Cargando…

Cross-national evidence of a negativity bias in psychophysiological reactions to news

What accounts for the prevalence of negative news content? One answer may lie in the tendency for humans to react more strongly to negative than positive information. “Negativity biases” in human cognition and behavior are well documented, but existing research is based on small Anglo-American sampl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Soroka, Stuart, Fournier, Patrick, Nir, Lilach
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: National Academy of Sciences 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6754543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31481621
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1908369116
_version_ 1783453093827969024
author Soroka, Stuart
Fournier, Patrick
Nir, Lilach
author_facet Soroka, Stuart
Fournier, Patrick
Nir, Lilach
author_sort Soroka, Stuart
collection PubMed
description What accounts for the prevalence of negative news content? One answer may lie in the tendency for humans to react more strongly to negative than positive information. “Negativity biases” in human cognition and behavior are well documented, but existing research is based on small Anglo-American samples and stimuli that are only tangentially related to our political world. This work accordingly reports results from a 17-country, 6-continent experimental study examining psychophysiological reactions to real video news content. Results offer the most comprehensive cross-national demonstration of negativity biases to date, but they also serve to highlight considerable individual-level variation in responsiveness to news content. Insofar as our results make clear the pervasiveness of negativity biases on average, they help account for the tendency for audience-seeking news around the world to be predominantly negative. Insofar as our results highlight individual-level variation, however, they highlight the potential for more positive content, and suggest that there may be reason to reconsider the conventional journalistic wisdom that “if it bleeds, it leads.”
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6754543
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher National Academy of Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67545432019-10-01 Cross-national evidence of a negativity bias in psychophysiological reactions to news Soroka, Stuart Fournier, Patrick Nir, Lilach Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Social Sciences What accounts for the prevalence of negative news content? One answer may lie in the tendency for humans to react more strongly to negative than positive information. “Negativity biases” in human cognition and behavior are well documented, but existing research is based on small Anglo-American samples and stimuli that are only tangentially related to our political world. This work accordingly reports results from a 17-country, 6-continent experimental study examining psychophysiological reactions to real video news content. Results offer the most comprehensive cross-national demonstration of negativity biases to date, but they also serve to highlight considerable individual-level variation in responsiveness to news content. Insofar as our results make clear the pervasiveness of negativity biases on average, they help account for the tendency for audience-seeking news around the world to be predominantly negative. Insofar as our results highlight individual-level variation, however, they highlight the potential for more positive content, and suggest that there may be reason to reconsider the conventional journalistic wisdom that “if it bleeds, it leads.” National Academy of Sciences 2019-09-17 2019-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6754543/ /pubmed/31481621 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1908369116 Text en Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by PNAS. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Social Sciences
Soroka, Stuart
Fournier, Patrick
Nir, Lilach
Cross-national evidence of a negativity bias in psychophysiological reactions to news
title Cross-national evidence of a negativity bias in psychophysiological reactions to news
title_full Cross-national evidence of a negativity bias in psychophysiological reactions to news
title_fullStr Cross-national evidence of a negativity bias in psychophysiological reactions to news
title_full_unstemmed Cross-national evidence of a negativity bias in psychophysiological reactions to news
title_short Cross-national evidence of a negativity bias in psychophysiological reactions to news
title_sort cross-national evidence of a negativity bias in psychophysiological reactions to news
topic Social Sciences
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6754543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31481621
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1908369116
work_keys_str_mv AT sorokastuart crossnationalevidenceofanegativitybiasinpsychophysiologicalreactionstonews
AT fournierpatrick crossnationalevidenceofanegativitybiasinpsychophysiologicalreactionstonews
AT nirlilach crossnationalevidenceofanegativitybiasinpsychophysiologicalreactionstonews