Cargando…

Comparison of the clinical efficacy of sonography-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) under local and general anesthesia

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the effect of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) under local infiltration anesthesia (PCNL-LIA) and general anesthesia (PCNL-GA) to treat upper urinary tract calculi on clinical application values. METHODS: Patients were randomly divided into the PCNL-LIA (16...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Xunbao, Ye, Qiongxiang, Liu, Xinguo, Chen, Jinjun, Wang, Zhiyong, Xu, Wanfeng, Zhao, Pengfei, Tao, Baozhou
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6753540/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31291811
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060519859767
_version_ 1783452908858114048
author Wang, Xunbao
Ye, Qiongxiang
Liu, Xinguo
Chen, Jinjun
Wang, Zhiyong
Xu, Wanfeng
Zhao, Pengfei
Tao, Baozhou
author_facet Wang, Xunbao
Ye, Qiongxiang
Liu, Xinguo
Chen, Jinjun
Wang, Zhiyong
Xu, Wanfeng
Zhao, Pengfei
Tao, Baozhou
author_sort Wang, Xunbao
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the effect of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) under local infiltration anesthesia (PCNL-LIA) and general anesthesia (PCNL-GA) to treat upper urinary tract calculi on clinical application values. METHODS: Patients were randomly divided into the PCNL-LIA (16 patients) and PCNL-GA (20 patients) groups. Data on safety, cost, complications, rate of residual calculi, and prognosis were compared. RESULTS: The mean operation time in the PCNL-LIA group was less than that in PCNL-GA group (100±7.7 versus 120±9.0 minutes). The mean length of hospital stay in the PCNL-LIA group was shorter than that in the PCNL-GA group (6.9±0.5 versus 10.5±1.2 days). The rate of patients who required blood transfusion because of blood loss during or after surgery was less in the PCNL-LIN group than in the PCNL-GA group (13% versus 40%). The intervention rate in the PCNL-GA group was higher than that in the PCNL-LIA group. Visual analogue pain scale assessment showed that the PCNL-LIA group showed slightly more pain than the PCNL-GA group. CONCLUSION: PCNL-LIA is safer, faster, and more convenient, and it also provides the benefits of a lower rate of blood loss and complications, lower cost, faster recovery, and shorter hospital stay compared with PCNL-GA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6753540
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67535402019-09-25 Comparison of the clinical efficacy of sonography-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) under local and general anesthesia Wang, Xunbao Ye, Qiongxiang Liu, Xinguo Chen, Jinjun Wang, Zhiyong Xu, Wanfeng Zhao, Pengfei Tao, Baozhou J Int Med Res Clinical Research Reports OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the effect of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) under local infiltration anesthesia (PCNL-LIA) and general anesthesia (PCNL-GA) to treat upper urinary tract calculi on clinical application values. METHODS: Patients were randomly divided into the PCNL-LIA (16 patients) and PCNL-GA (20 patients) groups. Data on safety, cost, complications, rate of residual calculi, and prognosis were compared. RESULTS: The mean operation time in the PCNL-LIA group was less than that in PCNL-GA group (100±7.7 versus 120±9.0 minutes). The mean length of hospital stay in the PCNL-LIA group was shorter than that in the PCNL-GA group (6.9±0.5 versus 10.5±1.2 days). The rate of patients who required blood transfusion because of blood loss during or after surgery was less in the PCNL-LIN group than in the PCNL-GA group (13% versus 40%). The intervention rate in the PCNL-GA group was higher than that in the PCNL-LIA group. Visual analogue pain scale assessment showed that the PCNL-LIA group showed slightly more pain than the PCNL-GA group. CONCLUSION: PCNL-LIA is safer, faster, and more convenient, and it also provides the benefits of a lower rate of blood loss and complications, lower cost, faster recovery, and shorter hospital stay compared with PCNL-GA. SAGE Publications 2019-07-10 2019-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6753540/ /pubmed/31291811 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060519859767 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Clinical Research Reports
Wang, Xunbao
Ye, Qiongxiang
Liu, Xinguo
Chen, Jinjun
Wang, Zhiyong
Xu, Wanfeng
Zhao, Pengfei
Tao, Baozhou
Comparison of the clinical efficacy of sonography-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) under local and general anesthesia
title Comparison of the clinical efficacy of sonography-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) under local and general anesthesia
title_full Comparison of the clinical efficacy of sonography-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) under local and general anesthesia
title_fullStr Comparison of the clinical efficacy of sonography-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) under local and general anesthesia
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the clinical efficacy of sonography-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) under local and general anesthesia
title_short Comparison of the clinical efficacy of sonography-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) under local and general anesthesia
title_sort comparison of the clinical efficacy of sonography-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy (pcnl) under local and general anesthesia
topic Clinical Research Reports
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6753540/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31291811
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060519859767
work_keys_str_mv AT wangxunbao comparisonoftheclinicalefficacyofsonographyguidedpercutaneousnephrolithotomypcnlunderlocalandgeneralanesthesia
AT yeqiongxiang comparisonoftheclinicalefficacyofsonographyguidedpercutaneousnephrolithotomypcnlunderlocalandgeneralanesthesia
AT liuxinguo comparisonoftheclinicalefficacyofsonographyguidedpercutaneousnephrolithotomypcnlunderlocalandgeneralanesthesia
AT chenjinjun comparisonoftheclinicalefficacyofsonographyguidedpercutaneousnephrolithotomypcnlunderlocalandgeneralanesthesia
AT wangzhiyong comparisonoftheclinicalefficacyofsonographyguidedpercutaneousnephrolithotomypcnlunderlocalandgeneralanesthesia
AT xuwanfeng comparisonoftheclinicalefficacyofsonographyguidedpercutaneousnephrolithotomypcnlunderlocalandgeneralanesthesia
AT zhaopengfei comparisonoftheclinicalefficacyofsonographyguidedpercutaneousnephrolithotomypcnlunderlocalandgeneralanesthesia
AT taobaozhou comparisonoftheclinicalefficacyofsonographyguidedpercutaneousnephrolithotomypcnlunderlocalandgeneralanesthesia