Cargando…
The injection or the injection? Restricted contraceptive choices among women living with HIV
Historically, women living with HIV (WLWH) have been vulnerable to biased advice from healthcare workers regarding contraception and childbearing. However, antiretroviral therapy (ART) has made motherhood safer, prompting a re-examination of whether contraceptive services enable the realisation of W...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6754114/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31533578 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2019.1628593 |
_version_ | 1783453023980224512 |
---|---|
author | Towriss, Catriona A. Phillips, Tamsin K. Brittain, Kirsty Zerbe, Allison Abrams, Elaine J. Myer, Landon |
author_facet | Towriss, Catriona A. Phillips, Tamsin K. Brittain, Kirsty Zerbe, Allison Abrams, Elaine J. Myer, Landon |
author_sort | Towriss, Catriona A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Historically, women living with HIV (WLWH) have been vulnerable to biased advice from healthcare workers regarding contraception and childbearing. However, antiretroviral therapy (ART) has made motherhood safer, prompting a re-examination of whether contraceptive services enable the realisation of WLWH’s reproductive intentions. We use longitudinal quantitative data on contraceptive choice and use, and childbearing intentions collected in (up to) six interviews between entry into antenatal care (ANC) and 18 months post-partum from a cohort of 471 ART-initiated WLWH in Cape Town, South Africa. Thirty-nine of these women were randomly selected for in-depth interview where they described experiences of contraception services and use. We find high prevalence of injectable contraceptive (IC) use after birth (74%). With increasing post-partum duration, greater proportions of women discontinue this method (at 18 months 21% were not using contraception), while desires for another child remain stable. We find little consistency between method choice and use: many women who elected to use the intrauterine device, sterilisation or oral contraceptives at first ANC visit are using IC after birth. Women commonly report receiving an IC shortly after birth, including those who had previously chosen to use another method or no method. Among WLWH, injectables dominated the contraceptive method mix. Despite a human rights-grounded policy and attempts to introduce new methods, contraceptive services in South Africa remain largely unchanged over time. Women are frequently unable to make autonomous contraceptive choices. Despite low desires for future pregnancy, we observed high rates of contraceptive discontinuation, resulting in heightened risk of unintended pregnancy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6754114 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67541142019-12-01 The injection or the injection? Restricted contraceptive choices among women living with HIV Towriss, Catriona A. Phillips, Tamsin K. Brittain, Kirsty Zerbe, Allison Abrams, Elaine J. Myer, Landon Sex Reprod Health Matters Research Articles Historically, women living with HIV (WLWH) have been vulnerable to biased advice from healthcare workers regarding contraception and childbearing. However, antiretroviral therapy (ART) has made motherhood safer, prompting a re-examination of whether contraceptive services enable the realisation of WLWH’s reproductive intentions. We use longitudinal quantitative data on contraceptive choice and use, and childbearing intentions collected in (up to) six interviews between entry into antenatal care (ANC) and 18 months post-partum from a cohort of 471 ART-initiated WLWH in Cape Town, South Africa. Thirty-nine of these women were randomly selected for in-depth interview where they described experiences of contraception services and use. We find high prevalence of injectable contraceptive (IC) use after birth (74%). With increasing post-partum duration, greater proportions of women discontinue this method (at 18 months 21% were not using contraception), while desires for another child remain stable. We find little consistency between method choice and use: many women who elected to use the intrauterine device, sterilisation or oral contraceptives at first ANC visit are using IC after birth. Women commonly report receiving an IC shortly after birth, including those who had previously chosen to use another method or no method. Among WLWH, injectables dominated the contraceptive method mix. Despite a human rights-grounded policy and attempts to introduce new methods, contraceptive services in South Africa remain largely unchanged over time. Women are frequently unable to make autonomous contraceptive choices. Despite low desires for future pregnancy, we observed high rates of contraceptive discontinuation, resulting in heightened risk of unintended pregnancy. Taylor & Francis 2019-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6754114/ /pubmed/31533578 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2019.1628593 Text en © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Towriss, Catriona A. Phillips, Tamsin K. Brittain, Kirsty Zerbe, Allison Abrams, Elaine J. Myer, Landon The injection or the injection? Restricted contraceptive choices among women living with HIV |
title | The injection or the injection? Restricted contraceptive choices among women living with HIV |
title_full | The injection or the injection? Restricted contraceptive choices among women living with HIV |
title_fullStr | The injection or the injection? Restricted contraceptive choices among women living with HIV |
title_full_unstemmed | The injection or the injection? Restricted contraceptive choices among women living with HIV |
title_short | The injection or the injection? Restricted contraceptive choices among women living with HIV |
title_sort | injection or the injection? restricted contraceptive choices among women living with hiv |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6754114/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31533578 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2019.1628593 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT towrisscatrionaa theinjectionortheinjectionrestrictedcontraceptivechoicesamongwomenlivingwithhiv AT phillipstamsink theinjectionortheinjectionrestrictedcontraceptivechoicesamongwomenlivingwithhiv AT brittainkirsty theinjectionortheinjectionrestrictedcontraceptivechoicesamongwomenlivingwithhiv AT zerbeallison theinjectionortheinjectionrestrictedcontraceptivechoicesamongwomenlivingwithhiv AT abramselainej theinjectionortheinjectionrestrictedcontraceptivechoicesamongwomenlivingwithhiv AT myerlandon theinjectionortheinjectionrestrictedcontraceptivechoicesamongwomenlivingwithhiv AT towrisscatrionaa injectionortheinjectionrestrictedcontraceptivechoicesamongwomenlivingwithhiv AT phillipstamsink injectionortheinjectionrestrictedcontraceptivechoicesamongwomenlivingwithhiv AT brittainkirsty injectionortheinjectionrestrictedcontraceptivechoicesamongwomenlivingwithhiv AT zerbeallison injectionortheinjectionrestrictedcontraceptivechoicesamongwomenlivingwithhiv AT abramselainej injectionortheinjectionrestrictedcontraceptivechoicesamongwomenlivingwithhiv AT myerlandon injectionortheinjectionrestrictedcontraceptivechoicesamongwomenlivingwithhiv |