Cargando…

Clinical evaluation of 4D MRI in the delineation of gross and internal tumor volumes in comparison with 4DCT

PURPOSE: To evaluate clinical utility of respiratory‐correlated (RC) four‐dimensional magnetic resonance imaging (4DMRI) for lung tumor delineation and motion assessment, in comparison with the current clinical standard of 4D computed tomography (4DCT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: A prospective T2‐weight...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Jingjing, Srivastava, Shreya, Wang, Chunyu, Beckham, Thomas, Johnson, Christopher, Dutta, Pinaki, Shepherd, Annemarie, Mechalakos, James, Hunt, Margie, Wu, Abraham, Rimner, Andreas, Li, Guang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6753727/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31538719
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12699
_version_ 1783452948955660288
author Zhang, Jingjing
Srivastava, Shreya
Wang, Chunyu
Beckham, Thomas
Johnson, Christopher
Dutta, Pinaki
Shepherd, Annemarie
Mechalakos, James
Hunt, Margie
Wu, Abraham
Rimner, Andreas
Li, Guang
author_facet Zhang, Jingjing
Srivastava, Shreya
Wang, Chunyu
Beckham, Thomas
Johnson, Christopher
Dutta, Pinaki
Shepherd, Annemarie
Mechalakos, James
Hunt, Margie
Wu, Abraham
Rimner, Andreas
Li, Guang
author_sort Zhang, Jingjing
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate clinical utility of respiratory‐correlated (RC) four‐dimensional magnetic resonance imaging (4DMRI) for lung tumor delineation and motion assessment, in comparison with the current clinical standard of 4D computed tomography (4DCT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: A prospective T2‐weighted (T2w) RC‐4DMRI technique was applied to acquire coronal 4DMRI images for 14 lung cancer patients (16 lesions) during free breathing (FB) under an IRB‐approved protocol, together with a breath‐hold (BH) T1w 3DMRI and axial 4DMRI. Clinical simulation CT and 4DCT were acquired within 2 h. An internal navigator was applied to trigger amplitude‐binned 4DMRI acquisition whereas a bellows or real‐time position management (RPM) was used in the 4DCT reconstruction. Six radiation oncologists manually delineated the gross and internal tumor volumes (GTV and ITV) in 399 3D images using programmed clinical workflows under a tumor delineation guideline. The ITV was the union of GTVs within the breathing cycle without margin. Average GTV and motion range were assessed and ITV variation between 4DMRI and 4DCT was evaluated using the Dice similarity index, mean distance agreement (MDA), and volume difference. RESULTS: The mean tumor volume is similar between 4DCT (GTV(4DCT) = 1.0, as the reference) and T2w‐4DMRI (GTV(T2wMR) = 0.97), but smaller in T1w MRI (GTV(T1wMR) = 0.76), suggesting possible peripheral edema around the tumor. Average GTV variation within the breathing cycle (22%) in 4DMRI is slightly greater than 4DCT (17%). GTV motion variation (−4 to 12 mm) and ITV variation (∆V(ITV)=−25 to 95%) between 4DCT and 4DMRI are large, confirmed by relatively low ITV similarity (Dice = 0.72 ± 0.11) and large MDA = 2.9 ± 1.5 mm. CONCLUSION: Average GTVs are similar between T2w‐4DMRI and 4DCT, but smaller by 25% in T1w BH MRI. Physician training and breathing coaching may be necessary to reduce ITV variability between 4DMRI and 4DCT. Four‐dimensional magnetic resonance imaging is a promising and viable technique for clinical lung tumor delineation and motion assessment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6753727
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67537272019-09-23 Clinical evaluation of 4D MRI in the delineation of gross and internal tumor volumes in comparison with 4DCT Zhang, Jingjing Srivastava, Shreya Wang, Chunyu Beckham, Thomas Johnson, Christopher Dutta, Pinaki Shepherd, Annemarie Mechalakos, James Hunt, Margie Wu, Abraham Rimner, Andreas Li, Guang J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: To evaluate clinical utility of respiratory‐correlated (RC) four‐dimensional magnetic resonance imaging (4DMRI) for lung tumor delineation and motion assessment, in comparison with the current clinical standard of 4D computed tomography (4DCT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: A prospective T2‐weighted (T2w) RC‐4DMRI technique was applied to acquire coronal 4DMRI images for 14 lung cancer patients (16 lesions) during free