Cargando…
Enzymatic liver function measured by LiMAx – a reliable diagnostic and prognostic tool in chronic liver disease
Chronic liver disease (CLD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Non-invasive assessment of hepatic disease severity represents a relevant issue to further improve clinical management and therapeutic treatment. We retrospectively compared the diagnostic and prognostic performance o...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6753134/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31537822 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-49746-1 |
_version_ | 1783452835063529472 |
---|---|
author | Buechter, Matthias Kersting, Sarah Gerken, Guido Kahraman, Alisan |
author_facet | Buechter, Matthias Kersting, Sarah Gerken, Guido Kahraman, Alisan |
author_sort | Buechter, Matthias |
collection | PubMed |
description | Chronic liver disease (CLD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Non-invasive assessment of hepatic disease severity represents a relevant issue to further improve clinical management and therapeutic treatment. We retrospectively compared the diagnostic and prognostic performance of different non-invasive tools (LiMAx, transient elastography (TE), and biomarkers) in detecting different severity stages during the course of CLD. Patients were divided into four groups based on clinical parameters: (1) patients without CLD (control group), (2) patients suffering from CLD without having cirrhosis, (3) patients with CLD and compensated cirrhosis, and finally, (4) patients with CLD and decompensated cirrhosis. Patients with acute liver failure were excluded from the analysis. A total of 464 patients who underwent LiMAx measurement at the University Clinic of Essen between 10/2016 and 11/2017 were included in this study. Distribution of the different groups were n = 72 patients for group 1, n = 134 patients for group 2, n = 160 patients for group 3, and n = 98 patients for group 4, respectively. Median LiMAx values significantly declined with respect to increasing degree of CLD: (1) 510 µg/h/kg, (2) 390 µg/h/kg, (3) 264 µg/h/kg, and (4) 151 µg/h/kg (p < 0.001). When comparing the diagnostic accuracy of the LiMAx test in detecting patients with presence of cirrhosis (groups 1 and 2 vs. groups 3 and 4), an AUROC of 0.942 was found (cut-off 322 µg/h/kg, sensitivity 86.1%, specificity 91.3%, p < 0.0001). LiMAx was superior to TE and serum biomarkers in predicting patients’ outcome by 90-day mortality (AUROC 0.811, p < 0.001). Enzymatic liver function measured by LiMAx was closely associated with different severity stages of CLD and was a reliable diagnostic and prognostic tool with an accuracy comparable to current standard methods. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6753134 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67531342019-10-01 Enzymatic liver function measured by LiMAx – a reliable diagnostic and prognostic tool in chronic liver disease Buechter, Matthias Kersting, Sarah Gerken, Guido Kahraman, Alisan Sci Rep Article Chronic liver disease (CLD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Non-invasive assessment of hepatic disease severity represents a relevant issue to further improve clinical management and therapeutic treatment. We retrospectively compared the diagnostic and prognostic performance of different non-invasive tools (LiMAx, transient elastography (TE), and biomarkers) in detecting different severity stages during the course of CLD. Patients were divided into four groups based on clinical parameters: (1) patients without CLD (control group), (2) patients suffering from CLD without having cirrhosis, (3) patients with CLD and compensated cirrhosis, and finally, (4) patients with CLD and decompensated cirrhosis. Patients with acute liver failure were excluded from the analysis. A total of 464 patients who underwent LiMAx measurement at the University Clinic of Essen between 10/2016 and 11/2017 were included in this study. Distribution of the different groups were n = 72 patients for group 1, n = 134 patients for group 2, n = 160 patients for group 3, and n = 98 patients for group 4, respectively. Median LiMAx values significantly declined with respect to increasing degree of CLD: (1) 510 µg/h/kg, (2) 390 µg/h/kg, (3) 264 µg/h/kg, and (4) 151 µg/h/kg (p < 0.001). When comparing the diagnostic accuracy of the LiMAx test in detecting patients with presence of cirrhosis (groups 1 and 2 vs. groups 3 and 4), an AUROC of 0.942 was found (cut-off 322 µg/h/kg, sensitivity 86.1%, specificity 91.3%, p < 0.0001). LiMAx was superior to TE and serum biomarkers in predicting patients’ outcome by 90-day mortality (AUROC 0.811, p < 0.001). Enzymatic liver function measured by LiMAx was closely associated with different severity stages of CLD and was a reliable diagnostic and prognostic tool with an accuracy comparable to current standard methods. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6753134/ /pubmed/31537822 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-49746-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Buechter, Matthias Kersting, Sarah Gerken, Guido Kahraman, Alisan Enzymatic liver function measured by LiMAx – a reliable diagnostic and prognostic tool in chronic liver disease |
title | Enzymatic liver function measured by LiMAx – a reliable diagnostic and prognostic tool in chronic liver disease |
title_full | Enzymatic liver function measured by LiMAx – a reliable diagnostic and prognostic tool in chronic liver disease |
title_fullStr | Enzymatic liver function measured by LiMAx – a reliable diagnostic and prognostic tool in chronic liver disease |
title_full_unstemmed | Enzymatic liver function measured by LiMAx – a reliable diagnostic and prognostic tool in chronic liver disease |
title_short | Enzymatic liver function measured by LiMAx – a reliable diagnostic and prognostic tool in chronic liver disease |
title_sort | enzymatic liver function measured by limax – a reliable diagnostic and prognostic tool in chronic liver disease |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6753134/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31537822 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-49746-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT buechtermatthias enzymaticliverfunctionmeasuredbylimaxareliablediagnosticandprognostictoolinchronicliverdisease AT kerstingsarah enzymaticliverfunctionmeasuredbylimaxareliablediagnosticandprognostictoolinchronicliverdisease AT gerkenguido enzymaticliverfunctionmeasuredbylimaxareliablediagnosticandprognostictoolinchronicliverdisease AT kahramanalisan enzymaticliverfunctionmeasuredbylimaxareliablediagnosticandprognostictoolinchronicliverdisease |