Cargando…

Comparing infiltration rates in soils managed with conventional and alternative farming methods: A meta-analysis

Identifying agricultural practices that enhance water cycling is critical, particularly with increased rainfall variability and greater risks of droughts and floods. Soil infiltration rates offer useful insights to water cycling in farming systems because they affect both yields (through soil water...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Basche, Andrea D., DeLonge, Marcia S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6752860/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31536506
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215702
_version_ 1783452801626537984
author Basche, Andrea D.
DeLonge, Marcia S.
author_facet Basche, Andrea D.
DeLonge, Marcia S.
author_sort Basche, Andrea D.
collection PubMed
description Identifying agricultural practices that enhance water cycling is critical, particularly with increased rainfall variability and greater risks of droughts and floods. Soil infiltration rates offer useful insights to water cycling in farming systems because they affect both yields (through soil water availability) and other ecosystem outcomes (such as pollution and flooding from runoff). For example, conventional agricultural practices that leave soils bare and vulnerable to degradation are believed to limit the capacity of soils to quickly absorb and retain water needed for crop growth. Further, it is widely assumed that farming methods such as no-till and cover crops can improve infiltration rates. Despite interest in the impacts of agricultural practices on infiltration rates, this effect has not been systematically quantified across a range of practices. To evaluate how conventional practices affect infiltration rates relative to select alternative practices (no-till, cover crops, crop rotation, introducing perennials, crop and livestock systems), we performed a meta-analysis that included 89 studies with field trials comparing at least one such alternative practice to conventional management. We found that introducing perennials (grasses, agroforestry, managed forestry) or cover crops led to the largest increases in infiltration rates (mean responses of 59.2 ± 20.9% and 34.8 ± 7.7%, respectively). Also, although the overall effect of no-till was non-significant (5.7 ± 9.7%), the practice led to increases in wetter climates and when combined with residue retention. The effect of crop rotation on infiltration rate was non-significant (18.5 ± 13.2%), and studies evaluating impacts of grazing on croplands indicated that this practice reduced infiltration rates (-21.3 ± 14.9%). Findings suggest that practices promoting ground cover and continuous roots, both of which improve soil structure, were most effective at increasing infiltration rates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6752860
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67528602019-09-27 Comparing infiltration rates in soils managed with conventional and alternative farming methods: A meta-analysis Basche, Andrea D. DeLonge, Marcia S. PLoS One Research Article Identifying agricultural practices that enhance water cycling is critical, particularly with increased rainfall variability and greater risks of droughts and floods. Soil infiltration rates offer useful insights to water cycling in farming systems because they affect both yields (through soil water availability) and other ecosystem outcomes (such as pollution and flooding from runoff). For example, conventional agricultural practices that leave soils bare and vulnerable to degradation are believed to limit the capacity of soils to quickly absorb and retain water needed for crop growth. Further, it is widely assumed that farming methods such as no-till and cover crops can improve infiltration rates. Despite interest in the impacts of agricultural practices on infiltration rates, this effect has not been systematically quantified across a range of practices. To evaluate how conventional practices affect infiltration rates relative to select alternative practices (no-till, cover crops, crop rotation, introducing perennials, crop and livestock systems), we performed a meta-analysis that included 89 studies with field trials comparing at least one such alternative practice to conventional management. We found that introducing perennials (grasses, agroforestry, managed forestry) or cover crops led to the largest increases in infiltration rates (mean responses of 59.2 ± 20.9% and 34.8 ± 7.7%, respectively). Also, although the overall effect of no-till was non-significant (5.7 ± 9.7%), the practice led to increases in wetter climates and when combined with residue retention. The effect of crop rotation on infiltration rate was non-significant (18.5 ± 13.2%), and studies evaluating impacts of grazing on croplands indicated that this practice reduced infiltration rates (-21.3 ± 14.9%). Findings suggest that practices promoting ground cover and continuous roots, both of which improve soil structure, were most effective at increasing infiltration rates. Public Library of Science 2019-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6752860/ /pubmed/31536506 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215702 Text en © 2019 Basche, DeLonge http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Basche, Andrea D.
DeLonge, Marcia S.
Comparing infiltration rates in soils managed with conventional and alternative farming methods: A meta-analysis
title Comparing infiltration rates in soils managed with conventional and alternative farming methods: A meta-analysis
title_full Comparing infiltration rates in soils managed with conventional and alternative farming methods: A meta-analysis
title_fullStr Comparing infiltration rates in soils managed with conventional and alternative farming methods: A meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparing infiltration rates in soils managed with conventional and alternative farming methods: A meta-analysis
title_short Comparing infiltration rates in soils managed with conventional and alternative farming methods: A meta-analysis
title_sort comparing infiltration rates in soils managed with conventional and alternative farming methods: a meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6752860/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31536506
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215702
work_keys_str_mv AT bascheandread comparinginfiltrationratesinsoilsmanagedwithconventionalandalternativefarmingmethodsametaanalysis
AT delongemarcias comparinginfiltrationratesinsoilsmanagedwithconventionalandalternativefarmingmethodsametaanalysis