Cargando…

The surgical ward round checklist: improving patient safety and clinical documentation

PURPOSE: The daily surgical ward round (WR) is a complex process. Key aspects of patient assessment can be missed or not be documented in case notes. Safety checklists used outside of medicine help standardize performance and minimize errors. Its implementation has been beneficial in the National He...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Krishnamohan, Nitya, Maitra, Ishaan, Shetty, Vinutha D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6754526/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31571896
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S178896
_version_ 1783453090480914432
author Krishnamohan, Nitya
Maitra, Ishaan
Shetty, Vinutha D
author_facet Krishnamohan, Nitya
Maitra, Ishaan
Shetty, Vinutha D
author_sort Krishnamohan, Nitya
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The daily surgical ward round (WR) is a complex process. Key aspects of patient assessment can be missed or not be documented in case notes. Safety checklists used outside of medicine help standardize performance and minimize errors. Its implementation has been beneficial in the National Health Service. A structured WR checklist standardizes key aspects of care that need to be addressed on a daily surgical WR. To improve patient safety and documentation, we implemented a surgical WR checklist for daily surgical WRs at our hospital. We describe our experience of its implementation within the general surgical department of a teaching hospital in the UK. METHODS: A retrospective review of case note entries from surgical WRs (including Urology and Vascular surgery) was conducted between April 2015 and January 2016. WR entries of 72 case notes were audited for documentation of six parameters from the surgical WR checklist. A WR checklist label with the parameters was designed for use for each WR entry. A post-checklist implementation audit of 61 case notes was performed between Jan 2016 and August 2016. To assess outcome on patient safety, adverse events relating to these six parameters reported to the local clinical governance team were reviewed pre – and post-checklist implementation. RESULTS: Overall documentation of the six parameters improved following implementation of the WR checklist (pre-checklist=26% vs post-checklist=79%). Documentation of assessment of fluid balance improved from 8% to 76%. Subsequent audit at 3 months post-checklist implementation maintained improvement with documentation at 72%. CONCLUSION: The introduction of the surgical WR checklist has improved documentation of key aspects of patient care. The WR checklist benefits patient safety. It improves communication, documentation and ensures that key issues are not missed at patient assessment on WRs. A crucial factor for successful documentation is engagement by the senior clinicians and nursing staff on its benefits which ensures appropriate use of WR checklist labels occurs as doctors rotate through the surgical placement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6754526
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67545262019-09-30 The surgical ward round checklist: improving patient safety and clinical documentation Krishnamohan, Nitya Maitra, Ishaan Shetty, Vinutha D J Multidiscip Healthc Article PURPOSE: The daily surgical ward round (WR) is a complex process. Key aspects of patient assessment can be missed or not be documented in case notes. Safety checklists used outside of medicine help standardize performance and minimize errors. Its implementation has been beneficial in the National Health Service. A structured WR checklist standardizes key aspects of care that need to be addressed on a daily surgical WR. To improve patient safety and documentation, we implemented a surgical WR checklist for daily surgical WRs at our hospital. We describe our experience of its implementation within the general surgical department of a teaching hospital in the UK. METHODS: A retrospective review of case note entries from surgical WRs (including Urology and Vascular surgery) was conducted between April 2015 and January 2016. WR entries of 72 case notes were audited for documentation of six parameters from the surgical WR checklist. A WR checklist label with the parameters was designed for use for each WR entry. A post-checklist implementation audit of 61 case notes was performed between Jan 2016 and August 2016. To assess outcome on patient safety, adverse events relating to these six parameters reported to the local clinical governance team were reviewed pre – and post-checklist implementation. RESULTS: Overall documentation of the six parameters improved following implementation of the WR checklist (pre-checklist=26% vs post-checklist=79%). Documentation of assessment of fluid balance improved from 8% to 76%. Subsequent audit at 3 months post-checklist implementation maintained improvement with documentation at 72%. CONCLUSION: The introduction of the surgical WR checklist has improved documentation of key aspects of patient care. The WR checklist benefits patient safety. It improves communication, documentation and ensures that key issues are not missed at patient assessment on WRs. A crucial factor for successful documentation is engagement by the senior clinicians and nursing staff on its benefits which ensures appropriate use of WR checklist labels occurs as doctors rotate through the surgical placement. Dove 2019-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6754526/ /pubmed/31571896 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S178896 Text en © 2019 Krishnamohan et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Article
Krishnamohan, Nitya
Maitra, Ishaan
Shetty, Vinutha D
The surgical ward round checklist: improving patient safety and clinical documentation
title The surgical ward round checklist: improving patient safety and clinical documentation
title_full The surgical ward round checklist: improving patient safety and clinical documentation
title_fullStr The surgical ward round checklist: improving patient safety and clinical documentation
title_full_unstemmed The surgical ward round checklist: improving patient safety and clinical documentation
title_short The surgical ward round checklist: improving patient safety and clinical documentation
title_sort surgical ward round checklist: improving patient safety and clinical documentation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6754526/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31571896
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S178896
work_keys_str_mv AT krishnamohannitya thesurgicalwardroundchecklistimprovingpatientsafetyandclinicaldocumentation
AT maitraishaan thesurgicalwardroundchecklistimprovingpatientsafetyandclinicaldocumentation
AT shettyvinuthad thesurgicalwardroundchecklistimprovingpatientsafetyandclinicaldocumentation
AT krishnamohannitya surgicalwardroundchecklistimprovingpatientsafetyandclinicaldocumentation
AT maitraishaan surgicalwardroundchecklistimprovingpatientsafetyandclinicaldocumentation
AT shettyvinuthad surgicalwardroundchecklistimprovingpatientsafetyandclinicaldocumentation