNOR-staining were still effective complementary methods to indentify chromosomal heteromorphisms and some structural abnormalities in prenatal diagnosis
title_full C-banding and AgNOR-staining were still effective complementary methods to indentify chromosomal heteromorphisms and some structural abnormalities in prenatal diagnosis
title_fullStr C-banding and AgNOR-staining were still effective complementary methods to indentify chromosomal heteromorphisms and some structural abnormalities in prenatal diagnosis
title_full_unstemmed C-banding and AgNOR-staining were still effective complementary methods to indentify chromosomal heteromorphisms and some structural abnormalities in prenatal diagnosis
title_short C-banding and AgNOR-staining were still effective complementary methods to indentify chromosomal heteromorphisms and some structural abnormalities in prenatal diagnosis
title_sort c-banding and agnor-staining were still effective complementary methods to indentify chromosomal heteromorphisms and some structural abnormalities in prenatal diagnosis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6751659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31548869
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13039-019-0453-1
work_keys_str_mv AT zhujianjiang cbandingandagnorstainingwerestilleffectivecomplementarymethodstoindentifychromosomalheteromorphismsandsomestructuralabnormalitiesinprenataldiagnosis
AT qihong cbandingandagnorstainingwerestilleffectivecomplementarymethodstoindentifychromosomalheteromorphismsandsomestructuralabnormalitiesinprenataldiagnosis
AT cailirong cbandingandagnorstainingwerestilleffectivecomplementarymethodstoindentifychromosomalheteromorphismsandsomestructuralabnormalitiesinprenataldiagnosis
AT wenxiaohui cbandingandagnorstainingwerestilleffectivecomplementarymethodstoindentifychromosomalheteromorphismsandsomestructuralabnormalitiesinprenataldiagnosis
AT zengwen cbandingandagnorstainingwerestilleffectivecomplementarymethodstoindentifychromosomalheteromorphismsandsomestructuralabnormalitiesinprenataldiagnosis
AT tangguodong cbandingandagnorstainingwerestilleffectivecomplementarymethodstoindentifychromosomalheteromorphismsandsomestructuralabnormalitiesinprenataldiagnosis
AT luoyao cbandingandagnorstainingwerestilleffectivecomplementarymethodstoindentifychromosomalheteromorphismsandsomestructuralabnormalitiesinprenataldiagnosis
AT mengran cbandingandagnorstainingwerestilleffectivecomplementarymethodstoindentifychromosomalheteromorphismsandsomestructuralabnormalitiesinprenataldiagnosis
AT maoxuequn cbandingandagnorstainingwerestilleffectivecomplementarymethodstoindentifychromosomalheteromorphismsandsomestructuralabnormalitiesinprenataldiagnosis
AT zhangshaoqin cbandingandagnorstainingwerestilleffectivecomplementarymethodstoindentifychromosomalheteromorphismsandsomestructuralabnormalitiesinprenataldiagnosis