Cargando…

Can Grafted Tubularized Incised Plate Urethroplasty be Used to Repair Narrow Urethral Plate Hypospadias? Its Functional Evaluation Using Uroflowmetry

AIM: Using uroflowmetry, the aim of this study is to determine the functional results of the grafted tubularized incised plate (GTIP) urethroplasty used to repair poor urethral plate hypospadias. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Seventy-one patients (mean age: 5.7 years, follow-up: 1–5.5 years) were selected fr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Pan, Pradyumna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6752077/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31571754
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jiaps.JIAPS_151_18
_version_ 1783452728166449152
author Pan, Pradyumna
author_facet Pan, Pradyumna
author_sort Pan, Pradyumna
collection PubMed
description AIM: Using uroflowmetry, the aim of this study is to determine the functional results of the grafted tubularized incised plate (GTIP) urethroplasty used to repair poor urethral plate hypospadias. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Seventy-one patients (mean age: 5.7 years, follow-up: 1–5.5 years) were selected from those who underwent surgery using the GTIP technique from 2013 to 2015 at our institution. METHODS: Patients included were able to void voluntarily and had no fistula. The flow pattern, maximum urinary flow rate (Q(max)), voided volume (vv), average flow rate, and voiding time were measured. The results were expressed as percentiles and interpreted according to Siroky nomogram. The Q(max) was considered normal if >25(th) percentile, as equivocally obstructed when in the 5(th)–25(th) percentile, and obstructed if <5(th) percentile. RESULTS: Hypospadias was distal in 45, mid penile in 17 and proximal penile in 9. The uroflow curve was bell-shaped in 24 (30%), interrupted in 9 (14%), slightly flattened in 31 (46%), and a plateau in 7 (10%). Flow rate nomograms revealed that 49 (68%) were above the 25(th) percentile, 9 (17%) were below the 5(th) percentile, and 13 (15%) were between these ranges. Eleven patients showed improvement in the flow curve and maximum urinary flow rate (Q(max)) in follow-up uroflowmetry. CONCLUSION: GTIP repair provides satisfactory functional results. A long-term follow-up is needed to confirm these results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6752077
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67520772019-10-01 Can Grafted Tubularized Incised Plate Urethroplasty be Used to Repair Narrow Urethral Plate Hypospadias? Its Functional Evaluation Using Uroflowmetry Pan, Pradyumna J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg Original Article AIM: Using uroflowmetry, the aim of this study is to determine the functional results of the grafted tubularized incised plate (GTIP) urethroplasty used to repair poor urethral plate hypospadias. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Seventy-one patients (mean age: 5.7 years, follow-up: 1–5.5 years) were selected from those who underwent surgery using the GTIP technique from 2013 to 2015 at our institution. METHODS: Patients included were able to void voluntarily and had no fistula. The flow pattern, maximum urinary flow rate (Q(max)), voided volume (vv), average flow rate, and voiding time were measured. The results were expressed as percentiles and interpreted according to Siroky nomogram. The Q(max) was considered normal if >25(th) percentile, as equivocally obstructed when in the 5(th)–25(th) percentile, and obstructed if <5(th) percentile. RESULTS: Hypospadias was distal in 45, mid penile in 17 and proximal penile in 9. The uroflow curve was bell-shaped in 24 (30%), interrupted in 9 (14%), slightly flattened in 31 (46%), and a plateau in 7 (10%). Flow rate nomograms revealed that 49 (68%) were above the 25(th) percentile, 9 (17%) were below the 5(th) percentile, and 13 (15%) were between these ranges. Eleven patients showed improvement in the flow curve and maximum urinary flow rate (Q(max)) in follow-up uroflowmetry. CONCLUSION: GTIP repair provides satisfactory functional results. A long-term follow-up is needed to confirm these results. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6752077/ /pubmed/31571754 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jiaps.JIAPS_151_18 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Pan, Pradyumna
Can Grafted Tubularized Incised Plate Urethroplasty be Used to Repair Narrow Urethral Plate Hypospadias? Its Functional Evaluation Using Uroflowmetry
title Can Grafted Tubularized Incised Plate Urethroplasty be Used to Repair Narrow Urethral Plate Hypospadias? Its Functional Evaluation Using Uroflowmetry
title_full Can Grafted Tubularized Incised Plate Urethroplasty be Used to Repair Narrow Urethral Plate Hypospadias? Its Functional Evaluation Using Uroflowmetry
title_fullStr Can Grafted Tubularized Incised Plate Urethroplasty be Used to Repair Narrow Urethral Plate Hypospadias? Its Functional Evaluation Using Uroflowmetry
title_full_unstemmed Can Grafted Tubularized Incised Plate Urethroplasty be Used to Repair Narrow Urethral Plate Hypospadias? Its Functional Evaluation Using Uroflowmetry
title_short Can Grafted Tubularized Incised Plate Urethroplasty be Used to Repair Narrow Urethral Plate Hypospadias? Its Functional Evaluation Using Uroflowmetry
title_sort can grafted tubularized incised plate urethroplasty be used to repair narrow urethral plate hypospadias? its functional evaluation using uroflowmetry
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6752077/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31571754
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jiaps.JIAPS_151_18
work_keys_str_mv AT panpradyumna cangraftedtubularizedincisedplateurethroplastybeusedtorepairnarrowurethralplatehypospadiasitsfunctionalevaluationusinguroflowmetry