Cargando…

A randomized controlled trial comparing early versus late oral feeding after cesarean section under regional anesthesia

OBJECTIVE: To compare the return of bowel movements in regionally anesthetized women undergoing cesarean section (C-section) given Early Oral Feeding (EOF) to that of women given Late Oral Feeding (LOF). Secondary outcomes of maternal satisfaction and gastrointestinal complications were also examine...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mawson, Apinun Luksanachinda, Bumrungphuet, Sommart, Manonai, Jittima
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6751764/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31686920
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S222922
_version_ 1783452678779568128
author Mawson, Apinun Luksanachinda
Bumrungphuet, Sommart
Manonai, Jittima
author_facet Mawson, Apinun Luksanachinda
Bumrungphuet, Sommart
Manonai, Jittima
author_sort Mawson, Apinun Luksanachinda
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare the return of bowel movements in regionally anesthetized women undergoing cesarean section (C-section) given Early Oral Feeding (EOF) to that of women given Late Oral Feeding (LOF). Secondary outcomes of maternal satisfaction and gastrointestinal complications were also examined. METHODS: In a single-blinded randomized controlled trial (TCTR20181202001), 148 singleton pregnant women undergoing elective C-sections with regional anesthesia were assigned to receive either EOF or LOF. Participants began to sip water at 6–8 hrs or more than 12 hrs post-operation, for EOF or LOF respectively. Participants were then placed onto a stepping diet as tolerated. Participants failing to tolerate the stepping diet or those having surgical complications were excluded from the study. RESULTS: After exclusion, 69 women remained in the EOF group and 67 in the LOF group. The ages of participants ranged from 19 to 42, with a mean of 32.07. There was no-loss follow up and no significant difference in patient characteristics, except the site of the surgical incision. Participants given EOF were more likely to experience bowel sound the next morning than patients given LOF (EOF 87.0%, LOF 44.8%, P-value<0.001). However, there was no difference in time to passing flatus and time to passing stool. Maternal satisfaction regarding hunger (EOF 3.78±0.91, LOF 3.24±1.01, P-value 0.002) and maternal satisfaction with postoperative consumption (EOF 4.38±0.64, LOF 4.13±0.48, P-value 0.049) were significantly higher in the EOF group. There was no difference in gastrointestinal complications between the groups (P-value 0.978). CONCLUSION: The EOF group experienced an earlier return of bowel movement and greater maternal satisfaction than the LOF group, with no difference in gastrointestinal complications. These findings support the recommendation of EOF for women who undergo uncomplicated C-sections under regional anesthesia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6751764
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67517642019-11-04 A randomized controlled trial comparing early versus late oral feeding after cesarean section under regional anesthesia Mawson, Apinun Luksanachinda Bumrungphuet, Sommart Manonai, Jittima Int J Womens Health Clinical Trial Report OBJECTIVE: To compare the return of bowel movements in regionally anesthetized women undergoing cesarean section (C-section) given Early Oral Feeding (EOF) to that of women given Late Oral Feeding (LOF). Secondary outcomes of maternal satisfaction and gastrointestinal complications were also examined. METHODS: In a single-blinded randomized controlled trial (TCTR20181202001), 148 singleton pregnant women undergoing elective C-sections with regional anesthesia were assigned to receive either EOF or LOF. Participants began to sip water at 6–8 hrs or more than 12 hrs post-operation, for EOF or LOF respectively. Participants were then placed onto a stepping diet as tolerated. Participants failing to tolerate the stepping diet or those having surgical complications were excluded from the study. RESULTS: After exclusion, 69 women remained in the EOF group and 67 in the LOF group. The ages of participants ranged from 19 to 42, with a mean of 32.07. There was no-loss follow up and no significant difference in patient characteristics, except the site of the surgical incision. Participants given EOF were more likely to experience bowel sound the next morning than patients given LOF (EOF 87.0%, LOF 44.8%, P-value<0.001). However, there was no difference in time to passing flatus and time to passing stool. Maternal satisfaction regarding hunger (EOF 3.78±0.91, LOF 3.24±1.01, P-value 0.002) and maternal satisfaction with postoperative consumption (EOF 4.38±0.64, LOF 4.13±0.48, P-value 0.049) were significantly higher in the EOF group. There was no difference in gastrointestinal complications between the groups (P-value 0.978). CONCLUSION: The EOF group experienced an earlier return of bowel movement and greater maternal satisfaction than the LOF group, with no difference in gastrointestinal complications. These findings support the recommendation of EOF for women who undergo uncomplicated C-sections under regional anesthesia. Dove 2019-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6751764/ /pubmed/31686920 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S222922 Text en © 2019 Mawson et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Clinical Trial Report
Mawson, Apinun Luksanachinda
Bumrungphuet, Sommart
Manonai, Jittima
A randomized controlled trial comparing early versus late oral feeding after cesarean section under regional anesthesia
title A randomized controlled trial comparing early versus late oral feeding after cesarean section under regional anesthesia
title_full A randomized controlled trial comparing early versus late oral feeding after cesarean section under regional anesthesia
title_fullStr A randomized controlled trial comparing early versus late oral feeding after cesarean section under regional anesthesia
title_full_unstemmed A randomized controlled trial comparing early versus late oral feeding after cesarean section under regional anesthesia
title_short A randomized controlled trial comparing early versus late oral feeding after cesarean section under regional anesthesia
title_sort randomized controlled trial comparing early versus late oral feeding after cesarean section under regional anesthesia
topic Clinical Trial Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6751764/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31686920
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S222922
work_keys_str_mv AT mawsonapinunluksanachinda arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingearlyversuslateoralfeedingaftercesareansectionunderregionalanesthesia
AT bumrungphuetsommart arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingearlyversuslateoralfeedingaftercesareansectionunderregionalanesthesia
AT manonaijittima arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingearlyversuslateoralfeedingaftercesareansectionunderregionalanesthesia
AT mawsonapinunluksanachinda randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingearlyversuslateoralfeedingaftercesareansectionunderregionalanesthesia
AT bumrungphuetsommart randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingearlyversuslateoralfeedingaftercesareansectionunderregionalanesthesia
AT manonaijittima randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingearlyversuslateoralfeedingaftercesareansectionunderregionalanesthesia