Cargando…
Comparison of climbing-specific strength and endurance between lead and boulder climbers
Albeit differences in climbing-specific strength of the forearms have been demonstrated between lead and boulder climbers, little is known about the potential differences in force and power output of the upper body pulling-apparatus between disciplines. The aim of this study was to compare the climb...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6752829/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31536569 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222529 |
_version_ | 1783452794312720384 |
---|---|
author | Stien, Nicolay Saeterbakken, Atle Hole Hermans, Espen Vereide, Vegard Albert Olsen, Elias Andersen, Vidar |
author_facet | Stien, Nicolay Saeterbakken, Atle Hole Hermans, Espen Vereide, Vegard Albert Olsen, Elias Andersen, Vidar |
author_sort | Stien, Nicolay |
collection | PubMed |
description | Albeit differences in climbing-specific strength of the forearms have been demonstrated between lead and boulder climbers, little is known about the potential differences in force and power output of the upper body pulling-apparatus between disciplines. The aim of this study was to compare the climbing-specific upper-body strength and finger flexor endurance between lead and boulder climbers, as well as to examine the relative utilization of force when testing on a ledge hold compared to a jug hold. Sixteen boulder climbers (red-point climbing grade 17.9 ± 3.3) and fifteen lead climbers (red-point climbing grade 20.5 ± 3.5) performing on an advanced level volunteered for the study. Peak force, average force and rate of force development (RFD) were measured during an isometric pull-up, average velocity in dynamic pull-up, and finger flexor endurance in an intermittent test to fatigue. The isometric pull-up was performed on a ledge hold (high finger strength requirements) and on a jug hold (very low finger strength requirements). Boulder climbers demonstrated a higher maximal and explosive strength in all strength and power measurements (26.2–52.9%, ES = 0.90–1.12, p = 0.006–0.023), whereas the finger flexor endurance test showed no significant difference between the groups (p = 0.088). Both groups were able to utilize 57–69% of peak force, average force and RFD in the ledge condition compared to the jug condition, but the relative utilization was not different between the groups (p = 0.290–0.996). In conclusion, boulder climbers were stronger and more explosive compared to lead climbers, whereas no differences in finger flexor endurance were observed. Performing climbing-specific tests on a smaller hold appears to limit the force and power output equally between the two groups. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6752829 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67528292019-09-27 Comparison of climbing-specific strength and endurance between lead and boulder climbers Stien, Nicolay Saeterbakken, Atle Hole Hermans, Espen Vereide, Vegard Albert Olsen, Elias Andersen, Vidar PLoS One Research Article Albeit differences in climbing-specific strength of the forearms have been demonstrated between lead and boulder climbers, little is known about the potential differences in force and power output of the upper body pulling-apparatus between disciplines. The aim of this study was to compare the climbing-specific upper-body strength and finger flexor endurance between lead and boulder climbers, as well as to examine the relative utilization of force when testing on a ledge hold compared to a jug hold. Sixteen boulder climbers (red-point climbing grade 17.9 ± 3.3) and fifteen lead climbers (red-point climbing grade 20.5 ± 3.5) performing on an advanced level volunteered for the study. Peak force, average force and rate of force development (RFD) were measured during an isometric pull-up, average velocity in dynamic pull-up, and finger flexor endurance in an intermittent test to fatigue. The isometric pull-up was performed on a ledge hold (high finger strength requirements) and on a jug hold (very low finger strength requirements). Boulder climbers demonstrated a higher maximal and explosive strength in all strength and power measurements (26.2–52.9%, ES = 0.90–1.12, p = 0.006–0.023), whereas the finger flexor endurance test showed no significant difference between the groups (p = 0.088). Both groups were able to utilize 57–69% of peak force, average force and RFD in the ledge condition compared to the jug condition, but the relative utilization was not different between the groups (p = 0.290–0.996). In conclusion, boulder climbers were stronger and more explosive compared to lead climbers, whereas no differences in finger flexor endurance were observed. Performing climbing-specific tests on a smaller hold appears to limit the force and power output equally between the two groups. Public Library of Science 2019-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6752829/ /pubmed/31536569 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222529 Text en © 2019 Stien et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Stien, Nicolay Saeterbakken, Atle Hole Hermans, Espen Vereide, Vegard Albert Olsen, Elias Andersen, Vidar Comparison of climbing-specific strength and endurance between lead and boulder climbers |
title | Comparison of climbing-specific strength and endurance between lead and boulder climbers |
title_full | Comparison of climbing-specific strength and endurance between lead and boulder climbers |
title_fullStr | Comparison of climbing-specific strength and endurance between lead and boulder climbers |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of climbing-specific strength and endurance between lead and boulder climbers |
title_short | Comparison of climbing-specific strength and endurance between lead and boulder climbers |
title_sort | comparison of climbing-specific strength and endurance between lead and boulder climbers |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6752829/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31536569 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222529 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stiennicolay comparisonofclimbingspecificstrengthandendurancebetweenleadandboulderclimbers AT saeterbakkenatlehole comparisonofclimbingspecificstrengthandendurancebetweenleadandboulderclimbers AT hermansespen comparisonofclimbingspecificstrengthandendurancebetweenleadandboulderclimbers AT vereidevegardalbert comparisonofclimbingspecificstrengthandendurancebetweenleadandboulderclimbers AT olsenelias comparisonofclimbingspecificstrengthandendurancebetweenleadandboulderclimbers AT andersenvidar comparisonofclimbingspecificstrengthandendurancebetweenleadandboulderclimbers |