Cargando…
Secondary analysis of an RCT on Emergency Department-Initiated Tobacco Control: Repeatedly assessed point-prevalence abstinence up to 12 months and extension of results through a 10-year follow-up
INTRODUCTION: Emergency departments (EDs) are opportune places for tobacco control interventions. The ‘Tobacco Control in an Urban Emergency Department’ (TED) study, ISRCTN41527831, originally evaluated the effect of motivational interviewing on-site plus up to four booster telephone calls on 12-mon...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
European Publishing on behalf of the International Society for the Prevention of Tobacco Induced Diseases (ISPTID)
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6751984/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31582937 http://dx.doi.org/10.18332/tid/105579 |
_version_ | 1783452716428689408 |
---|---|
author | Weiss-Gerlach, Edith McCarthy, William J. Wellmann, Jürgen Graunke, Marie Spies, Claudia Neuner, Bruno |
author_facet | Weiss-Gerlach, Edith McCarthy, William J. Wellmann, Jürgen Graunke, Marie Spies, Claudia Neuner, Bruno |
author_sort | Weiss-Gerlach, Edith |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Emergency departments (EDs) are opportune places for tobacco control interventions. The ‘Tobacco Control in an Urban Emergency Department’ (TED) study, ISRCTN41527831, originally evaluated the effect of motivational interviewing on-site plus up to four booster telephone calls on 12-month abstinence. This study’s aim was to evaluate the effect of the intervention on 7-day point-prevalence abstinence at 10 years follow-up (primary outcome) as well as on repeated point-prevalence abstinence at 1, 3, 6, 12 months and at 10 years (continual smoking abstinence, secondary outcome). METHODS: At the 10 years follow-up and after informed consent, study participants responded to a mailed questionnaire. The primary outcome was analyzed in observed-only and in all-cases analyses. The secondary outcomes were analyzed using a multiple adjusted GLMM for binary outcomes. RESULTS: Out of 1012 TED-study participants, 986 (97.4%) were alive and 231 (23.4% of 986) responded to the follow-up at 10 years. For observed-only and all-cases analyses, the effect of the baseline intervention on 7-day point-prevalence abstinence at the 10 years follow-up was statistically non-significant. However, when taking into account all repeated measures, the intervention significantly influenced continual abstinence with odds ratio 1.32 (95% CI: 1.01–1.73; p=0.042). Baseline motivation, perceived self-efficacy to stop smoking, and nicotine dependency were independently associated with long-term continual smoking abstinence (all p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A conventional analysis failed to confirm a significant effect of the ED-initiated tobacco control intervention on the point-prevalence abstinence at 10 years. Results from a more integrative analysis nonetheless indicated an enduring intervention effect on continual abstinence among smokers first encountered in the emergency department setting 10 years earlier. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6751984 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | European Publishing on behalf of the International Society for the Prevention of Tobacco Induced Diseases (ISPTID) |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67519842019-10-03 Secondary analysis of an RCT on Emergency Department-Initiated Tobacco Control: Repeatedly assessed point-prevalence abstinence up to 12 months and extension of results through a 10-year follow-up Weiss-Gerlach, Edith McCarthy, William J. Wellmann, Jürgen Graunke, Marie Spies, Claudia Neuner, Bruno Tob Induc Dis Research Paper INTRODUCTION: Emergency departments (EDs) are opportune places for tobacco control interventions. The ‘Tobacco Control in an Urban Emergency Department’ (TED) study, ISRCTN41527831, originally evaluated the effect of motivational interviewing on-site plus up to four booster telephone calls on 12-month abstinence. This study’s aim was to evaluate the effect of the intervention on 7-day point-prevalence abstinence at 10 years follow-up (primary outcome) as well as on repeated point-prevalence abstinence at 1, 3, 6, 12 months and at 10 years (continual smoking abstinence, secondary outcome). METHODS: At the 10 years follow-up and after informed consent, study participants responded to a mailed