Cargando…
Effect of using tobacco on taste perception
BACKGROUND: Impaired taste perception has impact on quality of life. Tobacco is a perilous factor that contributes to an impaired taste. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare taste perception among tobacco chewers and nonchewers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty subjects (30 tobacco chewers + 30 nonchewers...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6753787/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31548959 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_457_19 |
_version_ | 1783452960703905792 |
---|---|
author | Kale, Yugandhara S. Vibhute, Nupura Belgaumi, Uzma Kadashetti, Vidya Bommanavar, Sushma Kamate, Wasim |
author_facet | Kale, Yugandhara S. Vibhute, Nupura Belgaumi, Uzma Kadashetti, Vidya Bommanavar, Sushma Kamate, Wasim |
author_sort | Kale, Yugandhara S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Impaired taste perception has impact on quality of life. Tobacco is a perilous factor that contributes to an impaired taste. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare taste perception among tobacco chewers and nonchewers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty subjects (30 tobacco chewers + 30 nonchewers as controls) were enrolled in the study for evaluating taste perception. Taste identification time using four aqueous solutions of basic tastes – sweet, salty, sour, and bitter – was recorded (in seconds) and compared between tobacco chewers and controls. The data were analyzed using Student's t-test and analysis of variance using SPSS 20 version software. RESULTS: A statistically significant increase in taste identification time for salty taste in tobacco chewers (12.32 s) was noted compared with nonchewers (10.21 s) (P = 0.03). The average taste identification time was higher for tobacco chewers than nonchewers for sweet and salty taste. However, the average taste identification time was lower for tobacco chewers than nonchewers for sour and bitter taste. In nonchewers, the average taste identification time was 13.01, 10.21, 8.43, and 7.56 s for sweet, salty, bitter, and sour taste, respectively. In tobacco chewers, the average taste identification time was 15.16, 12.32, 7.75, and 7.04 s for sweet, salty, bitter, and sour taste, respectively. CONCLUSION: The results of the study demonstrated noticeable decrease in taste perception to salty taste among tobacco chewers when compared with tobacco nonchewers. There is a remarkable difference in taste perception to basic tastes among tobacco chewers and controls. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6753787 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67537872019-09-23 Effect of using tobacco on taste perception Kale, Yugandhara S. Vibhute, Nupura Belgaumi, Uzma Kadashetti, Vidya Bommanavar, Sushma Kamate, Wasim J Family Med Prim Care Original Article BACKGROUND: Impaired taste perception has impact on quality of life. Tobacco is a perilous factor that contributes to an impaired taste. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare taste perception among tobacco chewers and nonchewers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty subjects (30 tobacco chewers + 30 nonchewers as controls) were enrolled in the study for evaluating taste perception. Taste identification time using four aqueous solutions of basic tastes – sweet, salty, sour, and bitter – was recorded (in seconds) and compared between tobacco chewers and controls. The data were analyzed using Student's t-test and analysis of variance using SPSS 20 version software. RESULTS: A statistically significant increase in taste identification time for salty taste in tobacco chewers (12.32 s) was noted compared with nonchewers (10.21 s) (P = 0.03). The average taste identification time was higher for tobacco chewers than nonchewers for sweet and salty taste. However, the average taste identification time was lower for tobacco chewers than nonchewers for sour and bitter taste. In nonchewers, the average taste identification time was 13.01, 10.21, 8.43, and 7.56 s for sweet, salty, bitter, and sour taste, respectively. In tobacco chewers, the average taste identification time was 15.16, 12.32, 7.75, and 7.04 s for sweet, salty, bitter, and sour taste, respectively. CONCLUSION: The results of the study demonstrated noticeable decrease in taste perception to salty taste among tobacco chewers when compared with tobacco nonchewers. There is a remarkable difference in taste perception to basic tastes among tobacco chewers and controls. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6753787/ /pubmed/31548959 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_457_19 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kale, Yugandhara S. Vibhute, Nupura Belgaumi, Uzma Kadashetti, Vidya Bommanavar, Sushma Kamate, Wasim Effect of using tobacco on taste perception |
title | Effect of using tobacco on taste perception |
title_full | Effect of using tobacco on taste perception |
title_fullStr | Effect of using tobacco on taste perception |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of using tobacco on taste perception |
title_short | Effect of using tobacco on taste perception |
title_sort | effect of using tobacco on taste perception |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6753787/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31548959 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_457_19 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kaleyugandharas effectofusingtobaccoontasteperception AT vibhutenupura effectofusingtobaccoontasteperception AT belgaumiuzma effectofusingtobaccoontasteperception AT kadashettividya effectofusingtobaccoontasteperception AT bommanavarsushma effectofusingtobaccoontasteperception AT kamatewasim effectofusingtobaccoontasteperception |