Cargando…

Secondary analysis of an RCT on Emergency Department-Initiated Tobacco Control: Repeatedly assessed point-prevalence abstinence up to 12 months and extension of results through a 10-year follow-up

INTRODUCTION: Emergency departments (EDs) are opportune places for tobacco control interventions. The ‘Tobacco Control in an Urban Emergency Department’ (TED) study, ISRCTN41527831, originally evaluated the effect of motivational interviewing on-site plus up to four booster telephone calls on 12-mon...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weiss-Gerlach, Edith, McCarthy, William J., Wellmann, Jürgen, Graunke, Marie, Spies, Claudia, Neuner, Bruno
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: European Publishing on behalf of the International Society for the Prevention of Tobacco Induced Diseases (ISPTID) 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6751984/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31582937
http://dx.doi.org/10.18332/tid/105579
_version_ 1783452716428689408
author Weiss-Gerlach, Edith
McCarthy, William J.
Wellmann, Jürgen
Graunke, Marie
Spies, Claudia
Neuner, Bruno
author_facet Weiss-Gerlach, Edith
McCarthy, William J.
Wellmann, Jürgen
Graunke, Marie
Spies, Claudia
Neuner, Bruno
author_sort Weiss-Gerlach, Edith
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Emergency departments (EDs) are opportune places for tobacco control interventions. The ‘Tobacco Control in an Urban Emergency Department’ (TED) study, ISRCTN41527831, originally evaluated the effect of motivational interviewing on-site plus up to four booster telephone calls on 12-month abstinence. This study’s aim was to evaluate the effect of the intervention on 7-day point-prevalence abstinence at 10 years follow-up (primary outcome) as well as on repeated point-prevalence abstinence at 1, 3, 6, 12 months and at 10 years (continual smoking abstinence, secondary outcome). METHODS: At the 10 years follow-up and after informed consent, study participants responded to a mailed questionnaire. The primary outcome was analyzed in observed-only and in all-cases analyses. The secondary outcomes were analyzed using a multiple adjusted GLMM for binary outcomes. RESULTS: Out of 1012 TED-study participants, 986 (97.4%) were alive and 231 (23.4% of 986) responded to the follow-up at 10 years. For observed-only and all-cases analyses, the effect of the baseline intervention on 7-day point-prevalence abstinence at the 10 years follow-up was statistically non-significant. However, when taking into account all repeated measures, the intervention significantly influenced continual abstinence with odds ratio 1.32 (95% CI: 1.01–1.73; p=0.042). Baseline motivation, perceived self-efficacy to stop smoking, and nicotine dependency were independently associated with long-term continual smoking abstinence (all p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A conventional analysis failed to confirm a significant effect of the ED-initiated tobacco control intervention on the point-prevalence abstinence at 10 years. Results from a more integrative analysis nonetheless indicated an enduring intervention effect on continual abstinence among smokers first encountered in the emergency department setting 10 years earlier.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6751984
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher European Publishing on behalf of the International Society for the Prevention of Tobacco Induced Diseases (ISPTID)
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67519842019-10-03 Secondary analysis of an RCT on Emergency Department-Initiated Tobacco Control: Repeatedly assessed point-prevalence abstinence up to 12 months and extension of results through a 10-year follow-up Weiss-Gerlach, Edith McCarthy, William J. Wellmann, Jürgen Graunke, Marie Spies, Claudia Neuner, Bruno Tob Induc Dis Research Paper INTRODUCTION: Emergency departments (EDs) are opportune places for tobacco control interventions. The ‘Tobacco Control in an Urban Emergency Department’ (TED) study, ISRCTN41527831, originally evaluated the effect of motivational interviewing on-site plus up to four booster telephone calls on 12-month abstinence. This study’s aim was to evaluate the effect of the intervention on 7-day point-prevalence abstinence at 10 years follow-up (primary outcome) as well as on repeated point-prevalence abstinence at 1, 3, 6, 12 months and at 10 years (continual smoking abstinence, secondary outcome). METHODS: