Cargando…

Working Memory Capacity Limits Memory for Bindings

I propose that the capacity of working memory places a specific limit on the maintenance of temporary bindings. Two experiments support this binding hypothesis: Participants remembered word lists of varying length. When tested on a randomly selected word, their error rates increased with the length...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Oberauer, Klaus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ubiquity Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6753309/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31576379
http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/joc.86
_version_ 1783452876620693504
author Oberauer, Klaus
author_facet Oberauer, Klaus
author_sort Oberauer, Klaus
collection PubMed
description I propose that the capacity of working memory places a specific limit on the maintenance of temporary bindings. Two experiments support this binding hypothesis: Participants remembered word lists of varying length. When tested on a randomly selected word, their error rates increased with the length of the list, reflecting a limited capacity for short-term maintenance. This increase in errors was predominantly due to binding errors: People confused the correct word with other words of the current memory list, but very rarely with words not in the list. The frequencies of response choices were analyzed through two measurement models – one based on the assumption of discrete memory states, one on the assumption of continuous memory strength – that capture memory for items and for bindings in separate parameters. Increasing memory set size impaired binding memory but not item memory, supporting the binding hypothesis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6753309
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Ubiquity Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67533092019-10-01 Working Memory Capacity Limits Memory for Bindings Oberauer, Klaus J Cogn Research Article I propose that the capacity of working memory places a specific limit on the maintenance of temporary bindings. Two experiments support this binding hypothesis: Participants remembered word lists of varying length. When tested on a randomly selected word, their error rates increased with the length of the list, reflecting a limited capacity for short-term maintenance. This increase in errors was predominantly due to binding errors: People confused the correct word with other words of the current memory list, but very rarely with words not in the list. The frequencies of response choices were analyzed through two measurement models – one based on the assumption of discrete memory states, one on the assumption of continuous memory strength – that capture memory for items and for bindings in separate parameters. Increasing memory set size impaired binding memory but not item memory, supporting the binding hypothesis. Ubiquity Press 2019-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6753309/ /pubmed/31576379 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/joc.86 Text en Copyright: © 2019 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research Article
Oberauer, Klaus
Working Memory Capacity Limits Memory for Bindings
title Working Memory Capacity Limits Memory for Bindings
title_full Working Memory Capacity Limits Memory for Bindings
title_fullStr Working Memory Capacity Limits Memory for Bindings
title_full_unstemmed Working Memory Capacity Limits Memory for Bindings
title_short Working Memory Capacity Limits Memory for Bindings
title_sort working memory capacity limits memory for bindings
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6753309/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31576379
http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/joc.86
work_keys_str_mv AT oberauerklaus workingmemorycapacitylimitsmemoryforbindings