Cargando…

A review of current practice in the design and assessment of internal pilots in UK NIHR clinical trials

BACKGROUND: Internal pilots provide useful information which can help to optimise the running of the main trial. Although some recommendations exist in the literature for the design of internal pilots, little is known about current practice in terms of the specification and also the assessment of pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rosala-Hallas, Anna, Gamble, Carrol, Blazeby, Jane, Williamson, Paula R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6751663/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31533775
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3669-9
_version_ 1783452655480209408
author Rosala-Hallas, Anna
Gamble, Carrol
Blazeby, Jane
Williamson, Paula R.
author_facet Rosala-Hallas, Anna
Gamble, Carrol
Blazeby, Jane
Williamson, Paula R.
author_sort Rosala-Hallas, Anna
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Internal pilots provide useful information which can help to optimise the running of the main trial. Although some recommendations exist in the literature for the design of internal pilots, little is known about current practice in terms of the specification and also the assessment of progression criteria. The aim of the review is to provide an overview of current practice. METHODS: A cohort of clinical trials with an internal pilot, funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), Health Technology Assessment programme (HTA), extracted in 2017 was reviewed. Data were extracted from: project descriptions; summary of changes from the first stage; feedback about the full application; monitoring notes; progress report history and protocols, for information about the design and assessment of internal pilots. RESULTS: Fifty-seven studies were reviewed. An internal pilot was first proposed in the early stages of the trial in the majority of cases. Target number for recruitment, rate of randomisation, retention/primary outcome ascertainment rate, rate of treatment adherence and consent rate were included as progression criteria. All but one study was permitted to continue to the main trial; however, 25% did not strictly meet the progression criteria. Changes were made to the design of the main trial for 25% of studies, mainly in terms of conduct of recruitment. CONCLUSIONS: This review provides insight into the process of designing and assessing internal pilots. Progression criteria are sometimes not met; however, committees involved in the reviewing process will recommend continuation to the main trial, usually accompanied by a second review or close monitoring. Recommendations are made to optimise the process. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-019-3669-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6751663
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67516632019-09-23 A review of current practice in the design and assessment of internal pilots in UK NIHR clinical trials Rosala-Hallas, Anna Gamble, Carrol Blazeby, Jane Williamson, Paula R. Trials Methodology BACKGROUND: Internal pilots provide useful information which can help to optimise the running of the main trial. Although some recommendations exist in the literature for the design of internal pilots, little is known about current practice in terms of the specification and also the assessment of progression criteria. The aim of the review is to provide an overview of current practice. METHODS: A cohort of clinical trials with an internal pilot, funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), Health Technology Assessment programme (HTA), extracted in 2017 was reviewed. Data were extracted from: project descriptions; summary of changes from the first stage; feedback about the full application; monitoring notes; progress report history and protocols, for information about the design and assessment of internal pilots. RESULTS: Fifty-seven studies were reviewed. An internal pilot was first proposed in the early stages of the trial in the majority of cases. Target number for recruitment, rate of randomisation, retention/primary outcome ascertainment rate, rate of treatment adherence and consent rate were included as progression criteria. All but one study was permitted to continue to the main trial; however, 25% did not strictly meet the progression criteria. Changes were made to the design of the main trial for 25% of studies, mainly in terms of conduct of recruitment. CONCLUSIONS: This review provides insight into the process of designing and assessing internal pilots. Progression criteria are sometimes not met; however, committees involved in the reviewing process will recommend continuation to the main trial, usually accompanied by a second review or close monitoring. Recommendations are made to optimise the process. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-019-3669-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6751663/ /pubmed/31533775 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3669-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Methodology
Rosala-Hallas, Anna
Gamble, Carrol
Blazeby, Jane
Williamson, Paula R.
A review of current practice in the design and assessment of internal pilots in UK NIHR clinical trials
title A review of current practice in the design and assessment of internal pilots in UK NIHR clinical trials
title_full A review of current practice in the design and assessment of internal pilots in UK NIHR clinical trials
title_fullStr A review of current practice in the design and assessment of internal pilots in UK NIHR clinical trials
title_full_unstemmed A review of current practice in the design and assessment of internal pilots in UK NIHR clinical trials
title_short A review of current practice in the design and assessment of internal pilots in UK NIHR clinical trials
title_sort review of current practice in the design and assessment of internal pilots in uk nihr clinical trials
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6751663/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31533775
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3669-9
work_keys_str_mv AT rosalahallasanna areviewofcurrentpracticeinthedesignandassessmentofinternalpilotsinuknihrclinicaltrials
AT gamblecarrol areviewofcurrentpracticeinthedesignandassessmentofinternalpilotsinuknihrclinicaltrials
AT blazebyjane areviewofcurrentpracticeinthedesignandassessmentofinternalpilotsinuknihrclinicaltrials
AT williamsonpaular areviewofcurrentpracticeinthedesignandassessmentofinternalpilotsinuknihrclinicaltrials
AT rosalahallasanna reviewofcurrentpracticeinthedesignandassessmentofinternalpilotsinuknihrclinicaltrials
AT gamblecarrol reviewofcurrentpracticeinthedesignandassessmentofinternalpilotsinuknihrclinicaltrials
AT blazebyjane reviewofcurrentpracticeinthedesignandassessmentofinternalpilotsinuknihrclinicaltrials
AT williamsonpaular reviewofcurrentpracticeinthedesignandassessmentofinternalpilotsinuknihrclinicaltrials