Cargando…
Cross-national evidence of a negativity bias in psychophysiological reactions to news
What accounts for the prevalence of negative news content? One answer may lie in the tendency for humans to react more strongly to negative than positive information. “Negativity biases” in human cognition and behavior are well documented, but existing research is based on small Anglo-American sampl...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
National Academy of Sciences
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6754543/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31481621 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1908369116 |
_version_ | 1783453093827969024 |
---|---|
author | Soroka, Stuart Fournier, Patrick Nir, Lilach |
author_facet | Soroka, Stuart Fournier, Patrick Nir, Lilach |
author_sort | Soroka, Stuart |
collection | PubMed |
description | What accounts for the prevalence of negative news content? One answer may lie in the tendency for humans to react more strongly to negative than positive information. “Negativity biases” in human cognition and behavior are well documented, but existing research is based on small Anglo-American samples and stimuli that are only tangentially related to our political world. This work accordingly reports results from a 17-country, 6-continent experimental study examining psychophysiological reactions to real video news content. Results offer the most comprehensive cross-national demonstration of negativity biases to date, but they also serve to highlight considerable individual-level variation in responsiveness to news content. Insofar as our results make clear the pervasiveness of negativity biases on average, they help account for the tendency for audience-seeking news around the world to be predominantly negative. Insofar as our results highlight individual-level variation, however, they highlight the potential for more positive content, and suggest that there may be reason to reconsider the conventional journalistic wisdom that “if it bleeds, it leads.” |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6754543 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | National Academy of Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67545432019-10-01 Cross-national evidence of a negativity bias in psychophysiological reactions to news Soroka, Stuart Fournier, Patrick Nir, Lilach Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Social Sciences What accounts for the prevalence of negative news content? One answer may lie in the tendency for humans to react more strongly to negative than positive information. “Negativity biases” in human cognition and behavior are well documented, but existing research is based on small Anglo-American samples and stimuli that are only tangentially related to our political world. This work accordingly reports results from a 17-country, 6-continent experimental study examining psychophysiological reactions to real video news content. Results offer the most comprehensive cross-national demonstration of negativity biases to date, but they also serve to highlight considerable individual-level variation in responsiveness to news content. Insofar as our results make clear the pervasiveness of negativity biases on average, they help account for the tendency for audience-seeking news around the world to be predominantly negative. Insofar as our results highlight individual-level variation, however, they highlight the potential for more positive content, and suggest that there may be reason to reconsider the conventional journalistic wisdom that “if it bleeds, it leads.” National Academy of Sciences 2019-09-17 2019-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6754543/ /pubmed/31481621 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1908369116 Text en Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by PNAS. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Social Sciences Soroka, Stuart Fournier, Patrick Nir, Lilach Cross-national evidence of a negativity bias in psychophysiological reactions to news |
title | Cross-national evidence of a negativity bias in psychophysiological reactions to news |
title_full | Cross-national evidence of a negativity bias in psychophysiological reactions to news |
title_fullStr | Cross-national evidence of a negativity bias in psychophysiological reactions to news |
title_full_unstemmed | Cross-national evidence of a negativity bias in psychophysiological reactions to news |
title_short | Cross-national evidence of a negativity bias in psychophysiological reactions to news |
title_sort | cross-national evidence of a negativity bias in psychophysiological reactions to news |
topic | Social Sciences |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6754543/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31481621 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1908369116 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sorokastuart crossnationalevidenceofanegativitybiasinpsychophysiologicalreactionstonews AT fournierpatrick crossnationalevidenceofanegativitybiasinpsychophysiologicalreactionstonews AT nirlilach crossnationalevidenceofanegativitybiasinpsychophysiologicalreactionstonews |