Cargando…

Concurrent Proximal Fractures Are Rare in Distal Forearm Fractures: A National Cross-sectional Study

INTRODUCTION: Distal forearm fractures (DFF) account for 1.5% of emergency department (ED) visits in the United States. Clinicians frequently obtain imaging above/below the location of injury to rule out additional injuries. We sought to determine the incidence of associated proximal fractures (APF)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Negaard, Matthew, Vakkalanka, Priyanka, Whipple, M. Terese, Hogrefe, Christopher, Swanson, Morgan B., Harland, Karisa K., Mathiasen, Ross, Van Heukelom, Jon, Thomsen, Timothy W., Mohr, Nicholas M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6754191/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31539332
http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2019.5.42952
_version_ 1783453038015414272
author Negaard, Matthew
Vakkalanka, Priyanka
Whipple, M. Terese
Hogrefe, Christopher
Swanson, Morgan B.
Harland, Karisa K.
Mathiasen, Ross
Van Heukelom, Jon
Thomsen, Timothy W.
Mohr, Nicholas M.
author_facet Negaard, Matthew
Vakkalanka, Priyanka
Whipple, M. Terese
Hogrefe, Christopher
Swanson, Morgan B.
Harland, Karisa K.
Mathiasen, Ross
Van Heukelom, Jon
Thomsen, Timothy W.
Mohr, Nicholas M.
author_sort Negaard, Matthew
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Distal forearm fractures (DFF) account for 1.5% of emergency department (ED) visits in the United States. Clinicians frequently obtain imaging above/below the location of injury to rule out additional injuries. We sought to determine the incidence of associated proximal fractures (APF) in the setting of DFF and to evaluate the imaging practices in a nationally representative sample of EDs. METHODS: We queried the 2013 National Emergency Department Sample using International Classification of Diseases, 9th edition, diagnostic codes for DFF and APF. Current Procedural Technology codes identified associated imaging studies. We calculated national estimates using a weighted analysis of patient and hospital-level characteristics associated with APF and imaging practices. An analysis of costs estimated the financial impact of additional imaging in patients with DFF using Medicare reimbursement to approximate costs according to the 2018 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule. RESULTS: In 2013, an estimated 297,755 ED visits (weighted) were associated with a DFF, of which 1.6% (4836 cases) had an APF. The incidence of APF was lower among females (odds ratio [OR] (0.76); 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64–0.91) but higher in metropolitan teaching hospitals compared to metropolitan non-teaching hospitals (OR [2.39]; 95% CI, 1.43–3.99) and Level 1 trauma centers (OR [3.9]; 95%, 1.91–7.96) compared to non-trauma centers. Approximately 40% (n = 117,948) of those with only DFF received non-wrist radiographs and 19% (n = 55,236) underwent non-wrist/non-forearm imaging. Factors independently associated with additional imaging included gender, payer, patient and hospital rurality, hospital region, teaching status, ownership, and trauma center level. Nearly $3.6 million (2018 U.S. dollars) was spent on the aforementioned additional imaging. CONCLUSION: Despite the frequency of proximal imaging in patients with DFF, the incidence of APF was low. Further study to identify risk factors for APF based on mechanism and physical examination factors may result in reduced imaging and decreased avoidable healthcare spending.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6754191
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67541912019-09-25 Concurrent Proximal Fractures Are Rare in Distal Forearm Fractures: A National Cross-sectional Study Negaard, Matthew Vakkalanka, Priyanka Whipple, M. Terese Hogrefe, Christopher Swanson, Morgan B. Harland, Karisa K. Mathiasen, Ross Van Heukelom, Jon Thomsen, Timothy W. Mohr, Nicholas M. West J Emerg Med Trauma INTRODUCTION: Distal forearm fractures (DFF) account for 1.5% of emergency department (ED) visits in the United States. Clinicians frequently obtain imaging above/below the location of injury to rule out additional injuries. We sought to determine the incidence of associated proximal fractures (APF) in the setting of DFF and to evaluate the imaging practices in a nationally representative sample