Cargando…
Concurrent Proximal Fractures Are Rare in Distal Forearm Fractures: A National Cross-sectional Study
INTRODUCTION: Distal forearm fractures (DFF) account for 1.5% of emergency department (ED) visits in the United States. Clinicians frequently obtain imaging above/below the location of injury to rule out additional injuries. We sought to determine the incidence of associated proximal fractures (APF)...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6754191/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31539332 http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2019.5.42952 |
_version_ | 1783453038015414272 |
---|---|
author | Negaard, Matthew Vakkalanka, Priyanka Whipple, M. Terese Hogrefe, Christopher Swanson, Morgan B. Harland, Karisa K. Mathiasen, Ross Van Heukelom, Jon Thomsen, Timothy W. Mohr, Nicholas M. |
author_facet | Negaard, Matthew Vakkalanka, Priyanka Whipple, M. Terese Hogrefe, Christopher Swanson, Morgan B. Harland, Karisa K. Mathiasen, Ross Van Heukelom, Jon Thomsen, Timothy W. Mohr, Nicholas M. |
author_sort | Negaard, Matthew |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Distal forearm fractures (DFF) account for 1.5% of emergency department (ED) visits in the United States. Clinicians frequently obtain imaging above/below the location of injury to rule out additional injuries. We sought to determine the incidence of associated proximal fractures (APF) in the setting of DFF and to evaluate the imaging practices in a nationally representative sample of EDs. METHODS: We queried the 2013 National Emergency Department Sample using International Classification of Diseases, 9th edition, diagnostic codes for DFF and APF. Current Procedural Technology codes identified associated imaging studies. We calculated national estimates using a weighted analysis of patient and hospital-level characteristics associated with APF and imaging practices. An analysis of costs estimated the financial impact of additional imaging in patients with DFF using Medicare reimbursement to approximate costs according to the 2018 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule. RESULTS: In 2013, an estimated 297,755 ED visits (weighted) were associated with a DFF, of which 1.6% (4836 cases) had an APF. The incidence of APF was lower among females (odds ratio [OR] (0.76); 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64–0.91) but higher in metropolitan teaching hospitals compared to metropolitan non-teaching hospitals (OR [2.39]; 95% CI, 1.43–3.99) and Level 1 trauma centers (OR [3.9]; 95%, 1.91–7.96) compared to non-trauma centers. Approximately 40% (n = 117,948) of those with only DFF received non-wrist radiographs and 19% (n = 55,236) underwent non-wrist/non-forearm imaging. Factors independently associated with additional imaging included gender, payer, patient and hospital rurality, hospital region, teaching status, ownership, and trauma center level. Nearly $3.6 million (2018 U.S. dollars) was spent on the aforementioned additional imaging. CONCLUSION: Despite the frequency of proximal imaging in patients with DFF, the incidence of APF was low. Further study to identify risk factors for APF based on mechanism and physical examination factors may result in reduced imaging and decreased avoidable healthcare spending. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6754191 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67541912019-09-25 Concurrent Proximal Fractures Are Rare in Distal Forearm Fractures: A National Cross-sectional Study Negaard, Matthew Vakkalanka, Priyanka Whipple, M. Terese Hogrefe, Christopher Swanson, Morgan B. Harland, Karisa K. Mathiasen, Ross Van Heukelom, Jon Thomsen, Timothy W. Mohr, Nicholas M. West J Emerg Med Trauma INTRODUCTION: Distal forearm fractures (DFF) account for 1.5% of emergency department (ED) visits in the United States. Clinicians frequently obtain imaging above/below the location of injury to rule out additional injuries. We sought to determine the incidence of associated proximal fractures (APF) in the setting of DFF and to evaluate the imaging practices in a nationally representative sample of EDs. METHODS: We queried the 2013 National Emergency Department Sample using International Classification of Diseases, 9th edition, diagnostic codes for DFF and APF. Current Procedural Technology codes identified associated imaging studies. We calculated national estimates using a weighted analysis of patient and hospital-level characteristics associated with APF and imaging practices. An analysis of costs estimated the financial impact of additional imaging in patients with DFF using Medicare reimbursement to approximate costs according to the 2018 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule. RESULTS: In 2013, an estimated 297,755 ED visits (weighted) were associated with a DFF, of which 1.6% (4836 cases) had an APF. The incidence of APF was lower among females (odds ratio [OR] (0.76); 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64–0.91) but higher in metropolitan teaching hospitals compared to metropolitan non-teaching hospitals (OR [2.39]; 95% CI, 1.43–3.99) and Level 1 trauma centers (OR [3.9]; 95%, 1.91–7.96) compared to non-trauma centers. Approximately 40% (n = 117,948) of those with only DFF received non-wrist radiographs and 19% (n = 55,236) underwent non-wrist/non-forearm imaging. Factors independently associated with additional imaging included gender, payer, patient and hospital rurality, hospital region, teaching status, ownership, and trauma center level. Nearly $3.6 million (2018 U.S. dollars) was spent on the aforementioned additional imaging. CONCLUSION: Despite the frequency of proximal imaging in patients with DFF, the incidence of APF was low. Further study to identify risk factors for APF based on mechanism and physical examination factors may result in reduced imaging and decreased avoidable healthcare spending. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine 2019-09 2019-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6754191/ /pubmed/31539332 http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2019.5.42952 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Negaard et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Trauma Negaard, Matthew Vakkalanka, Priyanka Whipple, M. Terese Hogrefe, Christopher Swanson, Morgan B. Harland, Karisa K. Mathiasen, Ross Van Heukelom, Jon Thomsen, Timothy W. Mohr, Nicholas M. Concurrent Proximal Fractures Are Rare in Distal Forearm Fractures: A National Cross-sectional Study |
title | Concurrent Proximal Fractures Are Rare in Distal Forearm Fractures: A National Cross-sectional Study |
title_full | Concurrent Proximal Fractures Are Rare in Distal Forearm Fractures: A National Cross-sectional Study |
title_fullStr | Concurrent Proximal Fractures Are Rare in Distal Forearm Fractures: A National Cross-sectional Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Concurrent Proximal Fractures Are Rare in Distal Forearm Fractures: A National Cross-sectional Study |
title_short | Concurrent Proximal Fractures Are Rare in Distal Forearm Fractures: A National Cross-sectional Study |
title_sort | concurrent proximal fractures are rare in distal forearm fractures: a national cross-sectional study |
topic | Trauma |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6754191/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31539332 http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2019.5.42952 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT negaardmatthew concurrentproximalfracturesarerareindistalforearmfracturesanationalcrosssectionalstudy AT vakkalankapriyanka concurrentproximalfracturesarerareindistalforearmfracturesanationalcrosssectionalstudy AT whipplemterese concurrentproximalfracturesarerareindistalforearmfracturesanationalcrosssectionalstudy AT hogrefechristopher concurrentproximalfracturesarerareindistalforearmfracturesanationalcrosssectionalstudy AT swansonmorganb concurrentproximalfracturesarerareindistalforearmfracturesanationalcrosssectionalstudy AT harlandkarisak concurrentproximalfracturesarerareindistalforearmfracturesanationalcrosssectionalstudy AT mathiasenross concurrentproximalfracturesarerareindistalforearmfracturesanationalcrosssectionalstudy AT vanheukelomjon concurrentproximalfracturesarerareindistalforearmfracturesanationalcrosssectionalstudy AT thomsentimothyw concurrentproximalfracturesarerareindistalforearmfracturesanationalcrosssectionalstudy AT mohrnicholasm concurrentproximalfracturesarerareindistalforearmfracturesanationalcrosssectionalstudy |