Cargando…

Conventional and/or laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: what is the current evidence?

Despite many years of experience with laparoscopic procedures in rectal cancer, the superiority of minimally invasive approaches has been questioned especially in recent years. This article is a short review of the current knowledge about laparoscopic approaches in comparison to conventional modalit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mik, Michal, Dziki, Lukasz, Dziki, Adam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: De Gruyter 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6753985/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31579714
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/iss-2016-0006
_version_ 1783452998855294976
author Mik, Michal
Dziki, Lukasz
Dziki, Adam
author_facet Mik, Michal
Dziki, Lukasz
Dziki, Adam
author_sort Mik, Michal
collection PubMed
description Despite many years of experience with laparoscopic procedures in rectal cancer, the superiority of minimally invasive approaches has been questioned especially in recent years. This article is a short review of the current knowledge about laparoscopic approaches in comparison to conventional modalities in patients with rectal cancer. To present the current state of the knowledge, we focused on reports that were published in the last few years and compared them to multicenter trials and meta-analyses published last year. Our analysis mainly applied to the primary end-points of these trials. We also included expert opinions that have been published in the last several months.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6753985
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher De Gruyter
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67539852019-10-02 Conventional and/or laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: what is the current evidence? Mik, Michal Dziki, Lukasz Dziki, Adam Innov Surg Sci Reviews Despite many years of experience with laparoscopic procedures in rectal cancer, the superiority of minimally invasive approaches has been questioned especially in recent years. This article is a short review of the current knowledge about laparoscopic approaches in comparison to conventional modalities in patients with rectal cancer. To present the current state of the knowledge, we focused on reports that were published in the last few years and compared them to multicenter trials and meta-analyses published last year. Our analysis mainly applied to the primary end-points of these trials. We also included expert opinions that have been published in the last several months. De Gruyter 2016-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6753985/ /pubmed/31579714 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/iss-2016-0006 Text en ©2016 Michal Mik et al., published by De Gruyter. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
spellingShingle Reviews
Mik, Michal
Dziki, Lukasz
Dziki, Adam
Conventional and/or laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: what is the current evidence?
title Conventional and/or laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: what is the current evidence?
title_full Conventional and/or laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: what is the current evidence?
title_fullStr Conventional and/or laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: what is the current evidence?
title_full_unstemmed Conventional and/or laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: what is the current evidence?
title_short Conventional and/or laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: what is the current evidence?
title_sort conventional and/or laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: what is the current evidence?
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6753985/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31579714
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/iss-2016-0006
work_keys_str_mv AT mikmichal conventionalandorlaparoscopicrectalcancersurgerywhatisthecurrentevidence
AT dzikilukasz conventionalandorlaparoscopicrectalcancersurgerywhatisthecurrentevidence
AT dzikiadam conventionalandorlaparoscopicrectalcancersurgerywhatisthecurrentevidence