Cargando…

Screening HIV-positive men who have sex with men for hepatitis C re-infection risk: is a single question on condom-use enough? A sensitivity analysis

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is common in men who have sex with men (MSM) with HIV. The Swiss HCVree Trial targeted a micro-elimination by using a treat and counsel strategy. Self-reported condomless anal intercourse with non-steady partners was used as the selection criterion for participati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Künzler-Heule, Patrizia, Engberg, Sandra, Battegay, Manuel, Schmidt, Axel J., Fierz, Katharina, Nguyen, Huyen, Kocher, Agnes, Nöstlinger, Christiana, Hampel, Benjamin, Stöckle, Marcel, Béguelin, Charles, Delaloye, Julie, Schmid, Patrick, Flepp, Markus, Rougement, Mathieu, Braun, Dominique Laurent, Fehr, Jan, Nicca, Dunja
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6751884/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31533734
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-019-4456-7
_version_ 1783452705824440320
author Künzler-Heule, Patrizia
Engberg, Sandra
Battegay, Manuel
Schmidt, Axel J.
Fierz, Katharina
Nguyen, Huyen
Kocher, Agnes
Nöstlinger, Christiana
Hampel, Benjamin
Stöckle, Marcel
Béguelin, Charles
Delaloye, Julie
Schmid, Patrick
Flepp, Markus
Rougement, Mathieu
Braun, Dominique Laurent
Fehr, Jan
Nicca, Dunja
author_facet Künzler-Heule, Patrizia
Engberg, Sandra
Battegay, Manuel
Schmidt, Axel J.
Fierz, Katharina
Nguyen, Huyen
Kocher, Agnes
Nöstlinger, Christiana
Hampel, Benjamin
Stöckle, Marcel
Béguelin, Charles
Delaloye, Julie
Schmid, Patrick
Flepp, Markus
Rougement, Mathieu
Braun, Dominique Laurent
Fehr, Jan
Nicca, Dunja
author_sort Künzler-Heule, Patrizia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is common in men who have sex with men (MSM) with HIV. The Swiss HCVree Trial targeted a micro-elimination by using a treat and counsel strategy. Self-reported condomless anal intercourse with non-steady partners was used as the selection criterion for participation in a counselling intervention designed to prevent HCV re-infection. The purpose of this study was to assess the ability of this criterion to identify men who engaged in other sexual risk behaviours associated with HCV re-infection. METHODS: Men who disclosed their sexual and drug- use behaviours during the prior 6 months, at study baseline, were included in the current study. Using a descriptive comparative study design, we explored self-reported sexual and drug-use risk behaviours, compared the odds of reporting each behaviour in men who reported and denied condomless anal intercourse with non-steady partners during the prior year and calculated the sensitivity/specificity (95% CI) of the screening question in relation to the other at-risk behaviours. RESULTS: Seventy-two (61%) of the 118 men meeting eligibity criteria reported condomless anal intercourse with non-steady partners during the prior year. Many also engaged in other potential HCV transmission risk behaviours, e.g., 52 (44%) had used drugs. In participants disclosing drug use, 44 (37%) reported sexualised drug use and 17 (14%) injected drugs. Unadjusted odds ratios (95% CI) for two well-known risk behaviours were 2.02 (0.80, 5.62) for fisting and 5.66 (1.49, 37.12) for injecting drug use. The odds ratio for sexualised drug use - a potential mediator for increased sexual risk taking - was 5.90 (2.44, 16.05). Condomless anal intercourse with non-steady partners showed varying sensitivity in relation to the other risk behaviours examined (66.7–88.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Although condomless anal intercourse with non-steady partners was fairly sensitive in detecting other HCV relevant risk behaviours, using it as the only screening criterion could lead to missing a proportion of HIV-positive men at risk for HCV re-infection due to other behaviours. This work also points to the importance of providing access to behavioral interventions addressing other sexual and drug use practices as part of HCV treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trial Number: NCT02785666, 30.05.2016.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6751884
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67518842019-09-23 Screening HIV-positive men who have sex with men for hepatitis C re-infection risk: is a single question on condom-use enough? A sensitivity analysis Künzler-Heule, Patrizia Engberg, Sandra Battegay, Manuel Schmidt, Axel J. Fierz, Katharina Nguyen, Huyen Kocher, Agnes Nöstlinger, Christiana Hampel, Benjamin Stöckle, Marcel Béguelin, Charles Delaloye, Julie Schmid, Patrick Flepp, Markus Rougement, Mathieu Braun, Dominique Laurent Fehr, Jan Nicca, Dunja BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is common in men who have sex with men (MSM) with HIV. The Swiss HCVree Trial targeted a micro-elimination by using a treat and counsel strategy. Self-reported condomless anal intercourse with non-steady partners was used as the selection criterion for participation in a counselling intervention designed to prevent HCV re-infection. The purpose of this study was to assess the ability of this criterion to identify men who engaged in other sexual risk behaviours associated with HCV re-infection. METHODS: Men who disclosed their sexual and drug- use behaviours during the prior 6 months, at study baseline, were included in the current study. Using a descriptive comparative study design, we explored self-reported sexual and drug-use risk behaviours, compared the odds of reporting each behaviour in men who reported and denied condomless anal intercourse with non-steady partners during the prior year and calculated the sensitivity/specificity (95% CI) of the screening question in relation to the other at-risk behaviours. RESULTS: Seventy-two (61%) of the 118 men meeting eligibity criteria reported condomless anal intercourse with non-steady partners during the prior year. Many also engaged in other potential HCV transmission risk behaviours, e.g., 52 (44%) had used drugs. In participants disclosing drug use, 44 (37%) reported sexualised drug use and 17 (14%) injected drugs. Unadjusted odds ratios (95% CI) for two well-known risk behaviours were 2.02 (0.80, 5.62) for fisting and 5.66 (1.49, 37.12) for injecting drug use. The odds ratio for sexualised drug use - a potential mediator for increased sexual risk taking - was 5.90 (2.44, 16.05). Condomless anal intercourse with non-steady partners showed varying sensitivity in relation to the other risk behaviours examined (66.7–88.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Although condomless anal intercourse with non-steady partners was fairly sensitive in detecting other HCV relevant risk behaviours, using it as the only screening criterion could lead to missing a proportion of HIV-positive men at risk for HCV re-infection due to other behaviours. This work also points to the importance of providing access to behavioral interventions addressing other sexual and drug use practices as part of HCV treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trial Number: NCT02785666, 30.05.2016. BioMed Central 2019-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6751884/ /pubmed/31533734 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-019-4456-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Künzler-Heule, Patrizia
Engberg, Sandra
Battegay, Manuel
Schmidt, Axel J.
