Cargando…

Cardiac resynchronization therapy-heart failure (CRT-HF) clinic: A novel model of care

BACKGROUND: Post-implant care of patients with heart failure (HF) undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is not addressed in current HF or CRT guidelines and is often fragmented with poor communication between specialties. We sought to develop a new model of post-CRT care which could be...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gorodeski, Eiran Z., Magnelli-Reyes, Christina, Moennich, Laurie Ann, Grimaldi, Adam, Rickard, John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6752801/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31536565
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222610
_version_ 1783452789119123456
author Gorodeski, Eiran Z.
Magnelli-Reyes, Christina
Moennich, Laurie Ann
Grimaldi, Adam
Rickard, John
author_facet Gorodeski, Eiran Z.
Magnelli-Reyes, Christina
Moennich, Laurie Ann
Grimaldi, Adam
Rickard, John
author_sort Gorodeski, Eiran Z.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Post-implant care of patients with heart failure (HF) undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is not addressed in current HF or CRT guidelines and is often fragmented with poor communication between specialties. We sought to develop a new model of post-CRT care which could be implemented in busy clinical settings. METHODS AND RESULTS: We designed a novel, multidisciplinary approach to standardizing post CRT care. All patients receiving a CRT device at the Cleveland Clinic between March 2017 and August 2018 were invited to be seen in the clinic 6 months post implant. A one-time collaborative visit encompassing cardiac imaging, heart failure, and electrophysiology care was performed. We recorded the operational feasibility of the clinic in terms of patient throughput as well as patient characteristics, interventions, and new diagnoses made. Between September 2017 and February 2019, 150 patients were seen in the clinic. Of these, 125 patients had their index CRT implanted for standard indications and were included in the current analysis. Approximately 45 minutes were dedicated for each patient visit. Interventions in care were made in 95% of patients, with CRT non-responders offered a higher number of interventions as compared to responders (median 3 versus 2 interventions). Types of interventions were device-related (26% of population), medication-related (74%), and referral for alternate medical services (80%). CONCLUSIONS: Multidisciplinary post-implant care of patients with HF receiving CRT devices, regardless of CRT response status, is feasible and results in frequent medical interventions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6752801
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67528012019-09-27 Cardiac resynchronization therapy-heart failure (CRT-HF) clinic: A novel model of care Gorodeski, Eiran Z. Magnelli-Reyes, Christina Moennich, Laurie Ann Grimaldi, Adam Rickard, John PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Post-implant care of patients with heart failure (HF) undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is not addressed in current HF or CRT guidelines and is often fragmented with poor communication between specialties. We sought to develop a new model of post-CRT care which could be implemented in busy clinical settings. METHODS AND RESULTS: We designed a novel, multidisciplinary approach to standardizing post CRT care. All patients receiving a CRT device at the Cleveland Clinic between March 2017 and August 2018 were invited to be seen in the clinic 6 months post implant. A one-time collaborative visit encompassing cardiac imaging, heart failure, and electrophysiology care was performed. We recorded the operational feasibility of the clinic in terms of patient throughput as well as patient characteristics, interventions, and new diagnoses made. Between September 2017 and February 2019, 150 patients were seen in the clinic. Of these, 125 patients had their index CRT implanted for standard indications and were included in the current analysis. Approximately 45 minutes were dedicated for each patient visit. Interventions in care were made in 95% of patients, with CRT non-responders offered a higher number of interventions as compared to responders (median 3 versus 2 interventions). Types of interventions were device-related (26% of population), medication-related (74%), and referral for alternate medical services (80%). CONCLUSIONS: Multidisciplinary post-implant care of patients with HF receiving CRT devices, regardless of CRT response status, is feasible and results in frequent medical interventions. Public Library of Science 2019-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6752801/ /pubmed/31536565 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222610 Text en © 2019 Gorodeski et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gorodeski, Eiran Z.
Magnelli-Reyes, Christina
Moennich, Laurie Ann
Grimaldi, Adam
Rickard, John
Cardiac resynchronization therapy-heart failure (CRT-HF) clinic: A novel model of care
title Cardiac resynchronization therapy-heart failure (CRT-HF) clinic: A novel model of care
title_full Cardiac resynchronization therapy-heart failure (CRT-HF) clinic: A novel model of care
title_fullStr Cardiac resynchronization therapy-heart failure (CRT-HF) clinic: A novel model of care
title_full_unstemmed Cardiac resynchronization therapy-heart failure (CRT-HF) clinic: A novel model of care
title_short Cardiac resynchronization therapy-heart failure (CRT-HF) clinic: A novel model of care
title_sort cardiac resynchronization therapy-heart failure (crt-hf) clinic: a novel model of care
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6752801/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31536565
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222610
work_keys_str_mv AT gorodeskieiranz cardiacresynchronizationtherapyheartfailurecrthfclinicanovelmodelofcare
AT magnellireyeschristina cardiacresynchronizationtherapyheartfailurecrthfclinicanovelmodelofcare
AT moennichlaurieann cardiacresynchronizationtherapyheartfailurecrthfclinicanovelmodelofcare
AT grimaldiadam cardiacresynchronizationtherapyheartfailurecrthfclinicanovelmodelofcare
AT rickardjohn cardiacresynchronizationtherapyheartfailurecrthfclinicanovelmodelofcare