Cargando…
Comparison of the clinical efficacy of sonography-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) under local and general anesthesia
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the effect of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) under local infiltration anesthesia (PCNL-LIA) and general anesthesia (PCNL-GA) to treat upper urinary tract calculi on clinical application values. METHODS: Patients were randomly divided into the PCNL-LIA (16...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6753540/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31291811 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060519859767 |
_version_ | 1783452908858114048 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Xunbao Ye, Qiongxiang Liu, Xinguo Chen, Jinjun Wang, Zhiyong Xu, Wanfeng Zhao, Pengfei Tao, Baozhou |
author_facet | Wang, Xunbao Ye, Qiongxiang Liu, Xinguo Chen, Jinjun Wang, Zhiyong Xu, Wanfeng Zhao, Pengfei Tao, Baozhou |
author_sort | Wang, Xunbao |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the effect of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) under local infiltration anesthesia (PCNL-LIA) and general anesthesia (PCNL-GA) to treat upper urinary tract calculi on clinical application values. METHODS: Patients were randomly divided into the PCNL-LIA (16 patients) and PCNL-GA (20 patients) groups. Data on safety, cost, complications, rate of residual calculi, and prognosis were compared. RESULTS: The mean operation time in the PCNL-LIA group was less than that in PCNL-GA group (100±7.7 versus 120±9.0 minutes). The mean length of hospital stay in the PCNL-LIA group was shorter than that in the PCNL-GA group (6.9±0.5 versus 10.5±1.2 days). The rate of patients who required blood transfusion because of blood loss during or after surgery was less in the PCNL-LIN group than in the PCNL-GA group (13% versus 40%). The intervention rate in the PCNL-GA group was higher than that in the PCNL-LIA group. Visual analogue pain scale assessment showed that the PCNL-LIA group showed slightly more pain than the PCNL-GA group. CONCLUSION: PCNL-LIA is safer, faster, and more convenient, and it also provides the benefits of a lower rate of blood loss and complications, lower cost, faster recovery, and shorter hospital stay compared with PCNL-GA. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6753540 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67535402019-09-25 Comparison of the clinical efficacy of sonography-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) under local and general anesthesia Wang, Xunbao Ye, Qiongxiang Liu, Xinguo Chen, Jinjun Wang, Zhiyong Xu, Wanfeng Zhao, Pengfei Tao, Baozhou J Int Med Res Clinical Research Reports OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the effect of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) under local infiltration anesthesia (PCNL-LIA) and general anesthesia (PCNL-GA) to treat upper urinary tract calculi on clinical application values. METHODS: Patients were randomly divided into the PCNL-LIA (16 patients) and PCNL-GA (20 patients) groups. Data on safety, cost, complications, rate of residual calculi, and prognosis were compared. RESULTS: The mean operation time in the PCNL-LIA group was less than that in PCNL-GA group (100±7.7 versus 120±9.0 minutes). The mean length of hospital stay in the PCNL-LIA group was shorter than that in the PCNL-GA group (6.9±0.5 versus 10.5±1.2 days). The rate of patients who required blood transfusion because of blood loss during or after surgery was less in the PCNL-LIN group than in the PCNL-GA group (13% versus 40%). The intervention rate in the PCNL-GA group was higher than that in the PCNL-LIA group. Visual analogue pain scale assessment showed that the PCNL-LIA group showed slightly more pain than the PCNL-GA group. CONCLUSION: PCNL-LIA is safer, faster, and more convenient, and it also provides the benefits of a lower rate of blood loss and complications, lower cost, faster recovery, and shorter hospital stay compared with PCNL-GA. SAGE Publications 2019-07-10 2019-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6753540/ /pubmed/31291811 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060519859767 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Clinical Research Reports Wang, Xunbao Ye, Qiongxiang Liu, Xinguo Chen, Jinjun Wang, Zhiyong Xu, Wanfeng Zhao, Pengfei Tao, Baozhou Comparison of the clinical efficacy of sonography-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) under local and general anesthesia |
title | Comparison of the clinical efficacy of sonography-guided percutaneous
nephrolithotomy (PCNL) under local and general anesthesia |
title_full | Comparison of the clinical efficacy of sonography-guided percutaneous
nephrolithotomy (PCNL) under local and general anesthesia |
title_fullStr | Comparison of the clinical efficacy of sonography-guided percutaneous
nephrolithotomy (PCNL) under local and general anesthesia |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the clinical efficacy of sonography-guided percutaneous
nephrolithotomy (PCNL) under local and general anesthesia |
title_short | Comparison of the clinical efficacy of sonography-guided percutaneous
nephrolithotomy (PCNL) under local and general anesthesia |
title_sort | comparison of the clinical efficacy of sonography-guided percutaneous
nephrolithotomy (pcnl) under local and general anesthesia |
topic | Clinical Research Reports |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6753540/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31291811 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060519859767 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangxunbao comparisonoftheclinicalefficacyofsonographyguidedpercutaneousnephrolithotomypcnlunderlocalandgeneralanesthesia AT yeqiongxiang comparisonoftheclinicalefficacyofsonographyguidedpercutaneousnephrolithotomypcnlunderlocalandgeneralanesthesia AT liuxinguo comparisonoftheclinicalefficacyofsonographyguidedpercutaneousnephrolithotomypcnlunderlocalandgeneralanesthesia AT chenjinjun comparisonoftheclinicalefficacyofsonographyguidedpercutaneousnephrolithotomypcnlunderlocalandgeneralanesthesia AT wangzhiyong comparisonoftheclinicalefficacyofsonographyguidedpercutaneousnephrolithotomypcnlunderlocalandgeneralanesthesia AT xuwanfeng comparisonoftheclinicalefficacyofsonographyguidedpercutaneousnephrolithotomypcnlunderlocalandgeneralanesthesia AT zhaopengfei comparisonoftheclinicalefficacyofsonographyguidedpercutaneousnephrolithotomypcnlunderlocalandgeneralanesthesia AT taobaozhou comparisonoftheclinicalefficacyofsonographyguidedpercutaneousnephrolithotomypcnlunderlocalandgeneralanesthesia |