Cargando…

Comparison of ultrasound-guided versus conventional palpatory method of dorsalis pedis artery cannulation: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Whether use of ultrasound (USG) to cannulate dorsalis pedis artery (DPA) increases first pass successful cannulation, decreases the number of attempts and complications as compared to palpation technique was assessed in this study. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Operating...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anand, Rahul Kumar, Maitra, Souvik, Ray, Bikas Ranjan, Baidhya, Dalim Kumar, Khanna, Puneet, Chowdhury, Sumit Roy, Subramaniam, Rajeshwari
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6753743/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31572072
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sja.SJA_766_18
_version_ 1783452952804982784
author Anand, Rahul Kumar
Maitra, Souvik
Ray, Bikas Ranjan
Baidhya, Dalim Kumar
Khanna, Puneet
Chowdhury, Sumit Roy
Subramaniam, Rajeshwari
author_facet Anand, Rahul Kumar
Maitra, Souvik
Ray, Bikas Ranjan
Baidhya, Dalim Kumar
Khanna, Puneet
Chowdhury, Sumit Roy
Subramaniam, Rajeshwari
author_sort Anand, Rahul Kumar
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Whether use of ultrasound (USG) to cannulate dorsalis pedis artery (DPA) increases first pass successful cannulation, decreases the number of attempts and complications as compared to palpation technique was assessed in this study. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Operating room. PATIENTS: About 60 adult patients undergoing any head–neck or faciomaxillary surgery requiring arterial cannulation were enrolled. INTERVENTION: DPA was cannulated either by USG-guided technique (USG group) or by palpation technique (palpation group) with 30 patients in each group. MEASUREMENT: Data were assessed for “first-attempt success” of cannulation, number of attempts, assessment time, cannulation time, cannulation failure, and incidence of complications. MAIN RESULTS: Successful first pass DPA cannulation was similar between the groups (ultrasound group vs. palpation group, 76.7% vs. 60%, respectively) [relative risk (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.69 (0.43, 1.13), P = 0.267)] as was the number of attempts required for successful cannulation [median (interquartile range (IQR) number of attempts 1 (1–2) in palpation group P and USG group U 1 (1–1); P = 0.376]. Median (IQR) assessment time was significantly less (P < 0.0004) in palpation group [palpation group 12 (9–17) vs. USG group U 19 (15–21)]. However, cannulation time was significantly higher (P = 0.0093) in Group P [median (IQR) 17.5 (12–36 s) and 11.5 (9–15)]. Although the total procedure time (sum of both assessment time and cannulation time) remain statistically similar between two groups (P = 0.8882). CONCLUSIONS: Use of USG for the cannulation of DPA is feasible, but it is not associated with significant increase in first-attempt success rate, decrease in total number of cannulation attempts or total procedure time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6753743
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67537432019-10-01 Comparison of ultrasound-guided versus conventional palpatory method of dorsalis pedis artery cannulation: A randomized controlled trial Anand, Rahul Kumar Maitra, Souvik Ray, Bikas Ranjan Baidhya, Dalim Kumar Khanna, Puneet Chowdhury, Sumit Roy Subramaniam, Rajeshwari Saudi J Anaesth Original Article BACKGROUND: Whether use of ultrasound (USG) to cannulate dorsalis pedis artery (DPA) increases first pass successful cannulation, decreases the number of attempts and complications as compared to palpation technique was assessed in this study. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Operating room. PATIENTS: About 60 adult patients undergoing any head–neck or faciomaxillary surgery requiring arterial cannulation were enrolled. INTERVENTION: DPA was cannulated either by USG-guided technique (USG group) or by palpation technique (palpation group) with 30 patients in each group. MEASUREMENT: Data were assessed for “first-attempt success” of cannulation, number of attempts, assessment time, cannulation time, cannulation failure, and incidence of complications. MAIN RESULTS: Successful first pass DPA cannulation was similar between the groups (ultrasound group vs. palpation group, 76.7% vs. 60%, respectively) [relative risk (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.69 (0.43, 1.13), P = 0.267)] as was the number of attempts required for successful cannulation [median (interquartile range (IQR) number of attempts 1 (1–2) in palpation group P and USG group U 1 (1–1); P = 0.376]. Median (IQR) assessment time was significantly less (P < 0.0004) in palpation group [palpation group 12 (9–17) vs. USG group U 19 (15–21)]. However, cannulation time was significantly higher (P = 0.0093) in Group P [median (IQR) 17.5 (12–36 s) and 11.5 (9–15)]. Although the total procedure time (sum of both assessment time and cannulation time) remain statistically similar between two groups (P = 0.8882). CONCLUSIONS: Use of USG for the cannulation of DPA is feasible, but it is not associated with significant increase in first-attempt success rate, decrease in total number of cannulation attempts or total procedure time. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6753743/ /pubmed/31572072 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sja.SJA_766_18 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Saudi Journal of Anesthesia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Anand, Rahul Kumar
Maitra, Souvik
Ray, Bikas Ranjan
Baidhya, Dalim Kumar
Khanna, Puneet
Chowdhury, Sumit Roy
Subramaniam, Rajeshwari
Comparison of ultrasound-guided versus conventional palpatory method of dorsalis pedis artery cannulation: A randomized controlled trial
title Comparison of ultrasound-guided versus conventional palpatory method of dorsalis pedis artery cannulation: A randomized controlled trial
title_full Comparison of ultrasound-guided versus conventional palpatory method of dorsalis pedis artery cannulation: A randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Comparison of ultrasound-guided versus conventional palpatory method of dorsalis pedis artery cannulation: A randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of ultrasound-guided versus conventional palpatory method of dorsalis pedis artery cannulation: A randomized controlled trial
title_short Comparison of ultrasound-guided versus conventional palpatory method of dorsalis pedis artery cannulation: A randomized controlled trial
title_sort comparison of ultrasound-guided versus conventional palpatory method of dorsalis pedis artery cannulation: a randomized controlled trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6753743/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31572072
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sja.SJA_766_18
work_keys_str_mv AT anandrahulkumar comparisonofultrasoundguidedversusconventionalpalpatorymethodofdorsalispedisarterycannulationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT maitrasouvik comparisonofultrasoundguidedversusconventionalpalpatorymethodofdorsalispedisarterycannulationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT raybikasranjan comparisonofultrasoundguidedversusconventionalpalpatorymethodofdorsalispedisarterycannulationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT baidhyadalimkumar comparisonofultrasoundguidedversusconventionalpalpatorymethodofdorsalispedisarterycannulationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT khannapuneet comparisonofultrasoundguidedversusconventionalpalpatorymethodofdorsalispedisarterycannulationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT chowdhurysumitroy comparisonofultrasoundguidedversusconventionalpalpatorymethodofdorsalispedisarterycannulationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT subramaniamrajeshwari comparisonofultrasoundguidedversusconventionalpalpatorymethodofdorsalispedisarterycannulationarandomizedcontrolledtrial