Fierz, Katharina
Nguyen, Huyen
Kocher, Agnes
Nöstlinger, Christiana
Hampel, Benjamin
Stöckle, Marcel
Béguelin, Charles
Delaloye, Julie
Schmid, Patrick
Flepp, Markus
Rougement, Mathieu
Braun, Dominique Laurent
Fehr, Jan
Nicca, Dunja
Screening HIV-positive men who have sex with men for hepatitis C re-infection risk: is a single question on condom-use enough? A sensitivity analysis
title Screening HIV-positive men who have sex with men for hepatitis C re-infection risk: is a single question on condom-use enough? A sensitivity analysis
title_full Screening HIV-positive men who have sex with men for hepatitis C re-infection risk: is a single question on condom-use enough? A sensitivity analysis
title_fullStr Screening HIV-positive men who have sex with men for hepatitis C re-infection risk: is a single question on condom-use enough? A sensitivity analysis
title_full_unstemmed Screening HIV-positive men who have sex with men for hepatitis C re-infection risk: is a single question on condom-use enough? A sensitivity analysis
title_short Screening HIV-positive men who have sex with men for hepatitis C re-infection risk: is a single question on condom-use enough? A sensitivity analysis
title_sort screening hiv-positive men who have sex with men for hepatitis c re-infection risk: is a single question on condom-use enough? a sensitivity analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6751884/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31533734
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-019-4456-7
work_keys_str_mv AT kunzlerheulepatrizia screeninghivpositivemenwhohavesexwithmenforhepatitiscreinfectionriskisasinglequestiononcondomuseenoughasensitivityanalysis
AT engbergsandra screeninghivpositivemenwhohavesexwithmenforhepatitiscreinfectionriskisasinglequestiononcondomuseenoughasensitivityanalysis
AT battegaymanuel screeninghivpositivemenwhohavesexwithmenforhepatitiscreinfectionriskisasinglequestiononcondomuseenoughasensitivityanalysis
AT schmidtaxelj screeninghivpositivemenwhohavesexwithmenforhepatitiscreinfectionriskisasinglequestiononcondomuseenoughasensitivityanalysis
AT fierzkatharina screeninghivpositivemenwhohavesexwithmenforhepatitiscreinfectionriskisasinglequestiononcondomuseenoughasensitivityanalysis
AT nguyenhuyen screeninghivpositivemenwhohavesexwithmenforhepatitiscreinfectionriskisasinglequestiononcondomuseenoughasensitivityanalysis
AT kocheragnes screeninghivpositivemenwhohavesexwithmenforhepatitiscreinfectionriskisasinglequestiononcondomuseenoughasensitivityanalysis
AT nostlingerchristiana screeninghivpositivemenwhohavesexwithmenforhepatitiscreinfectionriskisasinglequestiononcondomuseenoughasensitivityanalysis
AT hampelbenjamin screeninghivpositivemenwhohavesexwithmenforhepatitiscreinfectionriskisasinglequestiononcondomuseenoughasensitivityanalysis
AT stocklemarcel screeninghivpositivemenwhohavesexwithmenforhepatitiscreinfectionriskisasinglequestiononcondomuseenoughasensitivityanalysis
AT beguelincharles screeninghivpositivemenwhohavesexwithmenforhepatitiscreinfectionriskisasinglequestiononcondomuseenoughasensitivityanalysis
AT delaloyejulie screeninghivpositivemenwhohavesexwithmenforhepatitiscreinfectionriskisasinglequestiononcondomuseenoughasensitivityanalysis
AT schmidpatrick screeninghivpositivemenwhohavesexwithmenforhepatitiscreinfectionriskisasinglequestiononcondomuseenoughasensitivityanalysis
AT fleppmarkus screeninghivpositivemenwhohavesexwithmenforhepatitiscreinfectionriskisasinglequestiononcondomuseenoughasensitivityanalysis
AT rougementmathieu screeninghivpositivemenwhohavesexwithmenforhepatitiscreinfectionriskisasinglequestiononcondomuseenoughasensitivityanalysis
AT braundominiquelaurent screeninghivpositivemenwhohavesexwithmenforhepatitiscreinfectionriskisasinglequestiononcondomuseenoughasensitivityanalysis
AT fehrjan screeninghivpositivemenwhohavesexwithmenforhepatitiscreinfectionriskisasinglequestiononcondomuseenoughasensitivityanalysis
AT niccadunja screeninghivpositivemenwhohavesexwithmenforhepatitiscreinfectionriskisasinglequestiononcondomuseenoughasensitivityanalysis
AT screeninghivpositivemenwhohavesexwithmenforhepatitiscreinfectionriskisasinglequestiononcondomuseenoughasensitivityanalysis