questionnaire. The primary outcome was analyzed in observed-only and in all-cases analyses. The secondary outcomes were analyzed using a multiple adjusted GLMM for binary outcomes. RESULTS: Out of 1012 TED-study participants, 986 (97.4%) were alive and 231 (23.4% of 986) responded to the follow-up at 10 years. For observed-only and all-cases analyses, the effect of the baseline intervention on 7-day point-prevalence abstinence at the 10 years follow-up was statistically non-significant. However, when taking into account all repeated measures, the intervention significantly influenced continual abstinence with odds ratio 1.32 (95% CI: 1.01–1.73; p=0.042). Baseline motivation, perceived self-efficacy to stop smoking, and nicotine dependency were independently associated with long-term continual smoking abstinence (all p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A conventional analysis failed to confirm a significant effect of the ED-initiated tobacco control intervention on the point-prevalence abstinence at 10 years. Results from a more integrative analysis nonetheless indicated an enduring intervention effect on continual abstinence among smokers first encountered in the emergency department setting 10 years earlier. European Publishing on behalf of the International Society for the Prevention of Tobacco Induced Diseases (ISPTID) 2019-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6751984/ /pubmed/31582937 http://dx.doi.org/10.18332/tid/105579 Text en © 2019 Weiss-Gerlach E https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Weiss-Gerlach, Edith McCarthy, William J. Wellmann, Jürgen Graunke, Marie Spies, Claudia Neuner, Bruno Secondary analysis of an RCT on Emergency Department-Initiated Tobacco Control: Repeatedly assessed point-prevalence abstinence up to 12 months and extension of results through a 10-year follow-up |
title | Secondary analysis of an RCT on Emergency Department-Initiated Tobacco Control: Repeatedly assessed point-prevalence abstinence up to 12 months and extension of results through a 10-year follow-up |
title_full | Secondary analysis of an RCT on Emergency Department-Initiated Tobacco Control: Repeatedly assessed point-prevalence abstinence up to 12 months and extension of results through a 10-year follow-up |
title_fullStr | Secondary analysis of an RCT on Emergency Department-Initiated Tobacco Control: Repeatedly assessed point-prevalence abstinence up to 12 months and extension of results through a 10-year follow-up |
title_full_unstemmed | Secondary analysis of an RCT on Emergency Department-Initiated Tobacco Control: Repeatedly assessed point-prevalence abstinence up to 12 months and extension of results through a 10-year follow-up |
title_short | Secondary analysis of an RCT on Emergency Department-Initiated Tobacco Control: Repeatedly assessed point-prevalence abstinence up to 12 months and extension of results through a 10-year follow-up |
title_sort | secondary analysis of an rct on emergency department-initiated tobacco control: repeatedly assessed point-prevalence abstinence up to 12 months and extension of results through a 10-year follow-up |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6751984/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31582937 http://dx.doi.org/10.18332/tid/105579 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT weissgerlachedith secondaryanalysisofanrctonemergencydepartmentinitiatedtobaccocontrolrepeatedlyassessedpointprevalenceabstinenceupto12monthsandextensionofresultsthrougha10yearfollowup AT mccarthywilliamj secondaryanalysisofanrctonemergencydepartmentinitiatedtobaccocontrolrepeatedlyassessedpointprevalenceabstinenceupto12monthsandextensionofresultsthrougha10yearfollowup AT wellmannjurgen secondaryanalysisofanrctonemergencydepartmentinitiatedtobaccocontrolrepeatedlyassessedpointprevalenceabstinenceupto12monthsandextensionofresultsthrougha10yearfollowup AT graunkemarie secondaryanalysisofanrctonemergencydepartmentinitiatedtobaccocontrolrepeatedlyassessedpointprevalenceabstinenceupto12monthsandextensionofresultsthrougha10yearfollowup AT spiesclaudia secondaryanalysisofanrctonemergencydepartmentinitiatedtobaccocontrolrepeatedlyassessedpointprevalenceabstinenceupto12monthsandextensionofresultsthrougha10yearfollowup AT neunerbruno secondaryanalysisofanrctonemergencydepartmentinitiatedtobaccocontrolrepeatedlyassessedpointprevalenceabstinenceupto12monthsandextensionofresultsthrougha10yearfollowup |