breathing (FB) under an IRB‐approved protocol, together with a breath‐hold (BH) T1w 3DMRI and axial 4DMRI. Clinical simulation CT and 4DCT were acquired within 2 h. An internal navigator was applied to trigger amplitude‐binned 4DMRI acquisition whereas a bellows or real‐time position management (RPM) was used in the 4DCT reconstruction. Six radiation oncologists manually delineated the gross and internal tumor volumes (GTV and ITV) in 399 3D images using programmed clinical workflows under a tumor delineation guideline. The ITV was the union of GTVs within the breathing cycle without margin. Average GTV and motion range were assessed and ITV variation between 4DMRI and 4DCT was evaluated using the Dice similarity index, mean distance agreement (MDA), and volume difference. RESULTS: The mean tumor volume is similar between 4DCT (GTV(4DCT) = 1.0, as the reference) and T2w‐4DMRI (GTV(T2wMR) = 0.97), but smaller in T1w MRI (GTV(T1wMR) = 0.76), suggesting possible peripheral edema around the tumor. Average GTV variation within the breathing cycle (22%) in 4DMRI is slightly greater than 4DCT (17%). GTV motion variation (−4 to 12 mm) and ITV variation (∆V(ITV)=−25 to 95%) between 4DCT and 4DMRI are large, confirmed by relatively low ITV similarity (Dice = 0.72 ± 0.11) and large MDA = 2.9 ± 1.5 mm. CONCLUSION: Average GTVs are similar between T2w‐4DMRI and 4DCT, but smaller by 25% in T1w BH MRI. Physician training and breathing coaching may be necessary to reduce ITV variability between 4DMRI and 4DCT. Four‐dimensional magnetic resonance imaging is a promising and viable technique for clinical lung tumor delineation and motion assessment. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6753727/ /pubmed/31538719 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12699 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Zhang, Jingjing
Srivastava, Shreya
Wang, Chunyu
Beckham, Thomas
Johnson, Christopher
Dutta, Pinaki
Shepherd, Annemarie
Mechalakos, James
Hunt, Margie
Wu, Abraham
Rimner, Andreas
Li, Guang
Clinical evaluation of 4D MRI in the delineation of gross and internal tumor volumes in comparison with 4DCT
title Clinical evaluation of 4D MRI in the delineation of gross and internal tumor volumes in comparison with 4DCT
title_full Clinical evaluation of 4D MRI in the delineation of gross and internal tumor volumes in comparison with 4DCT
title_fullStr Clinical evaluation of 4D MRI in the delineation of gross and internal tumor volumes in comparison with 4DCT
title_full_unstemmed Clinical evaluation of 4D MRI in the delineation of gross and internal tumor volumes in comparison with 4DCT
title_short Clinical evaluation of 4D MRI in the delineation of gross and internal tumor volumes in comparison with 4DCT
title_sort clinical evaluation of 4d mri in the delineation of gross and internal tumor volumes in comparison with 4dct
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6753727/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31538719
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12699
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangjingjing clinicalevaluationof4dmriinthedelineationofgrossandinternaltumorvolumesincomparisonwith4dct
AT srivastavashreya clinicalevaluationof4dmriinthedelineationofgrossandinternaltumorvolumesincomparisonwith4dct
AT wangchunyu clinicalevaluationof4dmriinthedelineationofgrossandinternaltumorvolumesincomparisonwith4dct
AT beckhamthomas clinicalevaluationof4dmriinthedelineationofgrossandinternaltumorvolumesincomparisonwith4dct
AT johnsonchristopher clinicalevaluationof4dmriinthedelineationofgrossandinternaltumorvolumesincomparisonwith4dct
AT duttapinaki clinicalevaluationof4dmriinthedelineationofgrossandinternaltumorvolumesincomparisonwith4dct
AT shepherdannemarie clinicalevaluationof4dmriinthedelineationofgrossandinternaltumorvolumesincomparisonwith4dct
AT mechalakosjames clinicalevaluationof4dmriinthedelineationofgrossandinternaltumorvolumesincomparisonwith4dct
AT huntmargie clinicalevaluationof4dmriinthedelineationofgrossandinternaltumorvolumesincomparisonwith4dct
AT wuabraham clinicalevaluationof4dmriinthedelineationofgrossandinternaltumorvolumesincomparisonwith4dct
AT rimnerandreas clinicalevaluationof4dmriinthedelineationofgrossandinternaltumorvolumesincomparisonwith4dct
AT liguang clinicalevaluationof4dmriinthedelineationofgrossandinternaltumorvolumesincomparisonwith4dct