Cargando…

Differences between the effects of conventional cigarettes, e-cigarettes and dual product use on urine cotinine levels

INTRODUCTION: The goal of this study was to evaluate the differences in urine cotinine (UC) concentration based on the use of conventional cigarettes, e-cigarettes (ECs), and dual product use, and determine the use of ECs in the real world. METHODS: In total, 15099 subjects were classified into non-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, Myung-Bae, Choi, Jung-Kyu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: European Publishing on behalf of the International Society for the Prevention of Tobacco Induced Diseases (ISPTID) 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6751982/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31582923
http://dx.doi.org/10.18332/tid/100527
_version_ 1783452715964170240
author Park, Myung-Bae
Choi, Jung-Kyu
author_facet Park, Myung-Bae
Choi, Jung-Kyu
author_sort Park, Myung-Bae
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The goal of this study was to evaluate the differences in urine cotinine (UC) concentration based on the use of conventional cigarettes, e-cigarettes (ECs), and dual product use, and determine the use of ECs in the real world. METHODS: In total, 15099 subjects were classified into non-smokers, cigarette smokers (c-smokers), e-cigarette smokers (e-smokers), and dual users, and their UC (a classical biomarker of smoking) values were compared. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was performed after adjusting for age, sex and job status to analyze the differences in UC concentration in relation to type of smoking. The reasons for using ECs and the experience of cigarette use before using ECs were analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 15099 people, 76.4% were non-smokers, 20.9% c-smokers, 2.3% dual users, and 0.4% were e-smokers. There were significant differences in UC concentration among the groups (p<0.001). The geometric mean (GM) UC concentration was 4.45 ng/mL. UC concentration was the highest among dual users (GM: 1030.5, median: 1258.9 ng/mL), followed by c-smokers (GM: 842.5, median: 1163.0 ng/mL), e-smokers (GM: 119.5, median: 309.7 ng/mL), and non-smokers (GM: 0.8, median: 0.8 ng/mL). Among the EC users, the rate of using ECs for health or social convenience was 81.9%. Among e-smokers, 11.4% had never smoked previously. CONCLUSIONS: The UC concentration was the highest among dual users. However, for the female population, the UC concentration was the highest among e-smokers. The vast majority of EC users were dual users. In addition, there were no differences in the frequency of cigarette smoking between the dual user and c-smoker groups. Consequently, EC use did not lead to a decrease in cigarette use, but did lead to an increase in UC concentration. Therefore, in the real world, dual users have higher cotinine levels than the other groups, which could indicate that they take more nicotine by cigarettes or ECs, or are more addicted than others.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6751982
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher European Publishing on behalf of the International Society for the Prevention of Tobacco Induced Diseases (ISPTID)
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67519822019-10-03 Differences between the effects of conventional cigarettes, e-cigarettes and dual product use on urine cotinine levels Park, Myung-Bae Choi, Jung-Kyu Tob Induc Dis Research Paper INTRODUCTION: The goal of this study was to evaluate the differences in urine cotinine (UC) concentration based on the use of conventional cigarettes, e-cigarettes (ECs), and dual product use, and determine the use of ECs in the real world. METHODS: In total, 15099 subjects were classified into non-smokers, cigarette smokers (c-smokers), e-cigarette smokers (e-smokers), and dual users, and their UC (a classical biomarker of smoking) values were compared. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was performed after adjusting for age, sex and job status to analyze the differences in UC concentration in relation to type of smoking. The reasons for using ECs and the experience of cigarette use before using ECs were analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 15099 people, 76.4% were non-smokers, 20.9% c-smokers, 2.3% dual users, and 0.4% were e-smokers. There were significant differences in UC concentration among the groups (p<0.001). The geometric mean (GM) UC concentration was 4.45 ng/mL. UC concentration was the highest among dual users (GM: 1030.5, median: 1258.9 ng/mL), followed by c-smokers (GM: 842.5, median: 1163.0 ng/mL), e-smokers (GM: 119.5, median: 309.7 ng/mL), and non-smokers (GM: 0.8, median: 0.8 ng/mL). Among the EC users, the rate of using ECs for health or social convenience was 81.9%. Among e-smokers, 11.4% had never smoked previously. CONCLUSIONS: The UC concentration was the highest among dual users. However, for the female population, the UC concentration was the highest among e-smokers. The vast majority of EC users were dual users. In addition, there were no differences in the frequency of cigarette smoking between the dual user and c-smoker groups. Consequently, EC use did not lead to a decrease in cigarette use, but did lead to an increase in UC concentration. Therefore, in the real world, dual users have higher cotinine levels than the other groups, which could indicate that they take more nicotine by cigarettes or ECs, or are more addicted than others. European Publishing on behalf of the International Society for the Prevention of Tobacco Induced Diseases (ISPTID) 2019-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6751982/ /pubmed/31582923 http://dx.doi.org/10.18332/tid/100527 Text en © 2019 Park M. B https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Park, Myung-Bae
Choi, Jung-Kyu
Differences between the effects of conventional cigarettes, e-cigarettes and dual product use on urine cotinine levels
title Differences between the effects of conventional cigarettes, e-cigarettes and dual product use on urine cotinine levels
title_full Differences between the effects of conventional cigarettes, e-cigarettes and dual product use on urine cotinine levels
title_fullStr Differences between the effects of conventional cigarettes, e-cigarettes and dual product use on urine cotinine levels
title_full_unstemmed Differences between the effects of conventional cigarettes, e-cigarettes and dual product use on urine cotinine levels
title_short Differences between the effects of conventional cigarettes, e-cigarettes and dual product use on urine cotinine levels
title_sort differences between the effects of conventional cigarettes, e-cigarettes and dual product use on urine cotinine levels
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6751982/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31582923
http://dx.doi.org/10.18332/tid/100527
work_keys_str_mv AT parkmyungbae differencesbetweentheeffectsofconventionalcigarettesecigarettesanddualproductuseonurinecotininelevels
AT choijungkyu differencesbetweentheeffectsofconventionalcigarettesecigarettesanddualproductuseonurinecotininelevels