Cargando…

Effect of using tobacco on taste perception

BACKGROUND: Impaired taste perception has impact on quality of life. Tobacco is a perilous factor that contributes to an impaired taste. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare taste perception among tobacco chewers and nonchewers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty subjects (30 tobacco chewers + 30 nonchewers...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kale, Yugandhara S., Vibhute, Nupura, Belgaumi, Uzma, Kadashetti, Vidya, Bommanavar, Sushma, Kamate, Wasim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6753787/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31548959
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_457_19
_version_ 1783452960703905792
author Kale, Yugandhara S.
Vibhute, Nupura
Belgaumi, Uzma
Kadashetti, Vidya
Bommanavar, Sushma
Kamate, Wasim
author_facet Kale, Yugandhara S.
Vibhute, Nupura
Belgaumi, Uzma
Kadashetti, Vidya
Bommanavar, Sushma
Kamate, Wasim
author_sort Kale, Yugandhara S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Impaired taste perception has impact on quality of life. Tobacco is a perilous factor that contributes to an impaired taste. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare taste perception among tobacco chewers and nonchewers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty subjects (30 tobacco chewers + 30 nonchewers as controls) were enrolled in the study for evaluating taste perception. Taste identification time using four aqueous solutions of basic tastes – sweet, salty, sour, and bitter – was recorded (in seconds) and compared between tobacco chewers and controls. The data were analyzed using Student's t-test and analysis of variance using SPSS 20 version software. RESULTS: A statistically significant increase in taste identification time for salty taste in tobacco chewers (12.32 s) was noted compared with nonchewers (10.21 s) (P = 0.03). The average taste identification time was higher for tobacco chewers than nonchewers for sweet and salty taste. However, the average taste identification time was lower for tobacco chewers than nonchewers for sour and bitter taste. In nonchewers, the average taste identification time was 13.01, 10.21, 8.43, and 7.56 s for sweet, salty, bitter, and sour taste, respectively. In tobacco chewers, the average taste identification time was 15.16, 12.32, 7.75, and 7.04 s for sweet, salty, bitter, and sour taste, respectively. CONCLUSION: The results of the study demonstrated noticeable decrease in taste perception to salty taste among tobacco chewers when compared with tobacco nonchewers. There is a remarkable difference in taste perception to basic tastes among tobacco chewers and controls.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6753787
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67537872019-09-23 Effect of using tobacco on taste perception Kale, Yugandhara S. Vibhute, Nupura Belgaumi, Uzma Kadashetti, Vidya Bommanavar, Sushma Kamate, Wasim J Family Med Prim Care Original Article BACKGROUND: Impaired taste perception has impact on quality of life. Tobacco is a perilous factor that contributes to an impaired taste. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare taste perception among tobacco chewers and nonchewers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty subjects (30 tobacco chewers + 30 nonchewers as controls) were enrolled in the study for evaluating taste perception. Taste identification time using four aqueous solutions of basic tastes – sweet, salty, sour, and bitter – was recorded (in seconds) and compared between tobacco chewers and controls. The data were analyzed using Student's t-test and analysis of variance using SPSS 20 version software. RESULTS: A statistically significant increase in taste identification time for salty taste in tobacco chewers (12.32 s) was noted compared with nonchewers (10.21 s) (P = 0.03). The average taste identification time was higher for tobacco chewers than nonchewers for sweet and salty taste. However, the average taste identification time was lower for tobacco chewers than nonchewers for sour and bitter taste. In nonchewers, the average taste identification time was 13.01, 10.21, 8.43, and 7.56 s for sweet, salty, bitter, and sour taste, respectively. In tobacco chewers, the average taste identification time was 15.16, 12.32, 7.75, and 7.04 s for sweet, salty, bitter, and sour taste, respectively. CONCLUSION: The results of the study demonstrated noticeable decrease in taste perception to salty taste among tobacco chewers when compared with tobacco nonchewers. There is a remarkable difference in taste perception to basic tastes among tobacco chewers and controls. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6753787/ /pubmed/31548959 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_457_19 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kale, Yugandhara S.
Vibhute, Nupura
Belgaumi, Uzma
Kadashetti, Vidya
Bommanavar, Sushma
Kamate, Wasim
Effect of using tobacco on taste perception
title Effect of using tobacco on taste perception
title_full Effect of using tobacco on taste perception
title_fullStr Effect of using tobacco on taste perception
title_full_unstemmed Effect of using tobacco on taste perception
title_short Effect of using tobacco on taste perception
title_sort effect of using tobacco on taste perception
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6753787/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31548959
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_457_19
work_keys_str_mv AT kaleyugandharas effectofusingtobaccoontasteperception
AT vibhutenupura effectofusingtobaccoontasteperception
AT belgaumiuzma effectofusingtobaccoontasteperception
AT kadashettividya effectofusingtobaccoontasteperception
AT bommanavarsushma effectofusingtobaccoontasteperception
AT kamatewasim effectofusingtobaccoontasteperception