Cargando…

The Effects of Age and Central Field Loss on Head Scanning and Detection at Intersections

PURPOSE: Using a driving simulator, we quantified the effects of age and central field loss (CFL) on head scanning when approaching an intersection and investigated the role of inadequate head scanning in detection failures. METHODS: Participants with CFL (n = 20) and with normal vision (NV; n = 29)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bowers, Alex R., Bronstad, P. Matthew, Spano, Lauren P., Goldstein, Robert B., Peli, Eli
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6753881/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31588377
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.8.5.14
_version_ 1783452981718417408
author Bowers, Alex R.
Bronstad, P. Matthew
Spano, Lauren P.
Goldstein, Robert B.
Peli, Eli
author_facet Bowers, Alex R.
Bronstad, P. Matthew
Spano, Lauren P.
Goldstein, Robert B.
Peli, Eli
author_sort Bowers, Alex R.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Using a driving simulator, we quantified the effects of age and central field loss (CFL) on head scanning when approaching an intersection and investigated the role of inadequate head scanning in detection failures. METHODS: Participants with CFL (n = 20) and with normal vision (NV; n = 29), middle-aged (36–60 years) or older (67–87 years), drove along city routes with multiple intersections while head movements were recorded. The effects of age and CFL on scanning were analyzed at 32 intersections with stop/yield signs. The relationships between age, CFL, scanning, and detection were examined at four additional intersections with a pedestrian appearing on the far left. RESULTS: Older NV participants made fewer total scans than middle-aged NV participants and had smaller maximum scan magnitudes. Head scanning of older CFL and NV participants did not differ, but middle-aged CFL participants made fewer head scans, had higher rates of failing to scan, and made smaller head scans than middle-aged NV participants. For the older NV and both CFL groups, detection failures were high (≥58%); head scan magnitudes were 15° smaller when the pedestrian was not detected than when it was detected. CONCLUSIONS: Both older NV and CFL participants exhibited head scanning deficits relative to middle-aged NV participants. Unexpectedly, however, it was the middle-aged CFL group that performed least well when scanning, a finding that warrants further investigation. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: Failing to head scan sufficiently far at intersections may place older drivers and drivers with vision impairment at a higher risk for causing collisions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6753881
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67538812019-10-06 The Effects of Age and Central Field Loss on Head Scanning and Detection at Intersections Bowers, Alex R. Bronstad, P. Matthew Spano, Lauren P. Goldstein, Robert B. Peli, Eli Transl Vis Sci Technol Articles PURPOSE: Using a driving simulator, we quantified the effects of age and central field loss (CFL) on head scanning when approaching an intersection and investigated the role of inadequate head scanning in detection failures. METHODS: Participants with CFL (n = 20) and with normal vision (NV; n = 29), middle-aged (36–60 years) or older (67–87 years), drove along city routes with multiple intersections while head movements were recorded. The effects of age and CFL on scanning were analyzed at 32 intersections with stop/yield signs. The relationships between age, CFL, scanning, and detection were examined at four additional intersections with a pedestrian appearing on the far left. RESULTS: Older NV participants made fewer total scans than middle-aged NV participants and had smaller maximum scan magnitudes. Head scanning of older CFL and NV participants did not differ, but middle-aged CFL participants made fewer head scans, had higher rates of failing to scan, and made smaller head scans than middle-aged NV participants. For the older NV and both CFL groups, detection failures were high (≥58%); head scan magnitudes were 15° smaller when the pedestrian was not detected than when it was detected. CONCLUSIONS: Both older NV and CFL participants exhibited head scanning deficits relative to middle-aged NV participants. Unexpectedly, however, it was the middle-aged CFL group that performed least well when scanning, a finding that warrants further investigation. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: Failing to head scan sufficiently far at intersections may place older drivers and drivers with vision impairment at a higher risk for causing collisions. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2019-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6753881/ /pubmed/31588377 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.8.5.14 Text en Copyright 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Articles
Bowers, Alex R.
Bronstad, P. Matthew
Spano, Lauren P.
Goldstein, Robert B.
Peli, Eli
The Effects of Age and Central Field Loss on Head Scanning and Detection at Intersections
title The Effects of Age and Central Field Loss on Head Scanning and Detection at Intersections
title_full The Effects of Age and Central Field Loss on Head Scanning and Detection at Intersections
title_fullStr The Effects of Age and Central Field Loss on Head Scanning and Detection at Intersections
title_full_unstemmed The Effects of Age and Central Field Loss on Head Scanning and Detection at Intersections
title_short The Effects of Age and Central Field Loss on Head Scanning and Detection at Intersections
title_sort effects of age and central field loss on head scanning and detection at intersections
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6753881/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31588377
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.8.5.14
work_keys_str_mv AT bowersalexr theeffectsofageandcentralfieldlossonheadscanninganddetectionatintersections
AT bronstadpmatthew theeffectsofageandcentralfieldlossonheadscanninganddetectionatintersections
AT spanolaurenp theeffectsofageandcentralfieldlossonheadscanninganddetectionatintersections
AT goldsteinrobertb theeffectsofageandcentralfieldlossonheadscanninganddetectionatintersections
AT pelieli theeffectsofageandcentralfieldlossonheadscanninganddetectionatintersections
AT bowersalexr effectsofageandcentralfieldlossonheadscanninganddetectionatintersections
AT bronstadpmatthew effectsofageandcentralfieldlossonheadscanninganddetectionatintersections
AT spanolaurenp effectsofageandcentralfieldlossonheadscanninganddetectionatintersections
AT goldsteinrobertb effectsofageandcentralfieldlossonheadscanninganddetectionatintersections
AT pelieli effectsofageandcentralfieldlossonheadscanninganddetectionatintersections