Cargando…
Detection of structural variation using target captured next-generation sequencing data for genetic diagnostic testing
PURPOSE: Structural variation (SV) is associated with inherited diseases. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is an efficient method for SV detection because of its high-throughput, low cost, and base-pair resolution. However, due to lack of standard NGS protocols and a limited number of clinical sampl...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group US
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6752280/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30563988 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41436-018-0397-6 |
_version_ | 1783452755510165504 |
---|---|
author | Mu, Wenbo Li, Bing Wu, Sitao Chen, Jefferey Sain, Divya Xu, Dong Black, Mary Helen Karam, Rachid Gillespie, Katrina Farwell Hagman, Kelly D. Guidugli, Lucia Pronold, Melissa Elliott, Aaron Lu, Hsiao-Mei |
author_facet | Mu, Wenbo Li, Bing Wu, Sitao Chen, Jefferey Sain, Divya Xu, Dong Black, Mary Helen Karam, Rachid Gillespie, Katrina Farwell Hagman, Kelly D. Guidugli, Lucia Pronold, Melissa Elliott, Aaron Lu, Hsiao-Mei |
author_sort | Mu, Wenbo |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Structural variation (SV) is associated with inherited diseases. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is an efficient method for SV detection because of its high-throughput, low cost, and base-pair resolution. However, due to lack of standard NGS protocols and a limited number of clinical samples with pathogenic SVs, comprehensive standards for SV detection, interpretation, and reporting are to be established. METHODS: We performed SV assessment on 60,000 clinical samples tested with hereditary cancer NGS panels spanning 48 genes. To evaluate NGS results, NGS and orthogonal methods were used separately in a blinded fashion for SV detection in all samples. RESULTS: A total of 1,037 SVs in coding sequence (CDS) or untranslated regions (UTRs) and 30,847 SVs in introns were detected and validated. Across all variant types, NGS shows 100% sensitivity and 99.9% specificity. Overall, 64% of CDS/UTR SVs were classified as pathogenic/likely pathogenic, and five deletions/duplications were reclassified as pathogenic using breakpoint information from NGS. CONCLUSION: The SVs presented here can be used as a valuable resource for clinical research and diagnostics. The data illustrate NGS as a powerful tool for SV detection. Application of NGS and confirmation technologies in genetic testing ensures delivering accurate and reliable results for diagnosis and patient care. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6752280 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67522802019-09-23 Detection of structural variation using target captured next-generation sequencing data for genetic diagnostic testing Mu, Wenbo Li, Bing Wu, Sitao Chen, Jefferey Sain, Divya Xu, Dong Black, Mary Helen Karam, Rachid Gillespie, Katrina Farwell Hagman, Kelly D. Guidugli, Lucia Pronold, Melissa Elliott, Aaron Lu, Hsiao-Mei Genet Med Article PURPOSE: Structural variation (SV) is associated with inherited diseases. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is an efficient method for SV detection because of its high-throughput, low cost, and base-pair resolution. However, due to lack of standard NGS protocols and a limited number of clinical samples with pathogenic SVs, comprehensive standards for SV detection, interpretation, and reporting are to be established. METHODS: We performed SV assessment on 60,000 clinical samples tested with hereditary cancer NGS panels spanning 48 genes. To evaluate NGS results, NGS and orthogonal methods were used separately in a blinded fashion for SV detection in all samples. RESULTS: A total of 1,037 SVs in coding sequence (CDS) or untranslated regions (UTRs) and 30,847 SVs in introns were detected and validated. Across all variant types, NGS shows 100% sensitivity and 99.9% specificity. Overall, 64% of CDS/UTR SVs were classified as pathogenic/likely pathogenic, and five deletions/duplications were reclassified as pathogenic using breakpoint information from NGS. CONCLUSION: The SVs presented here can be used as a valuable resource for clinical research and diagnostics. The data illustrate NGS as a powerful tool for SV detection. Application of NGS and confirmation technologies in genetic testing ensures delivering accurate and reliable results for diagnosis and patient care. Nature Publishing Group US 2018-12-19 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6752280/ /pubmed/30563988 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41436-018-0397-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, and provide a link to the Creative Commons license. You do not have permission under this license to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Mu, Wenbo Li, Bing Wu, Sitao Chen, Jefferey Sain, Divya Xu, Dong Black, Mary Helen Karam, Rachid Gillespie, Katrina Farwell Hagman, Kelly D. Guidugli, Lucia Pronold, Melissa Elliott, Aaron Lu, Hsiao-Mei Detection of structural variation using target captured next-generation sequencing data for genetic diagnostic testing |
title | Detection of structural variation using target captured next-generation sequencing data for genetic diagnostic testing |
title_full | Detection of structural variation using target captured next-generation sequencing data for genetic diagnostic testing |
title_fullStr | Detection of structural variation using target captured next-generation sequencing data for genetic diagnostic testing |
title_full_unstemmed | Detection of structural variation using target captured next-generation sequencing data for genetic diagnostic testing |
title_short | Detection of structural variation using target captured next-generation sequencing data for genetic diagnostic testing |
title_sort | detection of structural variation using target captured next-generation sequencing data for genetic diagnostic testing |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6752280/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30563988 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41436-018-0397-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT muwenbo detectionofstructuralvariationusingtargetcapturednextgenerationsequencingdataforgeneticdiagnostictesting AT libing detectionofstructuralvariationusingtargetcapturednextgenerationsequencingdataforgeneticdiagnostictesting AT wusitao detectionofstructuralvariationusingtargetcapturednextgenerationsequencingdataforgeneticdiagnostictesting AT chenjefferey detectionofstructuralvariationusingtargetcapturednextgenerationsequencingdataforgeneticdiagnostictesting AT saindivya detectionofstructuralvariationusingtargetcapturednextgenerationsequencingdataforgeneticdiagnostictesting AT xudong detectionofstructuralvariationusingtargetcapturednextgenerationsequencingdataforgeneticdiagnostictesting AT blackmaryhelen detectionofstructuralvariationusingtargetcapturednextgenerationsequencingdataforgeneticdiagnostictesting AT karamrachid detectionofstructuralvariationusingtargetcapturednextgenerationsequencingdataforgeneticdiagnostictesting AT gillespiekatrina detectionofstructuralvariationusingtargetcapturednextgenerationsequencingdataforgeneticdiagnostictesting AT farwellhagmankellyd detectionofstructuralvariationusingtargetcapturednextgenerationsequencingdataforgeneticdiagnostictesting AT guiduglilucia detectionofstructuralvariationusingtargetcapturednextgenerationsequencingdataforgeneticdiagnostictesting AT pronoldmelissa detectionofstructuralvariationusingtargetcapturednextgenerationsequencingdataforgeneticdiagnostictesting AT elliottaaron detectionofstructuralvariationusingtargetcapturednextgenerationsequencingdataforgeneticdiagnostictesting AT luhsiaomei detectionofstructuralvariationusingtargetcapturednextgenerationsequencingdataforgeneticdiagnostictesting |