Cargando…
Comparing 2% lidocaine gel (Dispogel and Cathejell) in cystoscopy
OBJECTIVE: Cystoscopy is a common urologic procedure. Analgesics are often used to reduce any pain associated with this procedure. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy in reducing pain and the cost-effectiveness of two forms of lidocaine gel in patients undergoing cystoscopy. METHOD...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6753556/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31307254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060519858509 |
_version_ | 1783452912736796672 |
---|---|
author | Ucar, Muharrem Oguz, Fatih Gecit, Ilhan Aydogan, Mustafa Said |
author_facet | Ucar, Muharrem Oguz, Fatih Gecit, Ilhan Aydogan, Mustafa Said |
author_sort | Ucar, Muharrem |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Cystoscopy is a common urologic procedure. Analgesics are often used to reduce any pain associated with this procedure. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy in reducing pain and the cost-effectiveness of two forms of lidocaine gel in patients undergoing cystoscopy. METHODS: In this double-blind, randomized clinical trial, 77 male patients who were referred for double J removal, urethral dilatation, or cystoscopy were enrolled. The patients were divided into two groups: Dispogel and Cathejell. All patients received 20 mL of intraurethral lidocaine gel 2% and cystoscopy was performed 5 minutes thereafter. The primary outcome was the pain score (visual analogue scale, VAS) during and 5 minutes after cystoscopy. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between the VAS scores, blood pressure, and pulse rate in the groups in either observation period. No patient required additional anesthetic agents or sedatives for insufficient pain relief. CONCLUSION: The results of this study show that the analgesic efficacy of Dispogel and Cathejell in the treatment of pain during and after elective cystoscopy was the same, but Dispogel was more cost-effective. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6753556 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67535562019-09-25 Comparing 2% lidocaine gel (Dispogel and Cathejell) in cystoscopy Ucar, Muharrem Oguz, Fatih Gecit, Ilhan Aydogan, Mustafa Said J Int Med Res Clinical Research Reports OBJECTIVE: Cystoscopy is a common urologic procedure. Analgesics are often used to reduce any pain associated with this procedure. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy in reducing pain and the cost-effectiveness of two forms of lidocaine gel in patients undergoing cystoscopy. METHODS: In this double-blind, randomized clinical trial, 77 male patients who were referred for double J removal, urethral dilatation, or cystoscopy were enrolled. The patients were divided into two groups: Dispogel and Cathejell. All patients received 20 mL of intraurethral lidocaine gel 2% and cystoscopy was performed 5 minutes thereafter. The primary outcome was the pain score (visual analogue scale, VAS) during and 5 minutes after cystoscopy. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between the VAS scores, blood pressure, and pulse rate in the groups in either observation period. No patient required additional anesthetic agents or sedatives for insufficient pain relief. CONCLUSION: The results of this study show that the analgesic efficacy of Dispogel and Cathejell in the treatment of pain during and after elective cystoscopy was the same, but Dispogel was more cost-effective. SAGE Publications 2019-07-16 2019-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6753556/ /pubmed/31307254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060519858509 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Clinical Research Reports Ucar, Muharrem Oguz, Fatih Gecit, Ilhan Aydogan, Mustafa Said Comparing 2% lidocaine gel (Dispogel and Cathejell) in cystoscopy |
title | Comparing 2% lidocaine gel (Dispogel and Cathejell) in
cystoscopy |
title_full | Comparing 2% lidocaine gel (Dispogel and Cathejell) in
cystoscopy |
title_fullStr | Comparing 2% lidocaine gel (Dispogel and Cathejell) in
cystoscopy |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing 2% lidocaine gel (Dispogel and Cathejell) in
cystoscopy |
title_short | Comparing 2% lidocaine gel (Dispogel and Cathejell) in
cystoscopy |
title_sort | comparing 2% lidocaine gel (dispogel and cathejell) in
cystoscopy |
topic | Clinical Research Reports |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6753556/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31307254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060519858509 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ucarmuharrem comparing2lidocainegeldispogelandcathejellincystoscopy AT oguzfatih comparing2lidocainegeldispogelandcathejellincystoscopy AT gecitilhan comparing2lidocainegeldispogelandcathejellincystoscopy AT aydoganmustafasaid comparing2lidocainegeldispogelandcathejellincystoscopy |