of EDs. METHODS: We queried the 2013 National Emergency Department Sample using International Classification of Diseases, 9th edition, diagnostic codes for DFF and APF. Current Procedural Technology codes identified associated imaging studies. We calculated national estimates using a weighted analysis of patient and hospital-level characteristics associated with APF and imaging practices. An analysis of costs estimated the financial impact of additional imaging in patients with DFF using Medicare reimbursement to approximate costs according to the 2018 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule. RESULTS: In 2013, an estimated 297,755 ED visits (weighted) were associated with a DFF, of which 1.6% (4836 cases) had an APF. The incidence of APF was lower among females (odds ratio [OR] (0.76); 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64–0.91) but higher in metropolitan teaching hospitals compared to metropolitan non-teaching hospitals (OR [2.39]; 95% CI, 1.43–3.99) and Level 1 trauma centers (OR [3.9]; 95%, 1.91–7.96) compared to non-trauma centers. Approximately 40% (n = 117,948) of those with only DFF received non-wrist radiographs and 19% (n = 55,236) underwent non-wrist/non-forearm imaging. Factors independently associated with additional imaging included gender, payer, patient and hospital rurality, hospital region, teaching status, ownership, and trauma center level. Nearly $3.6 million (2018 U.S. dollars) was spent on the aforementioned additional imaging. CONCLUSION: Despite the frequency of proximal imaging in patients with DFF, the incidence of APF was low. Further study to identify risk factors for APF based on mechanism and physical examination factors may result in reduced imaging and decreased avoidable healthcare spending. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine 2019-09 2019-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6754191/ /pubmed/31539332 http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2019.5.42952 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Negaard et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Trauma
Negaard, Matthew
Vakkalanka, Priyanka
Whipple, M. Terese
Hogrefe, Christopher
Swanson, Morgan B.
Harland, Karisa K.
Mathiasen, Ross
Van Heukelom, Jon
Thomsen, Timothy W.
Mohr, Nicholas M.
Concurrent Proximal Fractures Are Rare in Distal Forearm Fractures: A National Cross-sectional Study
title Concurrent Proximal Fractures Are Rare in Distal Forearm Fractures: A National Cross-sectional Study
title_full Concurrent Proximal Fractures Are Rare in Distal Forearm Fractures: A National Cross-sectional Study
title_fullStr Concurrent Proximal Fractures Are Rare in Distal Forearm Fractures: A National Cross-sectional Study
title_full_unstemmed Concurrent Proximal Fractures Are Rare in Distal Forearm Fractures: A National Cross-sectional Study
title_short Concurrent Proximal Fractures Are Rare in Distal Forearm Fractures: A National Cross-sectional Study
title_sort concurrent proximal fractures are rare in distal forearm fractures: a national cross-sectional study
topic Trauma
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6754191/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31539332
http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2019.5.42952
work_keys_str_mv AT negaardmatthew concurrentproximalfracturesarerareindistalforearmfracturesanationalcrosssectionalstudy
AT vakkalankapriyanka concurrentproximalfracturesarerareindistalforearmfracturesanationalcrosssectionalstudy
AT whipplemterese concurrentproximalfracturesarerareindistalforearmfracturesanationalcrosssectionalstudy
AT hogrefechristopher concurrentproximalfracturesarerareindistalforearmfracturesanationalcrosssectionalstudy
AT swansonmorganb concurrentproximalfracturesarerareindistalforearmfracturesanationalcrosssectionalstudy
AT harlandkarisak concurrentproximalfracturesarerareindistalforearmfracturesanationalcrosssectionalstudy
AT mathiasenross concurrentproximalfracturesarerareindistalforearmfracturesanationalcrosssectionalstudy
AT vanheukelomjon concurrentproximalfracturesarerareindistalforearmfracturesanationalcrosssectionalstudy
AT thomsentimothyw concurrentproximalfracturesarerareindistalforearmfracturesanationalcrosssectionalstudy
AT mohrnicholasm concurrentproximalfracturesarerareindistalforearmfracturesanationalcrosssectionalstudy