Cargando…

Validation of Optical Coherence Tomography Retinal Segmentation in Neurodegenerative Disease

PURPOSE: This study assessed agreement between an automated spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) retinal segmentation software and manually corrected segmentation to validate its use in a prospective clinical study of neurodegenerative diseases (NDD). METHODS: The sample comprised 3...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wong, Bryan M., Cheng, Richard W., Mandelcorn, Efrem D., Margolin, Edward, El-Defrawy, Sherif, Yan, Peng, Santiago, Anna T., Leontieva, Elena, Lou, Wendy, Hatch, Wendy, Hudson, Christopher
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6753973/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31588371
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.8.5.6
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: This study assessed agreement between an automated spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) retinal segmentation software and manually corrected segmentation to validate its use in a prospective clinical study of neurodegenerative diseases (NDD). METHODS: The sample comprised 30 subjects with NDD, including vascular cognitive impairment, frontotemporal dementia, Parkinson's disease, and Alzheimer's disease. Macular SD-OCT scans were acquired and segmented using Heidelberg Spectralis. For the central foveal B scan of each eye, eight segmentation lines were examined to determine the proportion of each line that the software erroneously delineated. Errors in four lines were manually corrected in all B scans spanning a 6-mm circle centered on the foveola. Mean volume and thickness measurements for four retinal layers (total retina, retinal nerve fiber layer [RNFL], inner retinal layers, and outer retinal layers) were obtained before and after correction. RESULTS: The outer plexiform layer line had one of the lowest mean error ratios (2%), while RNFL had the highest (23%). Agreement between automated software and trained observer was excellent (ICC > 0.98) for retinal thickness and volume of all layers. Mean volume differences between software and observers for the four layers ranged from −0.003 to 0.006 mm(3). Mean thickness differences ranged from −1.855 to 1.859 μm. CONCLUSIONS: Despite occasional small errors in software-generated retinal sublayer segmentation, agreement was excellent between software-derived and observer-corrected mean volume and thickness sublayer measurements. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: Automated SD-OCT segmentation software generates valid measurements of retinal layer volume and thickness in NDD subjects, thereby avoiding the need to manually correct nonobvious delineation errors.