Cargando…

Detection of structural variation using target captured next-generation sequencing data for genetic diagnostic testing

PURPOSE: Structural variation (SV) is associated with inherited diseases. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is an efficient method for SV detection because of its high-throughput, low cost, and base-pair resolution. However, due to lack of standard NGS protocols and a limited number of clinical sampl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mu, Wenbo, Li, Bing, Wu, Sitao, Chen, Jefferey, Sain, Divya, Xu, Dong, Black, Mary Helen, Karam, Rachid, Gillespie, Katrina, Farwell Hagman, Kelly D., Guidugli, Lucia, Pronold, Melissa, Elliott, Aaron, Lu, Hsiao-Mei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group US 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6752280/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30563988
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41436-018-0397-6
_version_ 1783452755510165504
author Mu, Wenbo
Li, Bing
Wu, Sitao
Chen, Jefferey
Sain, Divya
Xu, Dong
Black, Mary Helen
Karam, Rachid
Gillespie, Katrina
Farwell Hagman, Kelly D.
Guidugli, Lucia
Pronold, Melissa
Elliott, Aaron
Lu, Hsiao-Mei
author_facet Mu, Wenbo
Li, Bing
Wu, Sitao
Chen, Jefferey
Sain, Divya
Xu, Dong
Black, Mary Helen
Karam, Rachid
Gillespie, Katrina
Farwell Hagman, Kelly D.
Guidugli, Lucia
Pronold, Melissa
Elliott, Aaron
Lu, Hsiao-Mei
author_sort Mu, Wenbo
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Structural variation (SV) is associated with inherited diseases. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is an efficient method for SV detection because of its high-throughput, low cost, and base-pair resolution. However, due to lack of standard NGS protocols and a limited number of clinical samples with pathogenic SVs, comprehensive standards for SV detection, interpretation, and reporting are to be established. METHODS: We performed SV assessment on 60,000 clinical samples tested with hereditary cancer NGS panels spanning 48 genes. To evaluate NGS results, NGS and orthogonal methods were used separately in a blinded fashion for SV detection in all samples. RESULTS: A total of 1,037 SVs in coding sequence (CDS) or untranslated regions (UTRs) and 30,847 SVs in introns were detected and validated. Across all variant types, NGS shows 100% sensitivity and 99.9% specificity. Overall, 64% of CDS/UTR SVs were classified as pathogenic/likely pathogenic, and five deletions/duplications were reclassified as pathogenic using breakpoint information from NGS. CONCLUSION: The SVs presented here can be used as a valuable resource for clinical research and diagnostics. The data illustrate NGS as a powerful tool for SV detection. Application of NGS and confirmation technologies in genetic testing ensures delivering accurate and reliable results for diagnosis and patient care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6752280
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Nature Publishing Group US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67522802019-09-23 Detection of structural variation using target captured next-generation sequencing data for genetic diagnostic testing Mu, Wenbo Li, Bing Wu, Sitao Chen, Jefferey Sain, Divya Xu, Dong Black, Mary Helen Karam, Rachid Gillespie, Katrina Farwell Hagman, Kelly D. Guidugli, Lucia Pronold, Melissa Elliott, Aaron Lu, Hsiao-Mei Genet Med Article PURPOSE: Structural variation (SV) is associated with inherited diseases. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is an efficient method for SV detection because of its high-throughput, low cost, and base-pair resolution. However, due to lack of standard NGS protocols and a limited number of clinical samples with pathogenic SVs, comprehensive standards for SV detection, interpretation, and reporting are to be established. METHODS: We performed SV assessment on 60,000 clinical samples tested with hereditary cancer NGS panels spanning 48 genes. To evaluate NGS results, NGS and orthogonal methods were used separately in a blinded fashion for SV detection in all samples. RESULTS: A total of 1,037 SVs in coding sequence (CDS) or untranslated regions (UTRs) and 30,847 SVs in introns were detected and validated. Across all variant types, NGS shows 100% sensitivity and 99.9% specificity. Overall, 64% of CDS/UTR SVs were classified as pathogenic/likely pathogenic, and five deletions/duplications were reclassified as pathogenic using breakpoint information from NGS. CONCLUSION: The SVs presented here can be used as a valuable resource for clinical research and diagnostics. The data illustrate NGS as a powerful tool for SV detection. Application of NGS and confirmation technologies in genetic testing ensures delivering accurate and reliable results for diagnosis and patient care. Nature Publishing Group US 2018-12-19 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6752280/ /pubmed/30563988 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41436-018-0397-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, and provide a link to the Creative Commons license. You do not have permission under this license to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Mu, Wenbo
Li, Bing
Wu, Sitao
Chen, Jefferey
Sain, Divya
Xu, Dong
Black, Mary Helen
Karam, Rachid
Gillespie, Katrina
Farwell Hagman, Kelly D.
Guidugli, Lucia
Pronold, Melissa
Elliott, Aaron
Lu, Hsiao-Mei
Detection of structural variation using target captured next-generation sequencing data for genetic diagnostic testing
title Detection of structural variation using target captured next-generation sequencing data for genetic diagnostic testing
title_full Detection of structural variation using target captured next-generation sequencing data for genetic diagnostic testing
title_fullStr Detection of structural variation using target captured next-generation sequencing data for genetic diagnostic testing
title_full_unstemmed Detection of structural variation using target captured next-generation sequencing data for genetic diagnostic testing
title_short Detection of structural variation using target captured next-generation sequencing data for genetic diagnostic testing
title_sort detection of structural variation using target captured next-generation sequencing data for genetic diagnostic testing
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6752280/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30563988
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41436-018-0397-6
work_keys_str_mv AT muwenbo detectionofstructuralvariationusingtargetcapturednextgenerationsequencingdataforgeneticdiagnostictesting
AT libing detectionofstructuralvariationusingtargetcapturednextgenerationsequencingdataforgeneticdiagnostictesting
AT wusitao detectionofstructuralvariationusingtargetcapturednextgenerationsequencingdataforgeneticdiagnostictesting
AT chenjefferey detectionofstructuralvariationusingtargetcapturednextgenerationsequencingdataforgeneticdiagnostictesting
AT saindivya detectionofstructuralvariationusingtargetcapturednextgenerationsequencingdataforgeneticdiagnostictesting
AT xudong detectionofstructuralvariationusingtargetcapturednextgenerationsequencingdataforgeneticdiagnostictesting
AT blackmaryhelen detectionofstructuralvariationusingtargetcapturednextgenerationsequencingdataforgeneticdiagnostictesting
AT karamrachid detectionofstructuralvariationusingtargetcapturednextgenerationsequencingdataforgeneticdiagnostictesting
AT gillespiekatrina detectionofstructuralvariationusingtargetcapturednextgenerationsequencingdataforgeneticdiagnostictesting
AT farwellhagmankellyd detectionofstructuralvariationusingtargetcapturednextgenerationsequencingdataforgeneticdiagnostictesting
AT guiduglilucia detectionofstructuralvariationusingtargetcapturednextgenerationsequencingdataforgeneticdiagnostictesting
AT pronoldmelissa detectionofstructuralvariationusingtargetcapturednextgenerationsequencingdataforgeneticdiagnostictesting
AT elliottaaron detectionofstructuralvariationusingtargetcapturednextgenerationsequencingdataforgeneticdiagnostictesting
AT luhsiaomei detectionofstructuralvariationusingtargetcapturednextgenerationsequencingdataforgeneticdiagnostictesting