Cargando…
Big data approaches to decomposing heterogeneity across the autism spectrum
Autism is a diagnostic label based on behavior. While the diagnostic criteria attempt to maximize clinical consensus, it also masks a wide degree of heterogeneity between and within individuals at multiple levels of analysis. Understanding this multi-level heterogeneity is of high clinical and trans...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6754748/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30617272 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41380-018-0321-0 |
_version_ | 1783453115968651264 |
---|---|
author | Lombardo, Michael V. Lai, Meng-Chuan Baron-Cohen, Simon |
author_facet | Lombardo, Michael V. Lai, Meng-Chuan Baron-Cohen, Simon |
author_sort | Lombardo, Michael V. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Autism is a diagnostic label based on behavior. While the diagnostic criteria attempt to maximize clinical consensus, it also masks a wide degree of heterogeneity between and within individuals at multiple levels of analysis. Understanding this multi-level heterogeneity is of high clinical and translational importance. Here we present organizing principles to frame research examining multi-level heterogeneity in autism. Theoretical concepts such as ‘spectrum’ or ‘autisms’ reflect non-mutually exclusive explanations regarding continuous/dimensional or categorical/qualitative variation between and within individuals. However, common practices of small sample size studies and case–control models are suboptimal for tackling heterogeneity. Big data are an important ingredient for furthering our understanding of heterogeneity in autism. In addition to being ‘feature-rich’, big data should be both ‘broad’ (i.e., large sample size) and ‘deep’ (i.e., multiple levels of data collected on the same individuals). These characteristics increase the likelihood that the study results are more generalizable and facilitate evaluation of the utility of different models of heterogeneity. A model’s utility can be measured by its ability to explain clinically or mechanistically important phenomena, and also by explaining how variability manifests across different levels of analysis. The directionality for explaining variability across levels can be bottom-up or top-down, and should include the importance of development for characterizing changes within individuals. While progress can be made with ‘supervised’ models built upon a priori or theoretically predicted distinctions or dimensions of importance, it will become increasingly important to complement such work with unsupervised data-driven discoveries that leverage unknown and multivariate distinctions within big data. A better understanding of how to model heterogeneity between autistic people will facilitate progress towards precision medicine for symptoms that cause suffering, and person-centered support. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6754748 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67547482019-09-21 Big data approaches to decomposing heterogeneity across the autism spectrum Lombardo, Michael V. Lai, Meng-Chuan Baron-Cohen, Simon Mol Psychiatry Expert Review Autism is a diagnostic label based on behavior. While the diagnostic criteria attempt to maximize clinical consensus, it also masks a wide degree of heterogeneity between and within individuals at multiple levels of analysis. Understanding this multi-level heterogeneity is of high clinical and translational importance. Here we present organizing principles to frame research examining multi-level heterogeneity in autism. Theoretical concepts such as ‘spectrum’ or ‘autisms’ reflect non-mutually exclusive explanations regarding continuous/dimensional or categorical/qualitative variation between and within individuals. However, common practices of small sample size studies and case–control models are suboptimal for tackling heterogeneity. Big data are an important ingredient for furthering our understanding of heterogeneity in autism. In addition to being ‘feature-rich’, big data should be both ‘broad’ (i.e., large sample size) and ‘deep’ (i.e., multiple levels of data collected on the same individuals). These characteristics increase the likelihood that the study results are more generalizable and facilitate evaluation of the utility of different models of heterogeneity. A model’s utility can be measured by its ability to explain clinically or mechanistically important phenomena, and also by explaining how variability manifests across different levels of analysis. The directionality for explaining variability across levels can be bottom-up or top-down, and should include the importance of development for characterizing changes within individuals. While progress can be made with ‘supervised’ models built upon a priori or theoretically predicted distinctions or dimensions of importance, it will become increasingly important to complement such work with unsupervised data-driven discoveries that leverage unknown and multivariate distinctions within big data. A better understanding of how to model heterogeneity between autistic people will facilitate progress towards precision medicine for symptoms that cause suffering, and person-centered support. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-01-07 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6754748/ /pubmed/30617272 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41380-018-0321-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Expert Review Lombardo, Michael V. Lai, Meng-Chuan Baron-Cohen, Simon Big data approaches to decomposing heterogeneity across the autism spectrum |
title | Big data approaches to decomposing heterogeneity across the autism spectrum |
title_full | Big data approaches to decomposing heterogeneity across the autism spectrum |
title_fullStr | Big data approaches to decomposing heterogeneity across the autism spectrum |
title_full_unstemmed | Big data approaches to decomposing heterogeneity across the autism spectrum |
title_short | Big data approaches to decomposing heterogeneity across the autism spectrum |
title_sort | big data approaches to decomposing heterogeneity across the autism spectrum |
topic | Expert Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6754748/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30617272 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41380-018-0321-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lombardomichaelv bigdataapproachestodecomposingheterogeneityacrosstheautismspectrum AT laimengchuan bigdataapproachestodecomposingheterogeneityacrosstheautismspectrum AT baroncohensimon bigdataapproachestodecomposingheterogeneityacrosstheautismspectrum |