Cargando…

Single Versus Double Tourniquet Technique for Ultrasound-Guided Venous Catheter Placement

INTRODUCTION: Peripheral, ultrasound-guided intravenous (IV) access occurs frequently in the emergency department, but certain populations present unique challenges for successfully completing this procedure. Prior research has demonstrated decreased compressibility under double tourniquet technique...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Price, Jacob, Xiao, Jane, Tausch, Katie, Hang, Bophal, Bahl, Amit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6754199/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31539328
http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2019.7.43362
_version_ 1783453039930114048
author Price, Jacob
Xiao, Jane
Tausch, Katie
Hang, Bophal
Bahl, Amit
author_facet Price, Jacob
Xiao, Jane
Tausch, Katie
Hang, Bophal
Bahl, Amit
author_sort Price, Jacob
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Peripheral, ultrasound-guided intravenous (IV) access occurs frequently in the emergency department, but certain populations present unique challenges for successfully completing this procedure. Prior research has demonstrated decreased compressibility under double tourniquet technique (DT) compared with single tourniquet (ST). We hypothesized that catheters inserted under DT method would have a higher first-stick success rate compared with those inserted under ST method. METHODS: We randomized 100 patients with a history of difficult IV access, as defined by past ultrasound IV, prior emergency visit with two or more attempts required for vascular access, history of IV drug abuse, history of end stage renal disease on hemodialysis or obesity, to ultrasound-guided IV placement under either DT or ST method. We measured the vein characteristics measured under ultrasound, and recorded the number of attempts and location of attempts at vascular access. RESULTS: Of an initial 100 patients enrolled, we analyzed a total of 99 with 48 placed under ST and 51 placed under DT. Attending physicians inserted 41.7% of ST and 41.2% of DT, with non-attending inserters (including residents, nurses, and technicians) inserted the remainder. First-stick success rate was observed at 64.3% in ST and 66.7% in DT (p=0.93). Attendings had an overall higher first-stick success rate (95.1%) compared to non-attending inserters (65.5%) (p=<0.001). The average vein depth measured in ST was 0.73 centimeters (cm) compared with 0.87 cm in DT (p=0.02). CONCLUSION: DT technique did not produce a measureable increase in first-stick success rate compared to ST, including after adjusting for level of training of inserter. However, a significant difference in average vein depth between the study arms may have limited the reliability of our overall results. Future studies controlling for this variable may be required to more accurately compare these two techniques.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6754199
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67541992019-09-25 Single Versus Double Tourniquet Technique for Ultrasound-Guided Venous Catheter Placement Price, Jacob Xiao, Jane Tausch, Katie Hang, Bophal Bahl, Amit West J Emerg Med Technology in Emergency Care INTRODUCTION: Peripheral, ultrasound-guided intravenous (IV) access occurs frequently in the emergency department, but certain populations present unique challenges for successfully completing this procedure. Prior research has demonstrated decreased compressibility under double tourniquet technique (DT) compared with single tourniquet (ST). We hypothesized that catheters inserted under DT method would have a higher first-stick success rate compared with those inserted under ST method. METHODS: We randomized 100 patients with a history of difficult IV access, as defined by past ultrasound IV, prior emergency visit with two or more attempts required for vascular access, history of IV drug abuse, history of end stage renal disease on hemodialysis or obesity, to ultrasound-guided IV placement under either DT or ST method. We measured the vein characteristics measured under ultrasound, and recorded the number of attempts and location of attempts at vascular access. RESULTS: Of an initial 100 patients enrolled, we analyzed a total of 99 with 48 placed under ST and 51 placed under DT. Attending physicians inserted 41.7% of ST and 41.2% of DT, with non-attending inserters (including residents, nurses, and technicians) inserted the remainder. First-stick success rate was observed at 64.3% in ST and 66.7% in DT (p=0.93). Attendings had an overall higher first-stick success rate (95.1%) compared to non-attending inserters (65.5%) (p=<0.001). The average vein depth measured in ST was 0.73 centimeters (cm) compared with 0.87 cm in DT (p=0.02). CONCLUSION: DT technique did not produce a measureable increase in first-stick success rate compared to ST, including after adjusting for level of training of inserter. However, a significant difference in average vein depth between the study arms may have limited the reliability of our overall results. Future studies controlling for this variable may be required to more accurately compare these two techniques. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine 2019-09 2019-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6754199/ /pubmed/31539328 http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2019.7.43362 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Price et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Technology in Emergency Care
Price, Jacob
Xiao, Jane
Tausch, Katie
Hang, Bophal
Bahl, Amit
Single Versus Double Tourniquet Technique for Ultrasound-Guided Venous Catheter Placement
title Single Versus Double Tourniquet Technique for Ultrasound-Guided Venous Catheter Placement
title_full Single Versus Double Tourniquet Technique for Ultrasound-Guided Venous Catheter Placement
title_fullStr Single Versus Double Tourniquet Technique for Ultrasound-Guided Venous Catheter Placement
title_full_unstemmed Single Versus Double Tourniquet Technique for Ultrasound-Guided Venous Catheter Placement
title_short Single Versus Double Tourniquet Technique for Ultrasound-Guided Venous Catheter Placement
title_sort single versus double tourniquet technique for ultrasound-guided venous catheter placement
topic Technology in Emergency Care
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6754199/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31539328
http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2019.7.43362
work_keys_str_mv AT pricejacob singleversusdoubletourniquettechniqueforultrasoundguidedvenouscatheterplacement
AT xiaojane singleversusdoubletourniquettechniqueforultrasoundguidedvenouscatheterplacement
AT tauschkatie singleversusdoubletourniquettechniqueforultrasoundguidedvenouscatheterplacement
AT hangbophal singleversusdoubletourniquettechniqueforultrasoundguidedvenouscatheterplacement
AT bahlamit singleversusdoubletourniquettechniqueforultrasoundguidedvenouscatheterplacement