Cargando…

The injection or the injection? Restricted contraceptive choices among women living with HIV

Historically, women living with HIV (WLWH) have been vulnerable to biased advice from healthcare workers regarding contraception and childbearing. However, antiretroviral therapy (ART) has made motherhood safer, prompting a re-examination of whether contraceptive services enable the realisation of W...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Towriss, Catriona A., Phillips, Tamsin K., Brittain, Kirsty, Zerbe, Allison, Abrams, Elaine J., Myer, Landon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6754114/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31533578
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2019.1628593
_version_ 1783453023980224512
author Towriss, Catriona A.
Phillips, Tamsin K.
Brittain, Kirsty
Zerbe, Allison
Abrams, Elaine J.
Myer, Landon
author_facet Towriss, Catriona A.
Phillips, Tamsin K.
Brittain, Kirsty
Zerbe, Allison
Abrams, Elaine J.
Myer, Landon
author_sort Towriss, Catriona A.
collection PubMed
description Historically, women living with HIV (WLWH) have been vulnerable to biased advice from healthcare workers regarding contraception and childbearing. However, antiretroviral therapy (ART) has made motherhood safer, prompting a re-examination of whether contraceptive services enable the realisation of WLWH’s reproductive intentions. We use longitudinal quantitative data on contraceptive choice and use, and childbearing intentions collected in (up to) six interviews between entry into antenatal care (ANC) and 18 months post-partum from a cohort of 471 ART-initiated WLWH in Cape Town, South Africa. Thirty-nine of these women were randomly selected for in-depth interview where they described experiences of contraception services and use. We find high prevalence of injectable contraceptive (IC) use after birth (74%). With increasing post-partum duration, greater proportions of women discontinue this method (at 18 months 21% were not using contraception), while desires for another child remain stable. We find little consistency between method choice and use: many women who elected to use the intrauterine device, sterilisation or oral contraceptives at first ANC visit are using IC after birth. Women commonly report receiving an IC shortly after birth, including those who had previously chosen to use another method or no method. Among WLWH, injectables dominated the contraceptive method mix. Despite a human rights-grounded policy and attempts to introduce new methods, contraceptive services in South Africa remain largely unchanged over time. Women are frequently unable to make autonomous contraceptive choices. Despite low desires for future pregnancy, we observed high rates of contraceptive discontinuation, resulting in heightened risk of unintended pregnancy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6754114
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67541142019-12-01 The injection or the injection? Restricted contraceptive choices among women living with HIV Towriss, Catriona A. Phillips, Tamsin K. Brittain, Kirsty Zerbe, Allison Abrams, Elaine J. Myer, Landon Sex Reprod Health Matters Research Articles Historically, women living with HIV (WLWH) have been vulnerable to biased advice from healthcare workers regarding contraception and childbearing. However, antiretroviral therapy (ART) has made motherhood safer, prompting a re-examination of whether contraceptive services enable the realisation of WLWH’s reproductive intentions. We use longitudinal quantitative data on contraceptive choice and use, and childbearing intentions collected in (up to) six interviews between entry into antenatal care (ANC) and 18 months post-partum from a cohort of 471 ART-initiated WLWH in Cape Town, South Africa. Thirty-nine of these women were randomly selected for in-depth interview where they described experiences of contraception services and use. We find high prevalence of injectable contraceptive (IC) use after birth (74%). With increasing post-partum duration, greater proportions of women discontinue this method (at 18 months 21% were not using contraception), while desires for another child remain stable. We find little consistency between method choice and use: many women who elected to use the intrauterine device, sterilisation or oral contraceptives at first ANC visit are using IC after birth. Women commonly report receiving an IC shortly after birth, including those who had previously chosen to use another method or no method. Among WLWH, injectables dominated the contraceptive method mix. Despite a human rights-grounded policy and attempts to introduce new methods, contraceptive services in South Africa remain largely unchanged over time. Women are frequently unable to make autonomous contraceptive choices. Despite low desires for future pregnancy, we observed high rates of contraceptive discontinuation, resulting in heightened risk of unintended pregnancy. Taylor & Francis 2019-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6754114/ /pubmed/31533578 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2019.1628593 Text en © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Research Articles
Towriss, Catriona A.
Phillips, Tamsin K.
Brittain, Kirsty
Zerbe, Allison
Abrams, Elaine J.
Myer, Landon
The injection or the injection? Restricted contraceptive choices among women living with HIV
title The injection or the injection? Restricted contraceptive choices among women living with HIV
title_full The injection or the injection? Restricted contraceptive choices among women living with HIV
title_fullStr The injection or the injection? Restricted contraceptive choices among women living with HIV
title_full_unstemmed The injection or the injection? Restricted contraceptive choices among women living with HIV
title_short The injection or the injection? Restricted contraceptive choices among women living with HIV
title_sort injection or the injection? restricted contraceptive choices among women living with hiv
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6754114/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31533578
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2019.1628593
work_keys_str_mv AT towrisscatrionaa theinjectionortheinjectionrestrictedcontraceptivechoicesamongwomenlivingwithhiv
AT phillipstamsink theinjectionortheinjectionrestrictedcontraceptivechoicesamongwomenlivingwithhiv
AT brittainkirsty theinjectionortheinjectionrestrictedcontraceptivechoicesamongwomenlivingwithhiv
AT zerbeallison theinjectionortheinjectionrestrictedcontraceptivechoicesamongwomenlivingwithhiv
AT abramselainej theinjectionortheinjectionrestrictedcontraceptivechoicesamongwomenlivingwithhiv
AT myerlandon theinjectionortheinjectionrestrictedcontraceptivechoicesamongwomenlivingwithhiv
AT towrisscatrionaa injectionortheinjectionrestrictedcontraceptivechoicesamongwomenlivingwithhiv
AT phillipstamsink injectionortheinjectionrestrictedcontraceptivechoicesamongwomenlivingwithhiv
AT brittainkirsty injectionortheinjectionrestrictedcontraceptivechoicesamongwomenlivingwithhiv
AT zerbeallison injectionortheinjectionrestrictedcontraceptivechoicesamongwomenlivingwithhiv
AT abramselainej injectionortheinjectionrestrictedcontraceptivechoicesamongwomenlivingwithhiv
AT myerlandon injectionortheinjectionrestrictedcontraceptivechoicesamongwomenlivingwithhiv