At the 10 years follow-up and after informed consent, study participants responded to a mailed questionnaire. The primary outcome was analyzed in observed-only and in all-cases analyses. The secondary outcomes were analyzed using a multiple adjusted GLMM for binary outcomes. RESULTS: Out of 1012 TED-study participants, 986 (97.4%) were alive and 231 (23.4% of 986) responded to the follow-up at 10 years. For observed-only and all-cases analyses, the effect of the baseline intervention on 7-day point-prevalence abstinence at the 10 years follow-up was statistically non-significant. However, when taking into account all repeated measures, the intervention significantly influenced continual abstinence with odds ratio 1.32 (95% CI: 1.01–1.73; p=0.042). Baseline motivation, perceived self-efficacy to stop smoking, and nicotine dependency were independently associated with long-term continual smoking abstinence (all p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A conventional analysis failed to confirm a significant effect of the ED-initiated tobacco control intervention on the point-prevalence abstinence at 10 years. Results from a more integrative analysis nonetheless indicated an enduring intervention effect on continual abstinence among smokers first encountered in the emergency department setting 10 years earlier. European Publishing on behalf of the International Society for the Prevention of Tobacco Induced Diseases (ISPTID) 2019-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6751984/ /pubmed/31582937 http://dx.doi.org/10.18332/tid/105579 Text en © 2019 Weiss-Gerlach E https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Weiss-Gerlach, Edith
McCarthy, William J.
Wellmann, Jürgen
Graunke, Marie
Spies, Claudia
Neuner, Bruno
Secondary analysis of an RCT on Emergency Department-Initiated Tobacco Control: Repeatedly assessed point-prevalence abstinence up to 12 months and extension of results through a 10-year follow-up
title Secondary analysis of an RCT on Emergency Department-Initiated Tobacco Control: Repeatedly assessed point-prevalence abstinence up to 12 months and extension of results through a 10-year follow-up
title_full Secondary analysis of an RCT on Emergency Department-Initiated Tobacco Control: Repeatedly assessed point-prevalence abstinence up to 12 months and extension of results through a 10-year follow-up
title_fullStr Secondary analysis of an RCT on Emergency Department-Initiated Tobacco Control: Repeatedly assessed point-prevalence abstinence up to 12 months and extension of results through a 10-year follow-up
title_full_unstemmed Secondary analysis of an RCT on Emergency Department-Initiated Tobacco Control: Repeatedly assessed point-prevalence abstinence up to 12 months and extension of results through a 10-year follow-up
title_short Secondary analysis of an RCT on Emergency Department-Initiated Tobacco Control: Repeatedly assessed point-prevalence abstinence up to 12 months and extension of results through a 10-year follow-up
title_sort secondary analysis of an rct on emergency department-initiated tobacco control: repeatedly assessed point-prevalence abstinence up to 12 months and extension of results through a 10-year follow-up
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6751984/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31582937
http://dx.doi.org/10.18332/tid/105579
work_keys_str_mv AT weissgerlachedith secondaryanalysisofanrctonemergencydepartmentinitiatedtobaccocontrolrepeatedlyassessedpointprevalenceabstinenceupto12monthsandextensionofresultsthrougha10yearfollowup
AT mccarthywilliamj secondaryanalysisofanrctonemergencydepartmentinitiatedtobaccocontrolrepeatedlyassessedpointprevalenceabstinenceupto12monthsandextensionofresultsthrougha10yearfollowup
AT wellmannjurgen secondaryanalysisofanrctonemergencydepartmentinitiatedtobaccocontrolrepeatedlyassessedpointprevalenceabstinenceupto12monthsandextensionofresultsthrougha10yearfollowup
AT graunkemarie secondaryanalysisofanrctonemergencydepartmentinitiatedtobaccocontrolrepeatedlyassessedpointprevalenceabstinenceupto12monthsandextensionofresultsthrougha10yearfollowup
AT spiesclaudia secondaryanalysisofanrctonemergencydepartmentinitiatedtobaccocontrolrepeatedlyassessedpointprevalenceabstinenceupto12monthsandextensionofresultsthrougha10yearfollowup
AT neunerbruno secondaryanalysisofanrctonemergencydepartmentinitiatedtobaccocontrolrepeatedlyassessedpointprevalenceabstinenceupto12monthsandextensionofresultsthrougha10yearfollowup