Cargando…
The surgical ward round checklist: improving patient safety and clinical documentation
PURPOSE: The daily surgical ward round (WR) is a complex process. Key aspects of patient assessment can be missed or not be documented in case notes. Safety checklists used outside of medicine help standardize performance and minimize errors. Its implementation has been beneficial in the National He...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6754526/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31571896 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S178896 |
_version_ | 1783453090480914432 |
---|---|
author | Krishnamohan, Nitya Maitra, Ishaan Shetty, Vinutha D |
author_facet | Krishnamohan, Nitya Maitra, Ishaan Shetty, Vinutha D |
author_sort | Krishnamohan, Nitya |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The daily surgical ward round (WR) is a complex process. Key aspects of patient assessment can be missed or not be documented in case notes. Safety checklists used outside of medicine help standardize performance and minimize errors. Its implementation has been beneficial in the National Health Service. A structured WR checklist standardizes key aspects of care that need to be addressed on a daily surgical WR. To improve patient safety and documentation, we implemented a surgical WR checklist for daily surgical WRs at our hospital. We describe our experience of its implementation within the general surgical department of a teaching hospital in the UK. METHODS: A retrospective review of case note entries from surgical WRs (including Urology and Vascular surgery) was conducted between April 2015 and January 2016. WR entries of 72 case notes were audited for documentation of six parameters from the surgical WR checklist. A WR checklist label with the parameters was designed for use for each WR entry. A post-checklist implementation audit of 61 case notes was performed between Jan 2016 and August 2016. To assess outcome on patient safety, adverse events relating to these six parameters reported to the local clinical governance team were reviewed pre – and post-checklist implementation. RESULTS: Overall documentation of the six parameters improved following implementation of the WR checklist (pre-checklist=26% vs post-checklist=79%). Documentation of assessment of fluid balance improved from 8% to 76%. Subsequent audit at 3 months post-checklist implementation maintained improvement with documentation at 72%. CONCLUSION: The introduction of the surgical WR checklist has improved documentation of key aspects of patient care. The WR checklist benefits patient safety. It improves communication, documentation and ensures that key issues are not missed at patient assessment on WRs. A crucial factor for successful documentation is engagement by the senior clinicians and nursing staff on its benefits which ensures appropriate use of WR checklist labels occurs as doctors rotate through the surgical placement. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6754526 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67545262019-09-30 The surgical ward round checklist: improving patient safety and clinical documentation Krishnamohan, Nitya Maitra, Ishaan Shetty, Vinutha D J Multidiscip Healthc Article PURPOSE: The daily surgical ward round (WR) is a complex process. Key aspects of patient assessment can be missed or not be documented in case notes. Safety checklists used outside of medicine help standardize performance and minimize errors. Its implementation has been beneficial in the National Health Service. A structured WR checklist standardizes key aspects of care that need to be addressed on a daily surgical WR. To improve patient safety and documentation, we implemented a surgical WR checklist for daily surgical WRs at our hospital. We describe our experience of its implementation within the general surgical department of a teaching hospital in the UK. METHODS: A retrospective review of case note entries from surgical WRs (including Urology and Vascular surgery) was conducted between April 2015 and January 2016. WR entries of 72 case notes were audited for documentation of six parameters from the surgical WR checklist. A WR checklist label with the parameters was designed for use for each WR entry. A post-checklist implementation audit of 61 case notes was performed between Jan 2016 and August 2016. To assess outcome on patient safety, adverse events relating to these six parameters reported to the local clinical governance team were reviewed pre – and post-checklist implementation. RESULTS: Overall documentation of the six parameters improved following implementation of the WR checklist (pre-checklist=26% vs post-checklist=79%). Documentation of assessment of fluid balance improved from 8% to 76%. Subsequent audit at 3 months post-checklist implementation maintained improvement with documentation at 72%. CONCLUSION: The introduction of the surgical WR checklist has improved documentation of key aspects of patient care. The WR checklist benefits patient safety. It improves communication, documentation and ensures that key issues are not missed at patient assessment on WRs. A crucial factor for successful documentation is engagement by the senior clinicians and nursing staff on its benefits which ensures appropriate use of WR checklist labels occurs as doctors rotate through the surgical placement. Dove 2019-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6754526/ /pubmed/31571896 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S178896 Text en © 2019 Krishnamohan et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Article Krishnamohan, Nitya Maitra, Ishaan Shetty, Vinutha D The surgical ward round checklist: improving patient safety and clinical documentation |
title | The surgical ward round checklist: improving patient safety and clinical documentation |
title_full | The surgical ward round checklist: improving patient safety and clinical documentation |
title_fullStr | The surgical ward round checklist: improving patient safety and clinical documentation |
title_full_unstemmed | The surgical ward round checklist: improving patient safety and clinical documentation |
title_short | The surgical ward round checklist: improving patient safety and clinical documentation |
title_sort | surgical ward round checklist: improving patient safety and clinical documentation |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6754526/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31571896 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S178896 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT krishnamohannitya thesurgicalwardroundchecklistimprovingpatientsafetyandclinicaldocumentation AT maitraishaan thesurgicalwardroundchecklistimprovingpatientsafetyandclinicaldocumentation AT shettyvinuthad thesurgicalwardroundchecklistimprovingpatientsafetyandclinicaldocumentation AT krishnamohannitya surgicalwardroundchecklistimprovingpatientsafetyandclinicaldocumentation AT maitraishaan surgicalwardroundchecklistimprovingpatientsafetyandclinicaldocumentation AT shettyvinuthad surgicalwardroundchecklistimprovingpatientsafetyandclinicaldocumentation |