Cargando…

Enzymatic liver function measured by LiMAx – a reliable diagnostic and prognostic tool in chronic liver disease

Chronic liver disease (CLD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Non-invasive assessment of hepatic disease severity represents a relevant issue to further improve clinical management and therapeutic treatment. We retrospectively compared the diagnostic and prognostic performance o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Buechter, Matthias, Kersting, Sarah, Gerken, Guido, Kahraman, Alisan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6753134/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31537822
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-49746-1
_version_ 1783452835063529472
author Buechter, Matthias
Kersting, Sarah
Gerken, Guido
Kahraman, Alisan
author_facet Buechter, Matthias
Kersting, Sarah
Gerken, Guido
Kahraman, Alisan
author_sort Buechter, Matthias
collection PubMed
description Chronic liver disease (CLD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Non-invasive assessment of hepatic disease severity represents a relevant issue to further improve clinical management and therapeutic treatment. We retrospectively compared the diagnostic and prognostic performance of different non-invasive tools (LiMAx, transient elastography (TE), and biomarkers) in detecting different severity stages during the course of CLD. Patients were divided into four groups based on clinical parameters: (1) patients without CLD (control group), (2) patients suffering from CLD without having cirrhosis, (3) patients with CLD and compensated cirrhosis, and finally, (4) patients with CLD and decompensated cirrhosis. Patients with acute liver failure were excluded from the analysis. A total of 464 patients who underwent LiMAx measurement at the University Clinic of Essen between 10/2016 and 11/2017 were included in this study. Distribution of the different groups were n = 72 patients for group 1, n = 134 patients for group 2, n = 160 patients for group 3, and n = 98 patients for group 4, respectively. Median LiMAx values significantly declined with respect to increasing degree of CLD: (1) 510 µg/h/kg, (2) 390 µg/h/kg, (3) 264 µg/h/kg, and (4) 151 µg/h/kg (p < 0.001). When comparing the diagnostic accuracy of the LiMAx test in detecting patients with presence of cirrhosis (groups 1 and 2 vs. groups 3 and 4), an AUROC of 0.942 was found (cut-off 322 µg/h/kg, sensitivity 86.1%, specificity 91.3%, p < 0.0001). LiMAx was superior to TE and serum biomarkers in predicting patients’ outcome by 90-day mortality (AUROC 0.811, p < 0.001). Enzymatic liver function measured by LiMAx was closely associated with different severity stages of CLD and was a reliable diagnostic and prognostic tool with an accuracy comparable to current standard methods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6753134
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67531342019-10-01 Enzymatic liver function measured by LiMAx – a reliable diagnostic and prognostic tool in chronic liver disease Buechter, Matthias Kersting, Sarah Gerken, Guido Kahraman, Alisan Sci Rep Article Chronic liver disease (CLD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Non-invasive assessment of hepatic disease severity represents a relevant issue to further improve clinical management and therapeutic treatment. We retrospectively compared the diagnostic and prognostic performance of different non-invasive tools (LiMAx, transient elastography (TE), and biomarkers) in detecting different severity stages during the course of CLD. Patients were divided into four groups based on clinical parameters: (1) patients without CLD (control group), (2) patients suffering from CLD without having cirrhosis, (3) patients with CLD and compensated cirrhosis, and finally, (4) patients with CLD and decompensated cirrhosis. Patients with acute liver failure were excluded from the analysis. A total of 464 patients who underwent LiMAx measurement at the University Clinic of Essen between 10/2016 and 11/2017 were included in this study. Distribution of the different groups were n = 72 patients for group 1, n = 134 patients for group 2, n = 160 patients for group 3, and n = 98 patients for group 4, respectively. Median LiMAx values significantly declined with respect to increasing degree of CLD: (1) 510 µg/h/kg, (2) 390 µg/h/kg, (3) 264 µg/h/kg, and (4) 151 µg/h/kg (p < 0.001). When comparing the diagnostic accuracy of the LiMAx test in detecting patients with presence of cirrhosis (groups 1 and 2 vs. groups 3 and 4), an AUROC of 0.942 was found (cut-off 322 µg/h/kg, sensitivity 86.1%, specificity 91.3%, p < 0.0001). LiMAx was superior to TE and serum biomarkers in predicting patients’ outcome by 90-day mortality (AUROC 0.811, p < 0.001). Enzymatic liver function measured by LiMAx was closely associated with different severity stages of CLD and was a reliable diagnostic and prognostic tool with an accuracy comparable to current standard methods. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6753134/ /pubmed/31537822 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-49746-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Buechter, Matthias
Kersting, Sarah
Gerken, Guido
Kahraman, Alisan
Enzymatic liver function measured by LiMAx – a reliable diagnostic and prognostic tool in chronic liver disease
title Enzymatic liver function measured by LiMAx – a reliable diagnostic and prognostic tool in chronic liver disease
title_full Enzymatic liver function measured by LiMAx – a reliable diagnostic and prognostic tool in chronic liver disease
title_fullStr Enzymatic liver function measured by LiMAx – a reliable diagnostic and prognostic tool in chronic liver disease
title_full_unstemmed Enzymatic liver function measured by LiMAx – a reliable diagnostic and prognostic tool in chronic liver disease
title_short Enzymatic liver function measured by LiMAx – a reliable diagnostic and prognostic tool in chronic liver disease
title_sort enzymatic liver function measured by limax – a reliable diagnostic and prognostic tool in chronic liver disease
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6753134/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31537822
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-49746-1
work_keys_str_mv AT buechtermatthias enzymaticliverfunctionmeasuredbylimaxareliablediagnosticandprognostictoolinchronicliverdisease
AT kerstingsarah enzymaticliverfunctionmeasuredbylimaxareliablediagnosticandprognostictoolinchronicliverdisease
AT gerkenguido enzymaticliverfunctionmeasuredbylimaxareliablediagnosticandprognostictoolinchronicliverdisease
AT kahramanalisan enzymaticliverfunctionmeasuredbylimaxareliablediagnosticandprognostictoolinchronicliverdisease